953
submitted 5 months ago by _number8_@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

this country is so fucking cool

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rootiest@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

Sweet making it illegal just makes it even more enticing!

Anyone in OK down for some illegal sexting? 😏

[-] cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz 17 points 5 months ago

The punishment if caught will be a spanking

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

But only for the poor and unconnected, naturally.

[-] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

And for repeat offenders, we can give them life sentences. We'll call it the "three strokes law".

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 5 months ago

i dont understand how things like this can even be pushed to begin with.

It's like banning a word because it makes you think of things that are somewhat unpleasant.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mob@sopuli.xyz 22 points 5 months ago

he bill, set to be introduced next month by state Sen. Dusty Deevers (R-Elgin), would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.

Deevers, a Baptist pastor who was elected last year to represent a rural district that includes the tiny cities of Comanche (population under 1,400) and Elgin (about 3,700),

So some backwater representative is proposing something that will never go anywhere. I bet stupid bills like this are proposed weekly.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 21 points 5 months ago

There’s no way that dude is not railing twinks every weekend.

I’m not saying that’s a bad thing, but his doubtless moral hypocrisy is rustling like a loud chip bag in the movies.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 5 months ago

Of course, politicians will still watch porn and continue to cheat on their partners. Just you silly peasants won't be able to watch porn, because of Jesus or something!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Another proud moment for Christianity

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Scariest part to me is the idea they create death panels.. sorry, felony sentencing panels... sorry, defining what is art and culture panels....

“lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value”

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 5 months ago

They really want a christian theocracy. In 2024. Completely crazy.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 15 points 5 months ago

Yallqaeda everyone.

They cry about Sharia law because they really want Bible law... It's fucking stone age bullshit, it's absolutely insane we're still dealing with this crap.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Go for it, no one wants to live in fucking Oklahoma anyway, what a backwards shithole

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

How would the sexting one be enforced exactly ?

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

The same way all these other proposed tech bans happen: they won't.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

So this is what our politicians work on all day....

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 months ago

I wonder how easily one could "discover" search and sext history for those backing this bill..... and accidently leaving it where their constituents could see how black that pot actually is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz 18 points 5 months ago

Sen. Dusty Deevers

This totally sounds like a pornstar name lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zip2@feddit.uk 17 points 5 months ago

Make America Gilead Again.

[-] Kase@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

Everybody's saying this will never go anywhere, but y'all, as someone from Oklahoma, I wouldn't be surprised at all if this bill made it through. I mean yeah, it'd definitely be struck down in court if it did, but I could easily see it happening. 乁⁠(⁠ ಠ⁠_⁠ಠ⁠ ⁠)⁠ㄏ

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] frank@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

My two take aways from the article

  1. I need to find a way to invest in VPNs somehow
  2. I need to see what comes up when you search for "sex dick"
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hegar@kbin.social 16 points 5 months ago

The bill, set to be introduced next month by state Sen. Dusty Deevers (R-Elgin), would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.

He's not trying to ban porn, it just all has to be like, my hot stepsister teaches me differential equations or slutty milf discusses Chaucer's use of metaphor.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

I don’t know anything about the states really, but this makes Oklahoma sound like a real shithole.

[-] Copernican@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

The bill, set to be introduced next month by state Sen. Dusty Deevers (R-Elgin), would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.

Let's get back to the golden era of porn with some good story telling, step bro.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
953 points (98.1% liked)

News

21721 readers
3235 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS