this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
114 points (91.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27258 readers
1666 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have come across a lot's of people like these. like 99% of them. Sometimes it makes me think twice if what i am saying is wrong? What's wrong with them. Is it so hard to swallow your pride and acknowledge that the other person is speaking facts? When they come to know they are wrong they proceed to insult/make fun of others to save their ass. Just why?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Koen967@feddit.nl 57 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I wouldn't know, because I've never been wrong.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago

Me neither. OP is obviously an idiot.

[–] tygerprints@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Me neither. I once thought I was wrong but it turns out I was mistaken.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Best thing my daddy taught me; no matter how confident you are, you could always be wrong. Brains are just unreliable sometimes. Sky is blue? Could be wrong. You’re N years old? Probably… but you could be wrong.

Accepting this allows one to improve. Best we can do is recognize this, and try our best to minimize how often we’re wrong.

This has allowed me to withhold confidence in many situations. Not in deference, but in thoughtful acceptance that I truly might be wrong.

Best dad ever.

[–] Metacortechs@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

That really warms my heart to hear. I'm trying to be one of the good dads.

Just today my 9 year old and I had a conversation about how I'm always the first to step up and admit when I make a mistake, and communicate what I did or will do to fix it, where I have colleagues who will try to hide their mistakes and front like they never ever make them. Going so far as lying to clients, bosses, and coworkers all the way.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The problem with this is the quiet nihilism baked into it, which is the same reason so many people believe that widely supported science could be wrong.
In the absolute sense, it is true. Though things like "the sky is blue" is more about linguistics, but for a layperson it's kind of inconsequential either way. While there is a small possibility that scientific consensus could be wrong, there is orders of magnitude bigger chance that unwarranted skepticism is dangerous. Reality does exist, regardless of how much epistemology you choose to wave away.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When I feel like I am getting dragged into an argument on the internet I try to remember that when two people argue at least 50% of them are wrong.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Not necessarily. Both people can be correct, but arguing just to "win". Both people can also be wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 520@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because people tie their egos to their opinions and beliefs. They see an attack on those as an attack on their person.

We are all like this to certain extents. For example, I am a firm believer of the right of the individual to make their own choices, and believe that attempts to remove a person's right to make choices morally abhorrent.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's a basic psychological need to be able to trust that your brain can be right. A lot of psychological problems can result if you don't trust your own brain to be able to solve problems and cope with new information.

Some people don't learn the value of accepting mistakes/failure as part of learning. As a result, they will associate being wrong with weakening the trust they have in their brain. They don't want to believe that their brain may not come up with answers for the problems and changes they face in life. So they will deny that their brain is incorrect.

It's an ugly insecurity, but it's totally understandable from an evolutionary perspective. We need to be able to trust our brains to navigate life's challenges. People need to be taught that it's okay to make mistakes, and that admitting when you are wrong is an opportunity for personal growth.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mydude@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

When trying to persuade someone of something, you need to talk to the elephant, not the rider (emotion, not logic). That's why propaganda works so well and facts don't.

[–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

The answer is 1: they're stubborn, but more importantly 2: it's because the human brainly is wired to hate conflicting ideas. Quite literally, when a belief or idea of yours in countered, your brain tells you "your feeling pain and in danger", and this applies to every person, though some people feel it more strongly than others.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Cognitive dissonance. Lots of people never learn and are never taught how to separate their ego from their knowledge. It doesn't help that education still relies on punishing mistakes and failure.

[–] jacobc436@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes. Most people are this way.

[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, and when most people are a certain way, odds are you are too. I try to keep an open mind as much as possible because it's very hard to identify your own biases and it would be naive to believe that I am the exception to human nature.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i actually find it reasonably easy to identify my biases, it's just basically impossible to directly act on that knowledge.

if i realize i'm actually probably in the wrong i tend to just sorta.. slide into the shadows and disengage, which is at least better than continuing to insist that i'm correct and just digging in deeper.. Then in the future the brain tends to have let go of it and people have forgot what was said previously and i can upgrade to a more correct take.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Because I'm not wrong, you are.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because most people, when they’re showing someone else that they’re wrong, choose to twist the knife about it. Onlookers add in jeers and snark, making the experience of admitting one was wrong into an unnecessarily-painful shaming event.

People don’t want to admit they’re wrong, because our culture punishes people who admit they were wrong.

In the cases when a person speaks to me as if I am someone capable of admitting I’m wrong, when they treat it like it’s no big deal I just happen to be wrong, I have no trouble admitting it.

For me what works is to show me without much emotion. Like pointing out to someone they’ve got a leaf in their hair or something. If someone comes at me, with proof that I’m wrong, in the manner of a helpful friend pointing out something I can’t see from my vantage point, it really doesn’t hurt.

But when people are calling me evil, stupid, toxic, etc, I just want to dig in my heels. I might see that I’m wrong, and at that point stop arguing my point, but I won’t actually come out and acknowledge it.

[–] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago

I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I would accept being wrong, if I ever was.

I'm not tho. 😤

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cacheson@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read somewhere a while back that it's supposedly an evolutionary thing. In a social competition for resource allocation, confidently arguing your position regardless of its correctness is more beneficial than admitting you may be wrong.

It's probably exacerbated by the internet, where the relative anonymity and psychological disconnection further reduces any benefits to admitting to an error.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Evolutionary biologist here.

This is actually a tricky one. Lying (and I’m going to fold the projection of false confidence in with that one because I’m talking about deception, intentional or otherwise, not a moral concept) is only effective if others believe you.

Humans, as the most highly social of the primates and ranking among the most highly social animals on earth, have adapted to believe each other, because this helps with trust, coordination, shared identity, learning, and so on. However, it also creates a vulnerability to manipulation by dishonest actors. Again, I’m not talking about a moral dimension here. There are species in which mating is initiated with the gift of a nuptial present (eg a dead bug) from the male to the female. Sometimes the male will give a fake present (already desiccated insect, eg) to trick the female, and sometimes it works. Deception and detection are an arms race, and it’s believed by many to be one of the drivers that lead to the development of human intelligence, where our information processing capacity developed alongside our increasing social complexity.

The problem is that when lying becomes the default, then the beneficial effects of communication cease. It’s like when you stop playing games with a kid that just cheats every time, or stop buying from a store that just rips people off. It’s a strategy that only works if few enough people play it. There’s tons of caveats and additional variables, but that’s the baseline. So why do we still see so much of it?

The first component of course is confirmation bias. If 90% of our interactions are trustworthy, the ones that stick out will be the deceptions, and the biggest deceptions will get the most notice. The second is that the deceptions as a whole have not been impactful enough, over time, to overcome the advantages of trust, either in biological time or in social evolutionary time. You will notice that more trust is given to in-group rather than out-group members, and a number of researchers think that has to do with larger social adaptations, such as collective punishment of deceivers - sending someone to jail for writing bad checks, say, is easier if they’re part of your community as opposed to a tourist from another country. We can also see cultural differences in levels of trust accorded in-group and out-group persons, but that’s getting into a lot of detail.

The third major operator is the concept of the self. This is a subject where we are just being able to start making scientific headway - understanding where the concept of a self comes from in terms of neurobiology and evolutionary dynamics - but this is still very much a new science layered on top of ancient philosophy. In the concept of the self there is a component of what I’m going to calll the physical integrity of the structure. People find being wrong painful - there are social situations that activate the same parts of the physical brain as physical pain and distress do. This is especially true of those ideas are seen as being held by other group members, because you now have the group structural integrity on top of the one in idea-space. That’s where you get people willing to literally die on the hill of Trump winning in 2020. For the evolutionary construction and nature of the self I’d recommend Sapolsky and Metzinger - it’s too new and too complex to get into here. If you want to just summarize it in your mind, call this component ego defense.

I think that’s most of what’s going on, at least as we understand it so far.

[–] cacheson@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Interesting. I was thinking more of gray area stuff than outright lying, like playing up the importance of facts that support one's position and downplaying those that don't.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the educated view on the topic.

[–] sara 6 points 1 year ago

Cognitive dissonance. People see themselves as rational and intelligent and anything that counters that is very difficult to accept, so they double down.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

What makes you think it's most people? Who you hangin out with?

Remember, Confucious say: If you are the smartest person in the room, then you are in the wrong room.

[–] serial_crusher@lemmy.basedcount.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sometimes you have to cut your losses and leave a conversation. If it’s some rando on the internet, just walk away and try not to care what they think.

With people you know and respect, you’re gonna have to hunker down for the long haul. Remember, if you come off like a jerk, they’re going to be less likely to accept your argument. Be respectful of their position but ask probing questions. Let them see for themselves that they’re wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What makes you think you're the one who's in the right? You're another.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Because they're never taught or encounter the notion that its fun to be wrong and learn more to correct and be able to speak more confidently in future.

I love when people correct me and we have a little discourse and the truth-seeking function of this format is satisfied in the end with everybody playfully (or sometimes testily but still vaguely good-faith) cross-examining each other and leaving space for learning and retaining space to allow people to revise when they are genuine in their attempts to understand.

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ego has been mentioned. Sunk cost fallacy plays a part. Combine those and people tend to over value the effort they've made to form their opinion, either through some form of information consumption or synthesis of known ideas/held opinions, while devaluing/doubting the existence other people's previous efforts. So, you often end up with two people who both think they're informed and assume the other person is just making up an opinion right now and failing to see their valuable insight.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On the other side of the coin - why do so many people give others shit for being wrong, especially in areas where right or wrong has no real consequences?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tygerprints@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I encounter that all the time especially on public forums like this. This is a quote from an article I found about it online: According to psychologist, speaker and author Guy Winch, most people who consistently refuse to admit they're wrong do so because they have incredibly fragile egos. They clam up and insist they're right, demonstrating what experts term "psychological rigidity", as a defense mechanism.

Also I think that telling someone they are wrong comes across as a criticism about their intellect and they respond defensively by instinct. And, another reason is because people don't want to believe anything that contradicts their preferred view of the world. So if you "correct" someone they tend to act like you're attacking them or as too stupid to know what "truth" is.

It's really a telling distinction because today, most people behave in this defensive way. You don't see many people willing to concede or say, "wow that's a different point of view than I have considered, maybe it requires me to spend some thought on why I feel the way I do." Which is the real value of differing opinions; they help us re-assess and redefine the reasons why we feel the way we do.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, young grasshopper. You are now discovering the ways of the world. It is not enough simply to be right; one must be cool about it, too. Which unfortunately means not getting pissed off that the other person is talking bullshit, because that only makes whoever you're talking to double down, no matter how pants-on-head their point is.

As to what is wrong with them and why: pride, and embarrassment.

It's a cliche and also very hard advice to follow, but it's true that the best thing to do is smile and walk away. Know that they know you know they're wrong and an idiot, and take comfort in it.

Edit: It's very hard. I struggle with it every day, including yesterday, and today. Just gotta keep trying, we'll get it eventually, right?

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Online it can become a competitive thing. They still want to "win" the argument even if the light comes on and they realize they have incorrect or incomplete information and the other side has made better arguments with better evidence. I suspect most people fall into this trap at some point in online forums. I definitely have. Guilty as charged.

And not to excuse this behavior, but part of it comes from poor sportsmanship and lack of grace from damned near everyone vis a vis Twitter/X/Facebook/reddit. People who "win" a competition like this are quick to gloat on how they "owned" the other person. Worse than this, trying to be reasonable and open-minded in these spaces often comes across as weakness.

There is a small movement of folks who call for radical empathy. This is where you do your level best to make a good faith effort to fully understand and see the merits of the other side's arguments even if you don't agree. That way lies learning and growth.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] drailin@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I have struggled against this for a long time. I tend to be a pretty prideful person and the urge to shift blame when I fuck up and deflect when faced with being wrong is something that has I have to actively work to correct. The difference for me came when I was younger in dealing with my parents: My dad was far from perfect and there were plenty of times he was in the wrong, but always made sure to sit down with me and apologize if he fucked up. My mom, for the most part, was better at avoiding being in the wrong in the first place, but when she was, I never once got her to apologize or admit her mistake. Of the two, I was hurt far more by the latter, and make it a point to be willing to admit my shortcomings.

The most difficult part after I identified it as an issue is to not let my willingness to apologize/admit my mistake become a carte blanche for continuing the behavior. If I fuck up, apologizing only means something if I work on the mistake. If I am wrong about somethimg, I should learn about both the thing and where my misconceptions came from.

For a lot of people, realizing it is an issue is difficult, because you first have to let go of the pride by acknowledging it. Shame isn't a good motivator, as it makes most people double down on pride.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It depends. Some people will relentlessly mock you for being wrong, no matter how you handle it. At work I have no problem admitting I messed up something, there's no point and always it's better to just fix it, right?

But with my ex, he was just dead judgemental. Might as well double down if I wasn't sure since my accuracy rate was higher than his.

With husband I can just say I don't know and it's fine. On the occasion I send him something not factual I do send correction there is no penalty, for lack of a better word.

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Insecurity. People are afraid of being perceived as weak and don’t have the emotional maturity to work through it. They can’t see that it’s a sign of confidence and strength to be able to do so.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's frustrating, because the people who normally call this out are the people who are most likely to be the ones doing it.

They see people around them fail to think critically, they criticize them for that, and then turn around and never question their own opinions. Because "obviously I am right".

Not accusing you of it, but I'm sure a lot of people reading this fall into that category. Maybe we all do.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jacktherippah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

We're not wrong OP, you're wrong!!! Right, guys?

[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

There's also the possibility of competing interests. There's no "wrong" answer, but people will argue certain facts to persuade others to take their position. This is called "politics."

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Because I'm not! I'm not I'm not I'm not!

More seriously, we tend to make it a Great Big Thing when people are wrong. If we acknowledge it and move on, and let them do the same, I'm sure admitting when we're wrong would be much less painful.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Truth is a difficult place to get there and the farther you stray from it the harder it is to get to. This is why those who lie intentionally eventually find themselves not living in reality. IE our worst politicians.

[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Because it's easier than admitting it

load more comments
view more: next ›