this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
86 points (100.0% liked)

World News

488 readers
473 users here now

Please help and contribute as we vote on rules:
https://quokk.au/post/21590

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pastasallad@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Overall, the deal involves as many as 180 tanks

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Any hot war is going to expend that in weeks or less. Laudable perhaps to describe war as insane - but not exactly realistic.

[–] juan@lemmings.world 7 points 1 month ago

180 tanks in a week? No way.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

NATO military doctrine doesn't require as many tanks has the Soviet doctrine, which Russia is still using, does.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So, what - do you think this is just mismanagement of funds? Possibly to meet the minimum defense spending, I suppose. It could be.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Well it's the military, so mismanagement of funds is a given. But that's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying that this number was probably aligned with the rest of NATO already, and that NATO doesn't expect to lose 180 tanks by driving them single-file on a highway.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's 180 in that first batch. Contract apparently is for 1,000. With a joint effort of production, so the last batch will be fully assembled in Poland.

[–] Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This reads like a press release for the tank itself.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

What do you expect from a right wing propaganda rag?

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 points 1 month ago

They made the mistake of being underprepared in 1939; they’re not going to make it again.

[–] DreamAccountant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Polish had an extremely fine cavalry before WWII. Plenty of troops. They even had some decent tanks. That wasn't the problem.

The problem was that they didn't adapt to the changing nature of 20th Century mobile warfare fast enough.

Tanks in Ukraine have a very different role than they did in WWII. Russia used to have the largest stockpile of tanks on the planet. Used to. Not anymore. Were they all used to capture huge tracts of land? Nope. Picked off by mines, artillery, bazookas, and drones in futile assaults.

Poland should be in the news, but for increasingly becoming a far-right state fueled by their weird religious hate.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Poland‘s main problem in WW2 was being attacked by two stronger armies from two sides. Resupply over the Baltic Sea was also not really feasible.

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh goody, a proxy war between north and south?

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

North helping Russia, south helping Poland. (Next phase of war supposedly)

[–] omgitsaheadcrab@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

They were being sarcastic

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I think tactical drones are more of an investment in modern warfare. But tanks are cool too.