this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
207 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19159 readers
5079 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ambassadors to Washington warn that the GOP-Democratic divide is endangering America’s national security.

When I asked the European ambassador to talk to me about America’s deepening partisan divide, I expected a polite brushoff at best. Foreign diplomats are usually loath to discuss domestic U.S. politics.

Instead, the ambassador unloaded for an hour, warning that America’s poisonous politics are hurting its security, its economy, its friends and its standing as a pillar of democracy and global stability.

The U.S. is a “fat buffalo trying to take a nap” as hungry wolves approach, the envoy mused. “I can hear those Champagne bottle corks popping in Moscow — like it’s Christmas every fucking day.”

As voters cast ballots in the Iowa caucuses Monday, many in the United States see this year’s presidential election as a test of American democracy. But, in a series of conversations with a dozen current and former diplomats, I sensed that to many of our friends abroad, the U.S. is already failing that test.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 85 points 9 months ago (40 children)

The whole world feels like losing a big brother to the agony of drug addiction, forced to watch all the stupid decisions that impact millions of lives across the globe.

It's such a hurtful thing, as someone who experienced the optimism of the nineties, when the cold war appeared to be over. It's been downwards from there, through Bush all the way up to Trump.

Get well big bro. Pull through, pls.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 67 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Crazy that the red scare happened in America but now, now they're just playing into foreign takeovers. I guess hollowing out education and starving the population worked.

Idiots, absolute idiots.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Conservatives, absolute conservatives.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah it seems like every time a decision on education comes up THIS party is all "more money for education and teachers, better working condi-" and the OTHER party is all "fuck that we want a make-believe jet fighter, and new coal plants - money taken!"

And I'm not talking about the last ten or twenty or thirty years. I mean the last fifty at the very least.

This is why the "both sides bad" and "baby Dems big mad @ Biden lolz" is classic russian troll meat. It's really. that. simple. Democratic supermajorities across the country, we'll fix this shit. Or, y'know, stay the course.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Can't describe how stupid it is Russian Propaganda is just repackaged conservative media.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oDDmON@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago

There’s a growing sense among foreign diplomats that moral or national security arguments — about defending a country unjustly invaded, deterring Russia, preventing a bigger war in Europe and safeguarding democracy — don’t work on the American far-right.

50 years ago the far right fought the “Red Menace “, today they embrace it. /smh

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 37 points 9 months ago (1 children)

GOP in 2016 = We need to elect Trump because the world is laughing at us.

GOP in 2024 = Who cares what the rest of the world thinks about us?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They stopped caring the second Trump got elected and the whole world turned against us except for Putin and his cronies.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They quite obviously never cared. Obama was more respected among America's allies than any president since JFK or some shit. Meanwhile their candidate was globally treated as a fucking joke.

Not even a funny joke - one of those racist sexist jokes your drunk stepfather tells. And the Kremlin were the only ones laughing.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Remember when they muddied the waters claiming Hilary was a pedophile because their guy hung out with the dude who ran a pedo ring.

Both sides, tho.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I always took it as a given that any American pol was in favor of the US being 'leader of the Free World.'

On the other hand, I always thought that the American voter would turn away from a guy who constantly spoke ill of America's veterans.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You can either claim to be leader of the free world or you can say you want to get rid of NATO.

It can't be both.

The first is still bullshit, but it definitely can't be both.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago

This is the analogy I've been using for years.

Richard Nixon's Southern Strategy gave the base beer. Ronald Reagan gave them grain alcohol punch, and Bush Jr. gave them straight moonshine. Trump gave them meth.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

The past decade of American politics has convinced the world there is merit in reducing reliance on the US and the next decade will reinforce that. The US economy is nothing if it cannot remain a competitive investment option for foreign dollars. Id wager the majority of the reason the fed jacked rates was to keep the dollar as a great investment for those foreign investors. The unemployment boost they said they were looking for didn't happen but they say they're done raising rates, so they did get something they wanted it seems.

And since American loves to import necessities, should those foreign investments halt and stop helping to keep the dollar competitive internationally, America will go from a third world country with shiny commodites, to a third world country with nothing but the largest military on earth.

Conditions like that give rise to even more authoritarian right wing populists who would end up assuming control of a country with a poor economy but immense military might. What do you think is going to happen? Because my guess is exactly what Russia is doing now. That is what is at risk for the future of a US that doesn't get it's shit together. If you think stopping Russias military is hard, Imagine the USA decides it's time to leverage military might for economic gain.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Imagine the USA decides it’s time to leverage military might for economic gain.

I see what you mean in general, but it's a bit funny to assume the US hasn't been leveraging its military for economic gain (see: the whole Mmiddle East).

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 12 points 9 months ago

A less controversial example is that the USA provides security for many shipping lanes. Few countries are in a position to do that currently.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Fair enough, but as it stands the US is tolerable as a security guarantor because they use that force "fairly" enough to other powerful states. Without other states invested in the US econ theres much less to lose and instead of protecting them, the US could easily use their existing global reach to extort anyone who needs that security, pay up or you're on your own. And that money would go right to the presumably despotic government, not even routed through multinationals that buy the government representatives. Neither is preferable, but if the government becomes nothing but a military, more money directly to them would likely cause more bad things.

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

fed jacked rates ... they did get something they wanted

Fewer loans issued by member banks means less new money entering the economy via private spending, which means the federal government can spend that much more money without impacting inflation. And there is plenty that needs to be bought, from pandemic related expenses, to scaling up weapons production in anticipation of WWIII, infrastructure modernization and other measures to encourage manufacturing to return from China to the American continent, and social programs to treat the worst mass poverty seen since the Great Depression.

load more comments
view more: next ›