this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
101 points (99.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

62574 readers
859 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

wow just wow while i can't say i didn't see this one coming but it always amazes me where greed could lead someone

(page 4) 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lix_xD@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

What about things like newpipe, invidious, feetube etc?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I really don't think it's greed. Can't blame em for trying to win the cat/mouse game of adblocking. I'm sure it's not the end of the world, and new ways to circumvent this will show up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I will still use invidious while having muy subscriptions saved as RSS feeds so this change will go over my head

[–] mr_right@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

let me bring you up to speed a couple days ago YouTube legal team threatened invidious devs saying they are abusing their API ToS ( trems of service ) which the devs said that the claim does not hold any truth to it since invidious is just youtube proxy\scraper and does not depend on API

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (14 children)

Not the main point, but this is the first time I've seen "allowlisted". Lol

...are they trying to avoid saying whitelisted because of the word "white"?

load more comments (14 replies)

“Allowlisted”?

Are we not allowed to say white/black anymore?

[–] PatFussy@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago

Revanced it is

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›