this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
87 points (94.8% liked)

News

30965 readers
2903 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zykino@programming.dev 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

May be the first or second time ever I'm seeing this:

451: Unavailable due to legal reasons

We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and therefore access cannot be granted at this time. For any issues, contact help@purdueexponent.org or call 765-743-1111.

[–] Wolfizen@pawb.social 10 points 8 hours ago

Apparently this message used to be common when GDPR first came into force.

Also, I love that the response code is 451. It's meant to replace a generic "404" for content unavailable specifically due to legal reasons. And of course 451 is referring to Ray Bradbury's book of the same name.

[–] NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

They only see the impression of the object in the sand now because some billionaire snagged it and is hoarding it in his lair.

[–] ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If only it was this easy go find MH370. (And by easy I mean happening to look at apple maps sat images and find an anomaly.)

I think MH370 may be found some day, but our underwater autonomous drone game will have to move up a generation or two.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Comparing MH370 to Earhart's plane is like comparing a muzzle loaded black powder canon to a GAU-8, two things that are technically in the same class but are on opposite ends of technological advancements. Earhart's plane was a prop plane that at worst would've been reduced to mangled scrap metal, MH370 on the otherhand was a passanger jet that at best would e been reduced to mangled scrap metal at worst it would've been effectively disintegrated with only the most durable elements holding up.

I doubt we will find anything more substantial than a flap or maybe a reinforced section of MH370, maybe a bag or suitcase on the smaller end. The only exception would be if it ran until put of fuel then glided until impact with the ocean or land, but even then it'd probably be pretty badly damaged and hard to identify.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Passenger planes are mostly aluminium. It's not likely to "disintegrate" all that much anytime soon. Also, a bunch of MH370 already washed up on the shores of Africa.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

When I say disintegrated I meant it in more of as it's root, not atomized but reduced to a basic level from its whole. Bits and pieces washing up in Africa is about what I'd expect but I doubt theres much more that a couple shredded chunks of the main body. Aluminum can break down pretty thoroughly under the right forces, speed and surface tension would be more than enough IMO.

Remember we're still finding WW2 era ships that we know roughly where they were when they sank and those are massive behemoths an aluminum scrap heap would be easily missed in comparison.