this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
463 points (93.3% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3079 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 133 points 1 year ago (4 children)

She put my recent thoughts into words: they simply can NOT admit that they were wrong about Trump, especially since they've curated their new identity around him.

After all, many sacrificed their family life on the altar of Trump. If you make a stand for bigotry that's so rancid it drives your kids to sever contact, you have to believe it's in service of something higher or else come to grips with your own moral failings. I know which one I believe is more likely.

It's the rotten core of the anti-intellectual ideology that the right has been pushing for decades.

[–] flipht@kbin.social 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This. I can't solve this, and neither can any other individual person.

It will take a wide spread implosion, but they've got a resilient ecosystem that will just switch messianic figures out once Trump is no longer able to hold public sway.

[–] Zoboomafoo@yiffit.net 8 points 1 year ago

And if they don't switch, it may straight-up become religious

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Sunk Cost Fallacy for president

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Anti-intellectual theology as well. "God and Country" evangelical churches from the smallest to the largest find it absolutely crucial to brainwash their congregations against higher ed and critical thinking.

[–] Spacebar@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago (5 children)

"...the first rule of MAGA is to never, ever, under any circumstances, admit that liberals might be right about something."

People in cults stay in them for the same reasons. So many times, they were told they were wrong, that they couldn't take the embarrassment of making such a mistake.

Maybe MAGA people need to be coddled a bit. Tell them that Trump changed towards the end. They were right, but he betrayed them in the end. Something else should be tried. Many of these people are dangerous in the mental state their in.

[–] flipht@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe. But this just kicks the can down the road. They'll do the same shit with a new messiah figure as soon as they find one that can string two words together and make them feel like they're virtuous for their hatred.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mollycoddling them is what caused the problem in the first place. They need to be forced to accept responsibility for the choices they made even if it hurts them. Them entrenching themselves out of embarrassment is a moral failing on their part, not ours.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They need to be forced to accept responsibility

I won't hold my breath.

The only solution is the California model: vote them into powerlessness. They'll never change. Just leave them to their impotent rage while the rest of us move on.

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You forget that California actually allows for a fair amount of direct democracy - the South will cling to Republican government and will fight any movement toward direct democracy and ballot initiatives because every effort to appeal to their base would be defeated.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

True but if we get enough dems in office, we naturally progress towards stronger ballot measures. We can't do anything while Republicans are in office.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly, some people deserve to get exactly what they want, fuck em.

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He pretended to want to help them during his campaign. They fell for it and just ignored all facts and evidence since. Doubt they're going to see the light.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DoctorTYVM@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Clinton was right about everything. In 20 years its going to be really hard to explain why she wasn't the obvious choice who should have won by a landslide

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No it isn't. She wasn't relatable or likeable at all. People wanted an outsider and HRC is about as much of an insider as you could be.

[–] Yewb@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Where are the Bernie bros that dude would have won.

[–] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

We're depressed. Leave us out of this

[–] UristMcHolland@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I will never forgive the DNC

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

She wasn't relatable or likeable at all

Neither is Trump. Hillary was obviously the better choice.

[–] Cheers@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Hillary was obviously the better choice given the 2, but DNC shafted Bernie on record, which caused a lot of people to go 3rd party, against both RNC and DNC.

[–] Yewb@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump was relatable and likable to his supporters. Clinton couldn't say the same except for a small number of them. It's become tradition in the Democratic Party to hold your nose when you vote for president.

As an example of her lack of relatability and likeability, here she is chilling in Cedar Rapids and telling kids to Pokemon Go to the polls.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump is about as likeable as a rabid dingo. Clinton was better in absolutely every way to people with two neurons to rub together.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't take much to be better than Trump. Still, Clinton campaigned as if winning was a foregone conclusion and then she found out that it wasn't.

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Some of us remember the 90's, and the ubiquitous bumper stickers implying that while Bill was President, Hillary was in charge. Playing on sexist tropes, calling her a bitch of the canine variety, "I didn't vote for Hillary," "She's not my president," etc.. Hillary was well hated before she ever ran for President.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

People who want outsiders are, it turns out, dumb and wrong

[–] flipht@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's actually an easy explanation.

People were more concerned with a Democrat being likeable, after decades of character assassination, while they didn't care that the republican was a criminal, and also foreign interference and an FBI that was paralyzed by biased agents and management fear of appearing biased, actual outcomes be damned.

It was a perfect storm of regressive misinformation and every individual with the ability to stop the train wreck trying to cover their own asses and pass the buck instead.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wasn't this also the election that was heavily influenced by Cambridge Analytica? while Facebook being the biggest social media site in thebworld/us?

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I just want to also call out the Internet Research Agency, Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear: All Russian information groups, a disrupted our elections in one way or another through different types of social engineering, hacking, trolling and misinformation creation. They went after individualls, businesses, and government organizations, not limited to the DNC.

[–] 5in1k@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She didn’t even campaign in Michigan thinking it was a sure thing. She ran a terrible campaign.

[–] DoctorTYVM@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I'm sure that will be something people in 20years understand. She didn't campaign well enough so we elected a narcissistic sociopath who bragged about grabbing women by the genitals and then fucked our country into fascism.

But her emails...

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Everything is a bit of a stretch. She was certainly wrong about how she ran her campaign. Poisoning the well in the primary worked out so fucking well for her. It was her turn, she earned it. No reason to convince the voters to show up by campaigning, or creating a platform people were excited about. Just say how bad Bernie is, then how bad trump is a few times and hide.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

"Poisoning the well" aka "winning by 3 million votes"

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the DNC clearing the field for her looks really bad in hindsight. A lot would be different if Biden had run in 2016 when the whole Bidenbro phenomenon was really popular.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

This conclusion has been obvious for fucking decades.

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes but this gets us nowhere

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›