306
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

An Atlanta prosecutor on Thursday asked a judge to begin the Georgia election interference trial for Donald Trump and 18 other defendants on Oct. 23.

The scheduling request by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis came a day after one of Trump’s co-defendants, attorney Kenneth Chesebro, filed a demand for a speedy trial in the county Superior Court.

Willis directly cited Chesebro’s demand in her filing Thursday.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 95 points 10 months ago

And that is a 100% reasonable start date. There is absolutely no point in delaying, and two months is plenty of time for the attorneys to review the pertinent evidence. Trump's lawyers will definitely try to argue that they need years to review everything, but that is 100% bullshit. The evidence - the text messages, the phone calls, the fraudulent elector certifications, etc. - simply aren't very complicated to go through. They're not.

October 23rd should be a slam-dunk.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 10 months ago

I would go further and say it's Trump's basic right to have a speedy trial. And I'm sure as an innocent defendant Trump will be happy with such a reasonable time frame. (/s just in case it's not obvious that I know that Trump will try to drag this until he can avoid consequences)

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

Exactly. Defendants have the right to a speedy trial, not a long one. There is no legitimate reason to delay it.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I read it as Oct 23rd, 2024, so right during the run up to the election. It is not like he is doing anything else around that time, right?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 59 points 10 months ago

Fuck yes. Finally, one before the primaries.

[-] onionbaggage@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 10 months ago

I kinda want him convicted after the primaries. I want the Republicans stuck with a nominee literally in State prison for the General.

[-] rthmchgs@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 10 months ago

Too bad it won't make a lick of dielfference, and probably will bolster the opinions of the cult members.

[-] reddwarf@feddit.nl 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

probably will bolster the opinions of the cult members

Is there anything to 'un-bolster' or can we say that these people are indeed a cult and cannot be reasoned with and are solidly stuck in their commitment. A cult is perfectly capable of bolstering themselves, they need no help.

People outside that cult should try and stop entertaining the idea that they will potentially get worse by your actions or ideas. Cult ideology should never stop you in pursuing your own ideals and thoughts. They certainly will not be.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Sadly, I think the only thing that could make them stop supporting Trump is if he died. Even then, I'm not sure they'd stop. Some would move on to whatever politician was able to emulate Trump the best. Others would insist that Trump's not really dead, that he'd magically return after having destroyed the Deep State, and that we should elect him as our Forever President until he returns.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.one 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This seemed to be popular information when I posted it (ahem) "elsewhere". Thought it might be welcome to have here.

If you're trying to keep track of where we're at in the Trump prosecutions:

This is for the 1/6 trial in Washington D.C.

If you're trying to keep track of where we're at in the Trump prosecutions:

Updated 8/24/2023

Georgia
13 state felonies
Election Interference
Investigation
Indictment - <- You Are Here
Arrest - Defendants have until noon, Friday, 8/25 to surrender voluntarily.
Trial - Fani Willis has now requested a trial date of October 23rd after originally asking for a trial date of 3/4/2024, one day before Super Tuesday..
A judge has now confirmed an October 23rd trial date for Kenneth Chesebro. But ONLY for Chesebro as he requested an expedited trial.
Conviction
Sentencing

Washington, D.C.
4 federal felonies
January 6th Election Interference
Investigation
Indictment
Arrest <- You Are Here
(DOJ lawyer Jack Smith has requested a trial date of 1/2/2024, Trump lawyers have requested a date of April, 2026. The judge will announce a final date on 8/28/2023)
Trial
Conviction
Sentencing

New York
34 state felonies
Stormy Daniels Payoff
Investigation
Indictment
Arrest <- You Are Here
Trial - March 25th, 2024
Conviction
Sentencing

Florida
40 federal felonies
Top Secret Documents charges
Investigation
Indictment
Original indictment was for 37 felonies.
3 new felonies were added on July 27, 2023.
Arrest <- You Are Here
Trial - May 20, 2024
Conviction
Sentencing

Other grand juries, such as for the documents at Bedminster, have not been announced.

The E. Jean Carroll trial for sexual assault and defamation where Trump was found liable and ordered to pay $5 million before immediately defaming her again resulting in a demand for $10 million is not listed as it's a civil case and not a crimimal one. That trial date is currently set for January 15th, the same day as the Iowa caucus.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 10 months ago

Am I really the only one amused that a cheese bro is named Chesebro?

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 13 points 10 months ago

How about a Sept. 11 trial date for Giuliani?

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Fani ain't foolin.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

In other news, House Chudiciary Committee, led by Gym Jordan launched investivagion into Fani Willis

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Did I miss it in the article where the clarified whether that was Oct. 23rd, 2023, or Oct. 23rd 2024? That seems like a pretty important distinction.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Delaying these trails push us ever closer to a constitutional crisis and "civil war." I say civil war that way because red states are delusional if they think they could ever meaningfully rise up again. It was possible 200 years ago because information traveled slowly. In today's world red states would lose all major cities and military bases instantly.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Things are definitely different. We aren't in some era where war is like twenty guys shooting muskets at each other.

Any state trying to break off would find their guard refusing to go along with it and the leaders of the state arrested. If the governor himself can be personally arrested nothing is going to happen.

[-] Cheems@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It's a Halloween miracle

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
306 points (97.5% liked)

politics

18075 readers
2566 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS