this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
28 points (88.9% liked)

politics

25505 readers
3104 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic lawmakers in Oregon on Tuesday unveiled a sweeping new bill that would undo a key part of the state’s first-in-the-nation drug decriminalization law, a recognition that public opinion has soured on the measure amid rampant public drug use during the fentanyl crisis.

The bill would recriminalize the possession of small amounts of drugs as a low-level misdemeanor, enabling police to confiscate them and crack down on their use on sidewalks and in parks, its authors said. It also aims to make it easier to prosecute dealers, to access addiction treatment medication, and to obtain and keep housing without facing discrimination for using that medication.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This wouldn't even be a problem if Oregon also had socialized medicine that would offer free drug rehabilitation and treatment programs. That's what you need to do along with decriminalization, otherwise it will never work.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Pretty much this.

They need to look at Portugal and Amsterdam on how to handle decriminalization.

[–] Encode1307@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oregon has expanded Medicaid and only has 6% uninsured. Treatment is free under Medicaid, but there isn't enough treatment available because of historical disinvestment in the treatment system.

Measure 110 invested a lot of money in treatment, but you can't fix decades of apathy in 1 year.

[–] politicalincorruption@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

A Federal program to catch drug abusers when they fall would reduce the need for consequences when they make camp to get their fix. As it stands, drug abusers will go to cities with liberal treatment and make a mess of it.

I visited downtown Portland last year by train and it was a depressing experience. On one side of a public park there was what looked like a potentially dead person wrapped in a blanket with a graffiti backdrop, and on the other side a drugged out guy pissing in the middle of the street. I feel bad for these addicts, but they can live like that…

[–] cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I visited downtown Oregon last year by train and it was a depressing experience.

Downtown Oregon?

Good catch, thanks.

Portland

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Oregonian here... Measure 110 is an absolute shit show.

Yes, it decriminalized drugs and funded treatment programs, but the problem was the treatment programs were 100% optional.

Here's how it "worked":

Get busted with drugs, it's a $100 fine.
Fine can get waived if you call a toll free number to ask about treatment.
Note: All you had to do was call the number. You didn't have to actually GET treatment.

Initially 16,000 or so people were cited in the first year, 0.85% (~136) sought treatment.

https://www.oregonlive.com/health/2022/09/oregons-drug-decriminalization-effort-sends-less-than-1-of-people-to-treatment.html

The rest were looking for free needle exchanges, free methadone, free naloxone.

There are no real consequences, and unlike booze and pot, there are no laws banning public use of hard drugs.

So we get open air drug markets, run by cartels from Honduras, in this case mere blocks from police HQ:

https://www.wweek.com/news/courts/2023/03/25/whos-running-downtown-portlands-open-air-fentanyl-market/

https://www.koin.com/news/crime/feds-drug-traffickers-using-honduran-nationals-to-funnel-fentanyl-into-portland/

https://www.justice.gov/usao-or/pr/honduran-man-arrested-portland-trafficking-rainbow-fentanyl-and-firearms-charged-federal