this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
376 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3989 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The wife of the New York judge overseeing former President Trump’s ongoing civil fraud trial is the latest target of Trump’s rage online.

Trump took aim at Judge Arthur Engoron’s wife in a series of posts Tuesday afternoon, purporting that an account on X — formerly Twitter — that made several anti-Trump posts belongs to her.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 100 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Trump basically wants this judge to snap and or get really harsh with him. Even though the judge would 100% be in the right, Trump will use the harsh penalties as miscarriage of justice ammo in an appeals case.

IMHO, this guy needs to continue doing what he has mostly already done. Don’t take the bait.

Edit: typos

[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

take the bate.

I think that's what Louis C.K. said before he'd do what he did.

[–] AmberPrince@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No appellate court would side with Trump. It's for his base.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No sane court would. But the last president appointed some real kooks to a lot of courts.

I could see Trump trying to get an injunction against the ruling pending appeal. Even a sane court would need to allow time for discovery, arguments, etc. Any material (in the way of snark or comments from the judge could mean added delays. Trump would definitely slow walk the appeal as much as possible on the hope that he’ll get reelected and pull some nonsense to wriggle out of consequences.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] squiblet@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bazus1@lemmy.world 91 points 11 months ago (2 children)

4D chess. I didn't realize that I can win a court case by insulting the judge and his family, and then appeal it and say, "See? The judge was prejudiced against me because I behaved like an asshole!"

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I get your sarcasm, but don't think any judge would want to take that appeal. Why subject yourself or your colleagues to this kind of abuse. Not sure exactly how that whole process goes, but really doubt there's any way all his bullshit works out to his benefit.

[–] charliespider@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (3 children)

What about maga-friendly judges?

They could take the case, rule in trump's favour, and get sweet sweet fascist cred.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They'd be top of the Supreme Court Justice list the second Republicans gain the majority again

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Man, we have to be getting real close to the straw... especially when they keep loading anvils on this flattened fucker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Idk. You'd think even they would see how trump throws even close allies under the bus not even for cause but just to distract or get himself back in the news. Should be obvious, but maybe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bazus1@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I get your honesty. I'd love to be a fly on the wall in any of The Cheeto's meetings with council, and hear the advice (or protestation) they're giving him. I suppose we all just need to wait long enough - there have been and will be many personal narrative books published about this slow-moving train wreck.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Step 0 of this plan is to pay off the appeals judges all the way up to the SC

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 47 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Ladies and Gentlemen, our former president. A pussy bitch that only knows how to talk shit on the internet.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

With this guy? Always has been.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 41 points 11 months ago (2 children)

“Judge Engoron’s Trump Hating wife, together with his very disturbed and angry law clerk, have taken over control of the New York State Witch Hunt Trial aimed at me, my family, and the Republican Party,” Trump wrote Wednesday in a Truth Social post.

Well, that's not going to go well for his gag order ...

[–] Mercival@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A gag order has since been lifted. Whether it's the one that would cover this, I have no bloody clue.

And frankly the fact, you even need to think about which gag order is in effect, is some peak trash reality TV drama. Which figures.

[–] venusenvy47@reddthat.com 26 points 11 months ago

It was just reinstated, but probably just after he posted this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Brokkr@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well if wives are fair game, the Thomas's are going to have a rough time.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

they would have to have some kind of shame.. or a shred of dignity left to care. they dont.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Plus they wouldn't receive constant threats of violence and death. That mostly just comes from one side. Whoever tweeted about would be in danger.

[–] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 34 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] DrWyrm@ttrpg.network 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hey you, get back here!

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Narrator: He did. Several, in fact.

[–] Dreadnaught@sh.itjust.works 23 points 11 months ago

I have a hard time believing that someone innocent would do this.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Definitely a great strategy to go after the judge's wife in a bench trial.

And again, it shows that Trump is just above the law. If anyone else did that they'd be in Rikers for the remainder of the trial.

[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Trump's lawyer to appeals court judges after verdict:

"Your honor, my client and myself constantly, publicly and viciously attacked the trial judge, his staff, the opposing counsel, and their families, including making many demonstrably false libelous statements. They all received many death threats on a daily basis as a result of our actions. Therefore you must overturn the verdict because he must have been biased against us by our own actions."

Yeah we'll see how that plays out in the appeals courts. I didn't think even republican partisan hack judges will buy that. We'll find out soon I guess though.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 7 points 11 months ago

I've seen chutzpah defined as "that quality enshrined in a man who, having killed his mother and father, throws himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan."

Same energy here.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (9 children)

For him? I guarantee it.
What other consequences has he ever faced for anything he's said, other than a gag order he knows they won't enforce?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If I were going off these posts alone, I would conclude that trump immediately violated the gag order today?

I mean it's very believable...but I'm hoping it's just weird timing of the posts and he stfu for at least a couple hours.

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 17 points 11 months ago

Probably not. The gag order is extremely narrow. It excludes Engoron himself and I don't think his wife is court staff.

According to the article, Trump also posted that yesterday.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A new day and a new low for the Coward in Chief.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

He could shoot her in the middle of 5th avenue and the judge still wouldn't enforce a gag order.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Won't someone rid me of this turbulent judge?

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Oh and don't forget the wife.

And their little dog too

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago

So he's trying to tell the DC court of appeals that they should uphold his gag order. Good.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

. . . the New York State Witch Hunt Trial aimed at me, my family, and the Republican Party,”

Madness. republiQans you sad, hateful jokes.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 11 months ago

An important note:

“The Twitter account with the handel [sic] @dm_sminxs does not belong to me. I do not have a Twitter account. I have never posted any anti Trump messages,” she wrote in an email.

load more comments
view more: next ›