this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
816 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

71585 readers
3555 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 16 minutes ago

If it had vtech and a fart cannon it would have hit 600m.

[–] RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.cafe 15 points 1 hour ago

Anything that erodes SpaceX's monopoly is good for me

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

This wasn't much more than a toy rocket:

6.3 m in length, 85 cm in diameter,
The test was completed successfully, the first time Honda landed a rocket after reaching an altitude of nearly 300 meters.

But still they were successful on their first try, so we will have to see where they take it from here. 🚀

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Genuinely curious: how many explosions before the successful test?

[–] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 2 points 24 minutes ago

Apparently they got it right on the first try.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 72 points 7 hours ago

Honda built a rocket

Me: of course they did.

They launched the rocket

Me: naturally.

They landed the rocket.

Me: on the first try?

[–] robogeek@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Idk, looks more like Hitachi

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 4 points 2 hours ago

Hitachi - Get perpendicular

Not just for hard drives anymore.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 hours ago

I wanna buy one and see what it can do with an old 4 cylinder VTEC out of a Civic Si.

[–] BoycottPro@lemm.ee 57 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I hope they crush SpaceX one day.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

By landing on them.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 9 hours ago

Of all the manufacturing companies, I would expect nothing less from Honda.

[–] Lawnman23@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What the F is every corporation's boner with rockets? 🚀

[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 14 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

Because the last stage of existence on this planet. Will be febel plans to try and colonize other planets. Because our planet will start to poison us as a defensive mechanism. All of these Corporations need a plan to get off planet.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

The planet isn't doing anything, we are poisoning ourselves. Or as lemmy puts it "big evil corporations (which we support everyday because it's cheaper than buying local/sustainable) are poisoning us".

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 2 points 1 hour ago

Imo it's a good thing tho. Spreading our civilization across multiple planets is the only way to guarantee long long term success. Obviously we should also fix the climate change issue (and many others). But still, being spread across the solar system would give our species redundancy. An extinction event on earth like a large meteor strike would no longer be the end.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It would take a lot to make Mars more habitable than Earth. This isn't about colonisation this is simply that it's cool to build rockets.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's easier to terraform ... Planet Earth!

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

It's the only planet we can terraform (As in repairing some of the damage we've done), we are nowhere near able to terraform Mars, not even theoretically and disregarding cost.
Maybe in a century we can. But only maybe.

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, let spend money to fuck up other planets as well instead of saving this one. /s

[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That’s exactly what they will say.

[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Feeble? But I think you meant futile? Idk.

[–] altphoto 22 points 9 hours ago

The all new Honda space Odyssey! It has a great V6 rocket engine with a 6000 million mile timing belt. After that you can buy one at amazon but it lasts 4 miles or 6 minutes.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago
[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 161 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (12 children)

It seems crazy that a company that's only really known for cars, motorbikes, tuning forks, heat pumps, brake pads, pens, tractors, fertilizer, display panels, outboard motors, pneumatic systems, oil tankers, furniture, locomotives, bricks, solar panels, ATVs, generators, hot air balloons, dinghies, hydrogen fuel cells, submarines, crop dusters, jet engines, cultivators, hedge trimmers, lawnmowers, precision optics and robots would suddenly pivot to rockets.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

To be fair to Honda, they are doing what is expected of any companies in a capitalist system, actually innovate and diversify in order to remain competitive. Most other companies would rather stick to their traditional products and services, even if those products and services are written on the wall that they are becoming obsolete.

[–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

The impressive part is that they are also known for being reliable, there are the occasional issues, but overall very trustworthy products.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 51 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Don't forget, one the sleekest airplanes to ever exist.

[–] drsilverworm@midwest.social 3 points 2 hours ago

N420HA. Not sure if that's the model or the plane's license plate but either way hell yeah

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 63 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's almost like they're an engineering company.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 hours ago

Crazy, right?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 23 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

An alternative to starlink would be great.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

An alternative to anything related to Elon would be great.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 25 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

An alternative to.space junk clogging up the sky would indeed be nice.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago

It sounds like he's asking for more space junk.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 177 points 15 hours ago (30 children)

This is the first I have heard they were doing this. Makes spacex accomplishments less impressive. Fuck elon

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 21 minutes ago

How does it make spaceX’s accomplishments less impressive? SpaceX pioneered it. Space X did it first, with a significantly bigger rocket and at a significantly higher altitude. Honda no doubt achieved this by looking at what spacex did and how they did it and copying it.

This actually makes spaceX’s accomplishments look even more impressive.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

Um, no it doesn't... At all...

This is a first step landing test, not even suborbital, it flew to a height of 300 meters. This is the point that SpaceX was at in 2011 with their grasshopper rocket.

SpaceX is regularly landing orbital hardware and working on a fully reusable rocket with a greater lifting capacity than anything else ever. It's not really the same...

But fuck Elon, no argument there.

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›