Are these consequences in the room with us right now?
Show us on the doll where the consequences touched you.
They go to a different school. You wouldn't know them.
This school also happens to be in Canada.
Thanks for the giggle.
Maybe they're like the Picture of Dorian Gray and the consequences get remand/custody, not Trump. Wonder how it'll end?
I can't help but notice that the article never laid out what the immediate consequences were.
Because the only consequence I can see was that the gag order was reinstated. Not exactly a huge punishment.
the gag order that in no way has shown consequence for his ignoring it.
The pittance level fines are the only “consequence”.
A fine is just a cost of business for the wealthy.
Worse, he’ll probably try to write these off as marketing expenses. Since that’s what he’s using it for that might actually be more legit than any of the other bullshit he’s been telling the IRS for decades.
Plus a double dip by billing it to the campaign.
Yes
Trump's 48-Hour Manic Rant
You're gunna have to be more specific
Yeah the last 8-9 years of 48 hour rants.
You mean there has been breaks?
Sometimes he's asleep.
That two tier justice system really showing right now.
Can we make drug testing a part of the election process? I could normally give a shit but I'm curious just how many uppers this man's on.
It's called rampant narcissism. Unfortunately it is a brain defect with no treatment except for public humiliation.
Unfortunately it is a brain defect with no treatment except for public humiliation.
That's not completely true. Antoine Louis, a French doctor, has developed a revolutionary protocol for treating this defect. It showed highly encouraging results in its first round of human testing.
Thought it was gonna end up being a lobotomy, but that's good too. Or just make politicians take a yearly psychologist assisted psychedelic dosing regimen.
I suggest you "treat" a random 10% of them each year. Should prune the crop to a manageable level.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News