this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
208 points (91.3% liked)

politics

18870 readers
4799 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

After a straw poll showed Representative Lauren Boebert's district switch-up was struggling to win over voters, The Colorado Sun published a cartoon on Friday mocking her reelection efforts.

Boebert, a Republican, announced in December that she would be running for reelection to the U.S. House of Representatives in Colorado's 4th Congressional District instead of the 3rd District where she has held office since 2021.

Despite her defending the move by saying it's the "right decision for those who support our conservative movement," it has been widely viewed as an attempt to avoid lower reelection odds in the 3rd District where she's facing a notable primary challenge from Republican Jeff Hurd and an even more fraught general election challenge from Democrat Adam Frisch.

In addition, Boebert was recorded as the fifth most popular candidate in a straw poll taken after a debate in Fort Lupton, Colorado's eighth congressional district, on January 25. The straw poll taken of 100 Republican voters saw Boebert pick up just 12 votes, behind Logan County Commissioner Jerry Sonnenberg, who topped the poll with 22 votes.

The Colorado Sun, a major online newspaper based in Denver, on Friday published a cartoon by editorial cartoonist Jim Morrissey titled, "How to explain Lauren Boebert's straw poll finish?"

The cartoon takes aim at the congresswoman as it features Boebert holding the straw poll, while saying, "Stop the straw poll steal!"

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dis_honestfamiliar@lemmy.world 41 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

That's a really long article for one panel comic.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 30 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Is this seriously and article about a cartoon that doesn’t sound very critical, with no image of the cartoon or link to it? What awful click bait journalism. How so many upvotes? I assume nobody else is reading it, but just upvoting due to schadenfreusde?

[–] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The link to the cartoon is in the last paragraph.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah, I found the link. Thanks. For anyone looking, last paragraphs before the first giant ad.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

What ad? Failed to configure an adblocker in your browser?

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

I've complained multiple times that the community needs to reject clickbait and opinion pieces, but we still get a bunch of garbage from Newsweek, salon, etc.

Downvote and move on

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Just hit us with the link for your OnlyFans already, Lauren

[–] Steve@startrek.website 12 points 7 months ago
[–] AnonWyo@startrek.website 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I swear, the country would be healed if Hunter Biden would sleep with Boebert.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But poor Hunter would get gonorrhea

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

And have his dick bitten off by what I assume is a small sarlacc pit. No fucking thank you.

[–] don@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Do you think she’ll make a video in a broadway theater?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

We can only withstand so much pain...

[–] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 25 points 7 months ago

If MAGA hadn’t come along she’d be pulling shifts and johns at a truck stop.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Damn girl, do you shit with that ass?

No really this is the one who pooped herself right?

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Evidently even MAGA has a limit on electing stupid.........It kind if shocks me to learn that.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There only appears to be a limit on electing stupid women. Stupid men can and will continue to be elected.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

I think they might be reaching that limit also. But it's hard to tell honestly.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


After a straw poll showed Representative Lauren Boebert's district switch-up was struggling to win over voters, The Colorado Sun published a cartoon on Friday mocking her reelection efforts.

Despite her defending the move by saying it's the "right decision for those who support our conservative movement," it has been widely viewed as an attempt to avoid lower reelection odds in the 3rd District where she's facing a notable primary challenge from Republican Jeff Hurd and an even more fraught general election challenge from Democrat Adam Frisch.

In addition, Boebert was recorded as the fifth most popular candidate in a straw poll taken after a debate in Fort Lupton, Colorado's eighth congressional district, on January 25.

The Colorado Sun, a major online newspaper based in Denver, on Friday published a cartoon by editorial cartoonist Jim Morrissey titled, "How to explain Lauren Boebert's straw poll finish?"

The congresswoman has also supported the "Stop the Steal" movement in 2020, a conservative campaign and protest that the 2020 election was stolen via widespread fraud, a claim Trump has often said without any evidence.

Former New York assistant attorney generaland Donald Trump critic Tristan Snell said on X, formerly Twitter, on Tuesday that the congresswoman was facing problems because she "abandoned her congressional district because she was going to lose."


The original article contains 541 words, the summary contains 215 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!