this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
23 points (76.7% liked)

News

22962 readers
4541 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When the public asks, “How did we get here?” after each mass shooting, the answer goes beyond National Rifle Association lobbyists and Second Amendment zealots. It lies in large measure with the strategies of firearms executives like Dyke. Long before his competitors, the mercurial showman saw the profits in a product that tapped into Americans’ primal fears, and he pulled the mundane levers of American business and politics to get what he wanted.

Dyke brought the AR-15 semi-automatic rifle, which had been considered taboo to market to civilians, into general circulation, and helped keep it there. A folksy turnaround artist who spun all manner of companies into gold, he bought a failing gun maker for $241,000 and built it over more than a quarter-century into a $76 million business producing 9,000 guns a month. Bushmaster, which operated out of a facility just 30 miles from the Lewiston massacre, was the nation’s leading seller of AR-15s for nearly a decade. It also made Dyke rich. He owned at least four homes, a $315,000 Rolls Royce and a helicopter, in which he enjoyed landing on the lawn of his alma mater, Husson University.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (6 children)

You know... I don't care that it isn't an assault rifle. I don't care that it isn't the type of gun used most often in mass killings.

People fetishize it and it's weird.

Since I keep getting told that guns are tools, I'd feel the same if a bunch of people treated a certain brand of cordless drill with holy reverence.

[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The AR-15 is just popular because it's the honda civic of rifles and people fetishize it for the same reason highschool car guys fetishize honda civics. It's cheap, ubiquitous, and you can modify it to do basically anything you want. You can get an AR-15 chambered in anything from a .17 varmint round up to .50 Beowulf if you really want. You can slap basically any attachment or replacement part you can think of on it and it will just work. It's also fairly robust so maintenance isn't a huge concern. It's just a generic, cheap, and highly versitile platform. As far as "big bad guns" go the AR-15 isn't anywhere close to the top of that list. To anyone who actually knows about guns the AR-15 is basically the great value brand rifle. It's what you buy when you don't know what you actually want.

You also have a bit of the glock phenomenon going on. It became a thing a while back where a lot of people just started calling all handguns glocks even if they weren't actually Glock handguns. Similarly now you have people calling any black rifle with a handguard and a picatinny rail an AR-15 even if it's not even close to an AR-15.

[–] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Since I keep getting told that guns are tools, I'd feel the same if a bunch of people treated a certain brand of cordless drill with holy reverence.

I mean, people DO do that...

The time of the Stoner platform was coming, one way or another. It's effectively open source at this point and home manufacturing has exploded.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Okay, well like I said, if people treat a certain brand of cordless drill with holy reverence to the point that churches hold cordless drill services, that's weird as fuck too.

[–] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I wouldn't be shocked if there's some rural churches that do that kind of thing...

Wasn't there a church in Lake Oswego, OR USA that raffled off an AR-15 not that long ago?

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Since I keep getting told that guns are tools, I’d feel the same if a bunch of people treated a certain brand of cordless drill with holy reverence.

The AR-15 is the pickup truck of guns.

Most people don't use its capacities. A few have genuine appreciation for its finer details, a larger number just think it 'looks neat' and doesn't care beyond that, and a very large number just own it because it makes them feel like Big Men™.

[–] holycrapwtfatheism@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

I get your point but in the example the AR-15.. is the cordless drill, not a brand. Tons of brands make variants/parts for the platform.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The AR-15 was designed as a main battle rifle for light infantry. The rounds are designed to do a fair bit of extra damage. Other than that, it's only good for small game or target shooting. .22lr is just as capable for civilian use, rounds are cheaper, lighter and are used in more firearms.

Yes it has had a long life as the main battle rifle of the US, abd Canada uses a variant (I was trained on it when I was in the Navy) but it having the following that it does kinda confuses me.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's by definition not a battle rifle. It's a rifle taken into battle sure but it's an assault rifle with roots in the sturmgewehr 44 literally "assault rifle 44".

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

The people who "fetishize" it most are all the terminally online antigunners. I seriously see daily posts on Lemmy about the evils of this particular weapons design. Meanwhile I own several and during an average week I don't think about them at all.

That article has many incorrect statements and assumptions. The original Colt/Armalite was marketed towards the public but it wasn't initially popular with consumers because it started off expensive and it was a design departure from what they were used to (polymer instead of wood). Today there are a bunch of reasons the rifle design is popular. Due to how patents work, it is effectively Open Source at this point. 100+ companies make versions of it, or compatible parts. Therefore it is cheap and widely available.

Same thing with the Glock 19. It isn't necessarily better or different than most other autoloading handguns on the market. Its patent expired so it became an "Open" design, cheaper and customizable.