this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
413 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3419 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

By calling America "dark," "depraved," and "irredeemable," the GOP speaker may as well be citing Al Qaeda's leader

In a video recorded just weeks before he ascended to his role as the most powerful Republican on Capitol Hill, Johnson filmed a video for the World Prayer Network with rabidly homophobic pastor Jim Garlow. As Frederick Clarkson has chronicled for Salon, Garlow is part of an apocalyptic Christian movement that wishes to end secular democracy and replace it with "a utopian biblical kingdom where only God's laws are enforced." (Which, of course, sounds much like bin Laden's hope for an Islamic caliphate.) Garlow asked Johnson if he felt that it was finally "a time of judgment for our collective sins."

To this, Johnson replied, "The culture is so dark and depraved that it almost seems irredeemable." As evidence, he noted how many young people identify as something other than straight.

Johnson's words echo those of bin Laden's "Letter to America: "We call you to be a people of manners, principles, honour, and purity; to reject the immoral acts of fornication, homosexuality, intoxicants, gambling's, and trading with interest."

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I am really not worried about Muslim terrorists in America.

I am really worried about the next Timothy McVeigh. There are crazy people on the right who think he did the right thing. It's only a matter of time before they emulate him.

With racist White dudes with guns doing mass shootings every month, the terrorists seem to be coming from inside the house.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Saw Ammon Bundy was in the news again recently, always give me more dread

[–] Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Major Ruby Ridge flashbacks with that one.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I sure hope so.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surprisingly, his reasoning for doing it, while wrong, was instigated by the Waco Siege, which was a pretty shitty thing for the government to do. Turns out when you attack a group of people, they get radicalized (even further than that group already was)

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Waco was fucked up long before the siege. It was just a tinderbox by design because those people were absolutely nuts.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you're missing the point. When the government decides to get violent with groups, it only leads to radicalization. Very rarely does it solve an issue.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Im Lakota, I'm pretty awake to it but that doesn't change the fact that it was a powder keg and the Branch Davidians were a death cult. There wasn't any outcome that wasn't going to be a lot of death and violence.

They were an apocalyptic cult, but not necessarily a death cult. Mind you they couldve evolved into a death cult with time, but thsy were generally pretty open which is not common in death cults.

But ill also note they needed to be dealt with, its just that the ATF and feds fucked it up massively trying to make up for Ruby Ridge. Seriously they couldve grabbed David Karesh at basically any other time, the fucker was a singer for a band they couldve grabbed him when he did a show.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no one who uses that creepy christian spying app should have power over others

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

I submit that it's mainly only fundies who use that, and the problem is the fundies themselves, who often love and are most familiar with high-control power structures.

And since Mike is former CoC (a child of Mormonism), this follows especially for him.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

People like this were fine with democracy when they were the majority and could get everything they wanted. As soon as they started to lose the popular vote they suddenly discovered how flawed the system was.

[–] Jessvj93@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same for prisons too, suddenly they're too harsh for MAGA nuts, yet they wanted it that way cause they get off on their moral high horse when they get to punish the "right" people.

[–] honey_im_meat_grinding@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Makes you think if we had some crazy-ass lottery based system where a few people out of the population would be randomly selected for a week-long placement in prison, the fear of being on the receiving end of that would turn the prison system into a Norwegian-style reformative system almost overnight – where prisoners are given student accommodation-esque rooms with access to their digital devices, friend and family visits with privacy in the room, normal looking on-site grocery shops, mental health care workers, and so forth, all culminating in a recidivism rate as low as 15% in their best prison.

[–] docAvid@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Nah. People suffer from too much just world fallacy. They'd never believe the lottery would select them, but they'd revel in seeing other people randomly get screwed. It'd be a very popular reality TV show.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Exactly this.

(Except suppression of black voters has been going on for centuries. Can't lose that majority.)

[–] docAvid@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Only quibble is, they were never the majority. It's too easy to underestimate just how imbalanced our "democracy" was, and to a large extent, remains. But, we're getting better, slowly, s l o w l y . . .

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago

The American Taliban are very real and they're chomping at the bit to take over. And it will be every bit as ugly as it is in Afghanistan.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

They call them y’all-queda for a reason