this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
232 points (95.7% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3653 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
232
Georgia judge issues temporary block on gender-affirming healthcare ban: 'An incredible victory' (www.thepinknews.com)
submitted 1 year ago by BagOfHammers@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Elderos@lemmings.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Crazy how those same people in favor of the ban would be cheering for it if it could turn gay children straight. I mean, they were in favor of parents sending their children to gay conversion therapy even though, which are basically torture camps, even though there is no basis for it in medical science.

Maybe that is why they hate the rest of the country so much, they think we're all hypocrite like them, just a different flavour.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

they think we’re all hypocrite like them, just a different flavour.

This is it right here - those who benefit from oppressive systems very often assume that if those they oppress ever gained power, all they would do is turn the tables and oppress them in return. Because A. those with privilege love to find ways to claim victimhood, and B. they can't even conceive of a non-oppressive relationship even existing, they simply don't know what it looks like, so they project their own views (that in society you are either the oppressor or the oppressed and they know which one they would rather be) instead of try to reach a point where no one is oppressed.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yup! Just ask any Republican why it's bad if white people become a minority... They'll just out and tell you these days.

[–] archiotterpup@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is such bs. Lawyers shouldn't be ruling on what is medically necessary. This will just feed into the ignorance and fear that transitioning is dangerous.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

Politicians shouldn't be passing laws prohibiting what is medically necessary. We all know it is hatred targeted at marginalized people and has the effect of harming them, harming their mental health, and leading to more likely suicide. The people who passed these laws should be tarred and feathered. ^figuratively

[–] brainrein@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

You’re stating what the judge just has confirmed, are you aware of that? That is unless you mean that instead it should be politicians to rule over what is medically necessary. Which would sound way too ridiculous to me, even if assuming you're a typical Republican hypocrite.

[–] MTLion3@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

What a victory. I too consider it a W when I stop people from doing something that: Doesn’t hurt anybody, Takes options away from people instead of giving them more, and is another distraction from the real issues we’re currently facing like Climate Change and the mounting issues in China and the Ukraine.