this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
823 points (98.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26838 readers
3397 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 110 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (14 children)

The mode human body contains enough bones to make an entire skeleton. The average human body doesn't have enough.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 36 points 10 months ago (5 children)

The additional ~200 bones from fetuses in late stage pregnant woman would be more than the missing bones from amputees etc. OPs statement is accurate.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t they be too small though?

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 13 points 10 months ago

Skeleton size or proportionality not specified.

[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You can’t use one unfused half-bone in place of one full bone >:(

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The word average can technically refer to arithmetic mean, median, mode, or range. That's why you were probably taught them at the same time. That's also why tests like the ACT tend to have a * at the top that says something along the lines of "Unless otherwise stated, the word average indicates arithmetic mean."

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have never in my life seen it refer to anything but the mean

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because mean is the most common form of average. But, for example, when referring to salaries, the words median and average are often used interchangeably.

[–] BA834024112@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This isn't true at all

Edit: well they may be used interchangebly, but they're also used incorrectly in that case

[–] MacNCheezus 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Actually, the average human body contains more than one skeleton.

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This depends entirely on how many people there are out there with missing limbs.

[–] MacNCheezus 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It would have to be a lot considering that a baby has a full set of bones while a missing limb is generally only a few of them.

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Half the bones in a adult human are in the hands and feet. I don't know if there's enough missing limbs to offset fetus skeletons but I there's a whole lot of bones missing in a double amputee.

[–] MacNCheezus 2 points 10 months ago

Babies have up to 270 bones at birth (instead of 206 in an adult), which makes up for at least one double amputee (hands have 27 bones and feet have 26 each).

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Different perspective: Even if you miss a limb your body contains the full 100% of the skeleton you can find in a person missing that limb.

There still complete human beings even if their body has a unique challenge.

[–] ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I appreciate what you're saying here - people come in all shapes and sizes, with different abilities, limb counts, etc. Every one is a human being deserving respect and dignity.

But OP didn't say "a complete human being" - it said "a complete human skeleton."

If an individual is missing a limb, by birth or by accident, they don't have a complete skeleton. It's a plain fact. Doesn't mean they are any less human.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Gigan@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

No it doesn't, because some people are missing limbs or ribs or have artificial joints. So the average body would have slightly fewer bones than necessary to make a whole skeleton.

[–] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 28 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Pregnant women would increase the average to greater than one complete skeleton per person.

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

But are those bones in the body of the pregnant woman, or is the body of the fetus a different set?

[–] JackOfAllTraits@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Same body, two sets

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

Even if you count the fetus as a human, the fetuses bones are still inside the pregnant woman. So there are still more than one skeleton on average inside humans.

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Oh, don't forget conjoined twins.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I was gonna say: who is out there rocking extra bones?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Probably false, the avarage probably has a bit less then needed fo a full skeleton.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Despite all the "AKcHUaLLy" comments this is probably true.

If the body has 206 bones and the global average is like 205.7, a bone that is even partially complete is still a bone, and it is probably so close to 206 that the missing parts are negligible and distributed across the skeleton anyway. Think about it, how many people do you know that are missing an appendage or a bone by defect? I bet it's less than 0.5% of everyone you know.

Take my upvote.

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I have 2 neighbours is missing a leg, and a family friend missing a finger. I am one of the outliers.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Did these people lose their limbs before or after they met you?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That is a lot of missing bones. How many people would you estimate that you know though? I went to a small high school and I bet out of 500 total I knew 300 just from school. There are lots of family and coworkers and stuff that drive that number pretty high even if you know some amputees.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Chef_Boyargee@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

I feel like there should be a joke in here about giving someone’s mom an extra bone last night

[–] NotMelon@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

HOW???!!! How is that possible? I blame illuminati for this.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Not true, average is higher than 1 entire skeleton.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Seudo@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Some people say there's a spooky skeleton inside you right now!

[–] tubaruco@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

technically, because noone has a higher amount of bones but many people have less, this is false.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Late stage pregnant woman have a higher amount of human bones

[–] tubaruco@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

finally someone that doesnt just tell me there is a very rare disease that creates a single extra bone

anyway yeah if you count pregnant women the average skeletons in a human body is more than one

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What about that one horrible disease where your muscles start turning into extra bones?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Eeew no! Geddit out!

[–] dipshit@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Surprising but true!

[–] lelgenio@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›