To me, TERFs are the saddest group of all. They are literally inventing shit to be mad at. That bussy ain't for you Marta! I'll take a bit though.
this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
213 points (94.6% liked)
Gay: News, Memes and Discussion
1882 readers
363 users here now
Welcome to /c/Gay - Your LGBTQ+ Haven
We're more than just a community; we're your haven for celebrating LGBTQ+ culture and connecting with like-minded individuals.
Community Rules:
~ 1. No bigotry. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.
~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.
~ 4. Keep it LGBTQ+ related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.
~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love posts but 3-4 in an hour is plenty enough.
~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.
~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Can one be a TERF without being a RF?
Yes. It's called being a transphobic bigot.
The TE part contradicts the RF part, so yeah probably. I don't think they value consistency anyways
Some folks prefer using Feminist Appropriating Reactionary Transphobe instead. A lot of people dismiss it for the acronym, but I think it's as respectful as they deserve. :)
I think at this point we should just start calling them female supremacists. I mean they are starting in with the "Gay men are coming over here and taking our jobs!" rhetoric now.
Dey terk er jerbs!
Dey serkd er derks!
Damnit, you win
bussy
I hate this word. :(
bussy bussy bussy bussy bussy bussy
How about pizzussy?
TERFs are just gender fassicts. Which is why they welcome explicit Nazis at their events and JK loves Matt Walsh.
The most tragic thing about this is that she isn't even using the word breedable correctly. The traditional meaning of the word, which she is trying to gatekeep, means to produce offspring. Humans breed by procreating with another human to create human children. Vaginas do not breed with other vaginas to create vagina children, so vaginas are not breedable.
Even if you think the slang form of the word breedable this guy used is invalid, he's still breedable as long as he's capable of impregnating someone, even if he has no desire to do so.
The difference between technically correct and contextually correct.
You know the argument is getting old when the debate is over semantics rather than the implication of the statement.
Yup^
deleted by creator
Hey now, cunts are fun, resilient, and useful. Unlike Marta.
wow, what a bitch
Where the front at? I'm so ready for the terf war
Doesn't sound like a TERF, just an annoying pedantic linguistic prescriptivist.
its definitely both
Idk how any of you disagree, what do you think "you'll never be a woman" means
ACTUALLY, the womb is the most inhospitable place for an embryo to attach. They could attach far easier anywhere else.
Also I think in this context breedable in the gay community means he likes bareback cream pies.
Which seems to be something they both enjoy. you'd think it would bring everyone together.
Everybody likes getting creamed in, Marta. you're not special
More like Marta should get the fuck out already.
Marta ain't the brightest
This just reminds me of the Ben Shapiro breadsticks analogy
I'm pretty sure were only months away from artificially constructing sperm / ova from any given human gene sample.
Then you just need a willing partner, maybe a surrogate mother and to hold the beer of your fertility technician.