I contest the idea that Latin text can never look good on a flag. Rather I think that these West Asian flags look like flags worth dying under... precisely because they literally are flags that people are currently dying under. Which is to say that these flags come from a culture of active and organized armed resistance against colonialism and imperialism, whereas logos like PVDA/PTB's or Norway's Red Party's are instead designed inside a broader culture of entrenched liberal democracy. The logos of major leftist parties within the imperial core are meant to compete with the logos of (other) parliamentary parties on election posters, which means that how good they look in videos of people with guns is just a complete non-factor as long as there are no people with guns in the picture.
chapotraphouse
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
isn't there also a huge tradition of Arabic calligraphy? I feel like that might contribute
What is the primary aspect do you think? The difference in the types of struggle and their urgency, or the script used? P. sure it's the former.
The logos of major leftist parties within the imperial core are meant to compete with the logos of (other) parliamentary parties
Didn't think about it that way, makes a lot more sense now
it probably helps that they are not made with boss' profit in mind.
The EPR flag/symbol kinda goes hard, even with the latin text
It's not the most aesthetic design but it's pretty good. I do tend to favor the arabic script flags though, quality calligraphy can make a flag
Calligraphy prepreps you for this imo