this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
394 points (93.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2258 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 254 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Carlson is essentially admitting to being a Russian asset.

[–] cryostars@lemmyf.uk 86 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah he wraps it up in a neat little package to make it seem like he's just trying to be a benevolent journalist, but anyone with two or three functioning brain cells can read between the lines here. It's really creepy and disturbing especially when you realize tens of millions of Americans like and believe this guy. SMH

[–] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 58 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, I'm not sure how else he'd have the connections to set up that interview, or why they'd reach out to him.

It amazes me that Fox news viewers can't connect the dots on even the simplest of lies.

[–] numbermess@kbin.social 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you connect the dots you're more likely to see the shape, and they don't want to see it (or admit out loud yet that they see it)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

That would require thinking about things they're not specifically told about, and fox "news" programming inherently selects against people with that ability. Anyone who has that ability will stop watching Fox because they'll quickly see through the lies and stop watching.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

And so is every politician that supports him doing this

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 127 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The Twitter discourse is all conservatives saying "Dems HATE this but it's JOURNALISM! The LIBERAL MEDIA refuses to interview him and theyre calling it TREASON but HE'S RIGHT! They're hypocrites because they didn't call it treason when X LEFTIST journalist interviewed him years ago!

And at first I got a little swept up in it, I was thinking "yeah actually it is good to interview world leaders even if they are involved in wars, I agree with the Right on this.'

But then I just went to check on what actual left leaning people and journalists were actually tweeting. Left leaning people were saying it was going to be bad because Tucker isn't a journalist and he was going to make a puff piece for a dictator full of misinformation. So it wasn't that interviews with Putin are bad, it's that this interview will be bad.

Journalists are saying they've all had interview requests in for years, they want to interview him he just refuses Western media and the question is how Tucker got the interview. If he promised softball questions or gave editorial control to Putins team or something things could get real not-journalism-y fast.

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 77 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

a puff piece for a dictator full of misinformation

It's not a puff piece. It's full-on Russian propaganda tailor-made for American conservatives. The entire point is to draw even more conservative voters into the fold and convince them that the US needs to stop supporting Ukraine and move towards pulling out of NATO.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 29 points 9 months ago

This is a symptom of a larger problem, which is that the bar for journalism for conservatives is literally just the big red R next to their names. Anyone who labels themselves republican can suddenly tell no lies and do no harm. That's exactly what right wing media wants, but it has destroyed the very integrity journalism has been built on for 100+ years, and the kicker is that conservatives in this country don't even have a clue about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 121 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (74 children)

I can picture the whole interview already.

Tucker: "Mr. Putin, why did you invade Ukraine?"

Putin: "We had many very legitimate reasons. Ukrainian nazis, US imperialism, NATO expansion."

Tucker: "What will it take for you to stop this war? Will you guarantee peace?"

Putin: "We are a very rational and forgiving people. We ask for nothing but the unconditional surrender of Ukraine. We will treat everyone with respect and we won't meddle with any other country outside Ukraine. KGB spy pinky-promise."

Tucker: "Mr. Putin, may I suck your cock?"

Putin: "You may."

*30 minutes of slurping noises*

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I need a remindme bot to remind me if this will all come true.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (73 replies)
[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 109 points 9 months ago (4 children)

So Tucker Carlson, the man who reportedly fucked a donkey once, will suck Putins cock on a livestream. His dreams must come true.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 50 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Don't forget, you can only see it on his pay site lol biggest grifter

[–] finthechat@kbin.social 47 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Tucker Carlson Onlyfans

2 hour long blowjob video

Russian audio, English subs

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

What a terrible day to be able to read.

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

I was having a fine day, fuck you for putting that image into my head. I hope you step on a lego.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 97 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can we just… leave him there?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago

GOP's sugar daddy doesn't like his party's results he paid for and wants to speak to their voter base directly; cut out the middle persons. Got to love how stupid people watch this propaganda for hire clown or the media mercenaries he spawned from.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 40 points 9 months ago (3 children)
[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 15 points 9 months ago

Stewart's line about how can another administration be more absurd than the Bush administration dated surprisingly badly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I can't wait to find out what really stupid asskissing questions he asks Putin with that fake confused look on his face.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are we sure he's not permanently semi confused? Like, wouldn't surprise me to learn that he doesn't quite have a grasp on things.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago

Tucker Carlson set to interview his boss

FTFY

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Cucker Tarlson is pulling a Tulsi Gabbard. What a fucking surprise.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

He's always been a Russian asset. Kremlin memos leaked instructed RT to air as many Carlson clips as possible.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Ahh yes, the propagandist too controversial even for Fox News. Tens of millions of Americans will watch this heavily curated interview and think that Putin is a pretty good guy.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He was only too controversial for them when he cost them a shitload of money.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Can we jsut let him stay over there? He seems happy to suck putin wiener

[–] PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if Carlson is fully aware of how deep the hole is that he is about to crawl into. He likely already is a full russian stooge, but if not, he's about to find out just how tyrannical despots can be when you're in their power. Imagine the open and implied threats to his life and his family as they walk him through exactly what to say. Imagine how they dissuade him when he suggests certain questions that he wants to ask. If he strays from the exact script? Somebody get a picture of him when he returns to the states, and if it's within a week of the interview, see how many bruises, cuts, limps, or other signs of 'treatment' there are.

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I just don't understand why.

He already has enough money to never work again. What is wrong with these people?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

May he stand near many open windows, rooftop edges, and elevator shafts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 17 points 9 months ago

So… he’s basically getting an employee evaluation.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Reminds me of The Interview: Just sit near a window or shake hands with a fake gum.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 14 points 9 months ago

Tucker ‘Bussy’ Carlson.

load more comments
view more: next ›