this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
528 points (98.2% liked)

politics

24875 readers
3178 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 32 points 6 days ago (2 children)

“Politicians are a lot like diapers. They should be changed frequently, and for the same reasons.”

― Mark Twain

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Mark Twain was a gold mine of using wordplay to say politicians are full of shit.

I also love "Imagine you are a congressman. And imagine you are an idiot - but I repeat myself"

[–] Gaylactus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I'll never forget that one congressman that asked if a woman could swallow one of those pill cameras used to diagnose problems with the digestive system, if that pill could come out from a woman's vagina instead. I think that's the dumbest shit I ever heard a US congressman say.

Politicians are a lot like Kristi Noem's dog.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Very slowly, it started on his birth

[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 17 points 6 days ago

Will there even be consequences?

No?

Well then. So what?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hey I know dementia isn't a voluntary condition but I can't help but believe it is karmic that the orange his showing signs of it

he was a pedo way before dementia, the only injustice is how little he suffered in life

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Did he ever really have it, though?

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 6 points 5 days ago

LoL you have TDS!

-Someone who's been to 50+ Trump Rallies!

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 days ago

Sleepy donald

[–] groovyplane@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

This is the classic Krasnov 4D chess maneuver, that is far beyond our mere mortal consciousness, right?!

[–] linkshulkdoingit69@lemmy.nz 3 points 6 days ago

the confusion sets in

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 72 points 1 week ago (12 children)

There should be a mandatory retirement age of 70 for all 3 branches.

Turning 70 before your potential 4 yr term would be up? Then you cannot run. Same for the senate. We would know ahead of time which Presidential term would be replacing SCOTUS, unless that justice chose to retire early.

[–] Rivalarrival 4 points 6 days ago

Make it the median life expectancy, rather than a fixed, 70 years.

For the court, leave it at a life term, but remove the size constraint. At the end of the first and third year of every presidential term, add one new justice. This moves the appointment process to a fixed time, so there are no surprises.

When a justice dies or retires, their seat is removed, not filled. This ensures that an untimely death swings only one seat, not two.

Since there is no longer an incentive for strategic retirement, the size of the court will increase, probably to around 13 justices. Presidents will want the absolute youngest justices they can get through the Senate.

The larger size means that whatever swing the court does have from deaths or retirements will be smaller and less impactful than it is now.

Finally, any circuit court justice has already faced senate confirmation hearings for their current appointment. Any circuit court judge should be eligible to be elevated to the supreme court without an additional senate confirmation. If the Senate wants to play games and reject all of the president's candidates, the president has a small pool of candidates that can bypass the additional confirmation process

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 47 points 1 week ago

Struck down immediately by a senile supreme Court.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] havocpants@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Losing it" ? The guy never had it! His speeches have been word salad and lies for at least 10 years.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

"Clean coal" "its my favorit food" - donald trump (defenetly not cut together)

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Ah yes, the monthly "Trump is senile" post. Been going since 2016.

Should we meet back here in another ten years when he's on his fourth term without consequence or care from anyone in power?

[–] Yaztromo@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

It reminds me of all of the “Fidel Castro is secretly close to death” news articles that showed up in the 80s and 90s. I suppose the predictions were eventually correct — but I’m not sure that predicting “sucks is gonna die” 30+ years out from his actual death was particularly useful.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 1 week ago

Man he's had signs of dementia for a long while now. What makes these signs any more impactful than previous ones?

[–] msprout@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I saw a clip of Trump speaking in 2020 this morning as I did my daily video catch-up over coffee, and it really struck me how much sicker he looks now compared to just 5 years ago, where he already looked like a wet mop on a clothing line.

I know the Presidency ages you, but that's regular presidents who work. Something else is aging this guy this quickly.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›