this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
756 points (96.8% liked)

Science Memes

11068 readers
2999 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
756
i <3 statistics (mander.xyz)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
 

Disclaimer: This is a joke. Ecofascism is obviously bad, kids. Don't be that guy.

https://theconversation.com/8-billion-people-why-trying-to-control-the-population-is-often-futile-and-harmful-194369

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 109 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Don't do this, but remember: the richer a person is, the bigger the ecological footprint. You are higher on that list than you might realize. Especially ecofascists tend to forget that fact.

[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 53 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Yeah you know what would actually be better? Fixing legislation so that the 100 companies that create the majority of pollution stop doing that

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Lmmfao, yeah good luck with that.. (hint: the people who own those companies also own the government who makes the laws, there is no reforming capitalism, it's designed that way)

[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't disagree with this but the offered alternative is checks notes GENOCIDE

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zorque@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They own the people in government, not the government itself. Change the people, change the ownership.

The trick is you have to start small, cause the ones in the bigger positions rely on the small ones to maintain their power.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago

Even better than that is changing the system so the 100 companies are no longer around to create a majority of pollution.

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

The statistic that "Just 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions" is better understood as "Just 100 companies responsible for selling 71% of global fossil fuels". It's fundamentally saying that there's a few large coal, oil and gas companies worldwide selling us most of the supply.

If you want those companies to stop polluting, that amounts to those companies not selling fossil fuels.

Which is honestly the goal, but the only way to do that is to replace the demand for fossil fuels. Cutting the US off from fossil fuels would kill a ton of people if you didn't first make an energy grid 100% powered by renewables, got people to buy electric cars, cold climate heat pumps, etc.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hh93@lemm.ee 21 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Yeah - everyone is shitting on the top 1% here in Germany until they realize that half the population here makes it into that percentile and suddenly it's the 0,1% that's the problem.

It's all about putting the blame on someone else so you don't have to question if you might be a little bit responsible, too, with your lifestyle...

[–] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 11 months ago

Half the population of Germany makes it into the global 1%? So 40 million Germans are in the 1%, a group that is 80 million people in the world?

People severely estimate how many Westerners there are. The US alone is like 4 or 5% of the world population. If you're in the west, you're in the top 15% of the world, but not likely the top 1%

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Especially ecofascists

Do you think so-called “ecofascists” are unaware of their contributions to climate change? Or do you just assume that based on their behavior?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You could make a religion out of this

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 36 points 11 months ago (6 children)

I feel like this argument is way too imprecise, to the point of being basically untrue. That's probably based on the average emissions or something like that, but people are not the same and "emission responsibility" is wildly different.

Imagine killing 34k exploited African people, the world's climate won't even notice that. On the other hand, killing 34k middle class Americans or Europeans would probably be a little more effective, but still won't fix anything. Now, killing 34k high-profile megacorp executives would definitely be much more effective, but would also collapse some economies, leading to various climate unfriendly events (like riots, war and shit).

But the simplest empirical evidence is: COVID killed 6 million people and the climate is still shit.

Source: I made it the fuck up, I'm talking out of my ass

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It looks like my ass is very knowledgeable. Definitely a good source

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Bullshit.

The investments of just 125 billionaires emit 393 million tonnes of CO2e each year – the equivalent of France – at an individual annual average that is a million times higher than someone in the bottom 90 percent of humanity.

That is to say, if you multiply the emissions of the gasoline sold by ExxonMobil by whatever percentage of ExxonMobile that's in Bill Gate's portfolio, you get an absolutely ridiculous emissions number.

But that seems to assume that if it weren't for those dastardly billionaires investing in oil companies, we'd all be living in 10-minute cities with incredible subways connected by high speed rail, powered entirely by renewables, and heated by geothermal heat pumps. And I honestly don't beleive that.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Risk@feddit.uk 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The meme is about saving oxygen, not reducing CO² emissions.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 5 points 11 months ago

I kind of appreciate your sourcing. The same citation is used by many, without disclosure.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ayy, you had me at "killing 34k high-profile megacorp executives". 🤌🏼 Got a newsletter?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

There's no need to kill anyone. As our climate collapses, that'll start to happen on its own

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 19 points 11 months ago

Yeah but the people that will be dying won’t be the ones with the biggest carbon footprints. It’ll be climate migrants from underdeveloped areas or island nations.

That’s the saddest part.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A lot of it won't happen on its own though. While direct deaths from climate-related things (floods, fires, wet bulb events, whatever) will happen, you can bet your ass that there'll be a lot of murderizing too.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] angrymouse@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago (7 children)

You are talking about the average ppl. Probably 10 billionaires would have the same impact.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

Israel's new propaganda wave: "We're just environmentalists."

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Killing one or two people would have a substantially bigger impact if you get the right one or two people. So if you're gonna, choose wisely

[–] zifnab25@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is the eugenicist's dilemma. You very rarely meet one who would advocate euthanizing themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucien@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

Sort by net worth descending and go from the top

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 18 points 11 months ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Trees are actually oxygen neutral for most of their lives, their main purpose is in sequestering carbon.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 13 points 11 months ago

Contraception is the morally ok way.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Even if we planted a trillion trees it would only have a tiny affect on climate change. Same with killing large amounts of people. The only way we combat climate change effectively is getting off fossil fuels.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CJOtheReal@ani.social 9 points 11 months ago

But it would significantly reduce all waste and carbon as well!

Remember: we don't have a lack of oxygen, we have a surplus of Greenhouse Gases and trash... So less humans is the way to go...

[–] Gymcap 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

To take it seriously:
No it wouldn't; time exists.

[–] benjiman@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Are we concerned about the amount of oxygen available now?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Well it did cause the first and largest mass extinction event so far......

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Good Guy Putin sending waves of Russians to die in Ukraine was just trying to help the environment all along.

[–] SapphireVelvet84839@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

CIA operative John Clark forms a top-secret international counterterrorist organization known as Rainbow. Formed to combat the proliferation of formerly state-sponsored terrorist groups gone rogue after the Cold War, and based in Hereford, England, Rainbow consists of two operational squad-sized teams of elite special forces soldiers from NATO countries, supplemented by intelligence and technology experts from the FBI, MI6, and Mossad. Clark serves as Rainbow's commanding officer (callsign "Rainbow Six"), SAS officer Alistair Stanley serves as their second-in-command, and Clark's son-in-law Domingo Chavez leads Team-2.

In their first deployment, Team-2 rescues hostages during a bank robbery in Bern, Switzerland. Several weeks later, they are deployed to Austria, where German left-wing terrorists have taken over the schloss of a wealthy Austrian businessman to obtain (nonexistent) "special access codes" to the international trading markets. They are later deployed to the Worldpark amusement park in Spain, where Basque revolutionaries have taken a group of children hostage and demand that various prisoners, including Carlos the Jackal, be released.

Clark and his colleagues become suspicious about the sudden rise in terrorist attacks. Unbeknownst to them, the attacks are part of an intricate plan to wipe out nearly all of humanity, codenamed "the Project". Dr. John Brightling, a staunch radical environmentalist who heads a biotechnology firm called the Horizon Corporation, ordered the attacks through ex-KGB officer Dmitriy Popov to raise concerns of terrorism, allowing co-conspirator Bill Henriksen's security firm Global Security to land a key contract for the Olympic Games in Sydney, Australia. Henriksen would then ensure the release of "Shiva"—a manmade Ebola biological agent more deadly than the one that spread a year prior, developed by Horizon and tested on kidnapped human test subjects—through the fog-cooling system of Stadium Australia, infecting almost everyone present, who would then return to their home countries, spreading Shiva across the world. The resulting pandemic would kill countless people, during which Horizon would distribute a "vaccine"—actually a slow-acting version of Shiva—ensuring the deaths of the rest of the world's population. Brightling's "chosen few", having been provided with the real vaccine, would then inherit the emptied world, justifying their genocidal actions as "saving the world" from the environmentally-destructive nature of humanity.

Popov discovers the existence of Rainbow as he reviews the "police tactical teams" (actually Rainbow in disguise) that responded to his attacks, and brings it to Brightling's attention. Brightling and Henriksen order Popov to orchestrate an attack on Rainbow to prevent them from being deployed to the Sydney Olympics. Popov persuades a team of breakaway drug-dealing Provisional Irish Republican Army militants to attack a hospital near Rainbow's base and capture Clark and Chavez's wives, who work there as a nurse and a doctor respectively. When Rainbow arrives, a team of IRA militants ambush them, killing two Team-1 troopers and injuring several others, including Stanley. Despite sustaining their first-ever losses, Rainbow manages to repel the ambush, retake the hospital without further casualties, and capture some of the militants. Using trickery to interrogate the captured militants, Clark and Chavez learn of Popov's involvement, while Brightling evacuates Popov to Horizon's OLYMPUS facility in Kansas.

However, this turns out to be a fatal miscalculation: Popov was unaware of the genocidal plans of his employers, but the people at OLYMPUS talk openly about them. Learning the truth about the Project, Popov, appalled by what he had unknowingly assisted, escapes and reveals his knowledge to Clark and the FBI, who were already investigating the kidnappings of the Shiva test subjects. Popov's warning comes just in time for Chavez and Team-2, who were deployed to the Olympics to provide security, to thwart Shiva's release at the last minute.

Their plans in shambles, Brightling and the remaining Project members flee to a smaller Horizon base in the Amazon rainforest near Manaus, Brazil. Clark personally leads Rainbow to the base, where they kill the guards, demolish the buildings, disable communications, and round up the remaining Project members. Knowing there is insufficient evidence to convict them and that they would just restart their plans if freed, Clark instead has the survivors stripped naked and left to fend for themselves in the jungle, taunting them to "reconnect with nature".

Six months later, Chavez reads news articles about Popov (who was pardoned in exchange for his information) discovering a gold deposit on a Project member's former property, and Horizon's revolutionary medical breakthroughs under new management. Chavez asks if the Project members survived; Clark informs him that no human activity has been detected in the area since, and remarks that nature does not distinguish between friends and enemies. Wondering who humanity's natural enemy must be, Chavez determines it must be humanity itself.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought of this

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 4 points 11 months ago

Climate Refugee is confused!

It saved oxygen in it's confusion.

[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why are there so many sig figs in the amount of people killed vs. the trees planted?

[–] overzeetop@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

The humans number was probably converted from metric.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Sure, but what about killing all people? That's where we're heading, and a lot of people are choosing to help with that. (I'm not saying that makes it ok, just asking for the fun of it).

load more comments
view more: next ›