this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024

87 points (98.9% liked)

News

22876 readers

3951 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

More concerning than the nanoplastics in water bottles are the chemicals on them (www.latimes.com)

submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

They are used to give plastic products their distinctive durability, bendability and sleek, nonstick surface.

Yet some of these chemical additives have been tied to maladies such as breast and prostate cancer, heart disease and diabetes, as well as problems with children’s brain development and adult fertility.

Of particular concern are a class of additives known as endocrine disruptors — chemicals that mimic and confuse hormone signaling in humans.

Now, a team of physicians, epidemiologists and endocrinologists have estimated the costs of plastic exposure on the U.S. healthcare system and come to a sobering conclusion.

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

“What this study tries to do is to say” to plastic manufacturers that “‘it’s not just that you’re hurting people’s lives, it’s that you’re costing the economy. ... You are profiting as companies off the backs of people’s health and well-being,’” he said.

Plastic manufacturers and the companies who use those containers don't care what it does to us. They just don't want to be forced to spread manufacturing out, to save on increased transportation costs that would come from using glass containers instead.

But that's what gov'ts have to do to change anything ... shut down plastic usage and/or force those companies who use them to pay for the environmental damage and cost of healthcare.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

increased transportation costs that would come from using glass containers instead

So spend more gasoline to move an order of magnitude more weight around? Just weighed two roughly equivalent containers, ~6 fluid ounces each.

Glass: 105g

Plastic: 7g

(That measurement misses the metal lid on the glass container vs. a plastic lid or wrap. Add 10g and 1g to the totals.)

Ah, but I see you're proposing to spread manufacturing out some, save on shipping? So thousands of new glass plants splattered everywhere? The shipping costs sound more environmentally effective than splatting thousands of acres of forest, creating more heat islands, etc. And don't forget all the extra energy infrastructure to power those plants! But what do I know.

Say what you will about capitalism, but it finds ways to use money efficiently. And here's the thing people miss; Energy = MONEY. That equation exhibits the commutative property. Money = ENERGY.

I'm leaving out the increase in food costs to consumers. Like it isn't bad enough, we should add more? Also, are we going to add more burden to the people that have to lift and move all that glass?

Posted a time or two that sometime in the future our plastic use will be looked upon as vile, insane. I can rage forever on the subject. But we're not at a place in history to completely get around it. Not yet. Baby steps.

And BTW, I LOVE glass! I've made so many cool things out of waste. But fuck me, there's only so many drinking glasses, bowls, jewelry, etc., a man can make and use. I've got 300lbs of waste glass in the shed to work with, nowhere to put the finished product.

tl;dr: The only way we save this planet is renewable energy, and I include nuclear in that. Any other talk is missing the energy equation, missing the forest for the trees.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

It’s so hard to break away from plastics. I switched out my Tupperware to glass and use a stainless steel water jug while at work, but everything comes in plastic. My yogurt this morning? Plastic container. The package for my coffee filters? Plastic. The ground beef for dinner tonight? Styrofoam tray wrapped in plastic.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Which is worse- filtered water out of a bottle or tap water in a glass? I know you can filter tap water, but disregard that.

[–] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

You're also assuming that the bottle water is filtered. Some of those companies just bottle up tap water.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago

The unfiltered tap water vs bottled water debate is location dependent.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I live in NYC and the tap water is damn good.

[–] Kabaka@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Probably because of all the crustaceans.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Wait they are added in?

[–] visnae@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Unfiltered tap water is great, but we've got real fine tap water in Europe. When hiking I've drunken water directly from springs, no need to filter it.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Heck, even water filters can shit out nanoplastics

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

True but it’s likely to shit out less plastic than water bottles. The water is only in contact with the filtering medium for a short period where as bottled water is sitting there for weeks/months/years potentially sitting in direct sunlight.