28
submitted 4 months ago by Oneeightnine@feddit.uk to c/askuk@feddit.uk

I'll go first....The Office.

Now I know the two shows are fundamentally quite different, but they adapted what was already a very successful show, and turned It into an event more successfully one that lasted for significantly longer than the original did. I say that's a win for them.

Anything else? Life on Mars, Being Human, The Inbetweeners.....?

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

I genuinely can't think of one that finished better. A big part of the art of entertainment is knowing when to stop.

If you look up reviews for any British shows on IMDb, a good chunk of the reviews all say the same thing - "Oh my gaaad the Briddish make the best shows, I just wish they had more episodes!"

Totally missing the point that it was good because it told its story and finished

They can't even bring themselves to say "miniseries", it has to be a "limited series"

[-] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

100%. Fleabag comes to mind. Wish there were more episodes, but it ended right when it should have.

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 20 points 4 months ago

There's quite a good Wikipedia article on this.

Amongst all the quiz and reality shows, there are a few intriguing obscure nuggets:

  • The Golden Girls is an adaptation of a UK TV series, The Brighton Belles.
  • They've tried to adapt Fawlty Towers three times.
  • Not the Nine O' Clock News was adapted for the US.
  • One Foot in the Grave became Cosby - presumably the British version didn't have enough (ie any) rapists.
  • They tried to adapt Spaced, IT Crowd and the Young Ones but they failed at the pilot stage. This is probably A Good Thing. Although I might see if I can dig out the pilots.
[-] its_me_gb@feddit.uk 14 points 4 months ago

They also did a pilot of Red Dwarf!

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 4 points 4 months ago
[-] Apeman42@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I'm sure it would have been terrible, but part of me wants to see how Terry Farrell would have done as Cat.

[-] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago

They tried that one twice!

[-] DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

presumably the British version didn’t have enough (ie any) rapists.

You forgot Little Jimmy. shoe-in for such a role...

[-] Marcumas@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

The US pilot of the IT Crowd is on YouTube, and it's pretty terrible. Even Joel McHale couldn't save it.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

The Fawlty remake with Bea Arthur was an interesting try. Casting her in the Cleese role was a good idea, but the script writing was poor.

[-] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I'm reading that Brighton Belles was based off of Golden Girls, not the other way around.

[-] IggyTheSmidge@kbin.social 3 points 4 months ago

Cosby predates One Foot in the Grave - I remember watching Cosby as a kid in the 80s, and OFitG didn't show up until the 90s. OFitG became (I think) Curb Your Enthusiam.

[-] GombeenSysadmin@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

The Cosby Show was the 80s. Cosby was 96-2000.

[-] IggyTheSmidge@kbin.social 2 points 4 months ago

Huh - I assumed they were the same thing.
I wonder if it never aired in the UK...

[-] byroon@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Peep Show also notable I think for how many failed attempts there have been to adapt i

[-] cdf12345@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

British television audience are very accepting of the American originals while being much less accepting of British remakes (see, for instance, the failure of The Brighton Belles, the British remake of The Golden Girls).

[-] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 1 points 4 months ago

I would argue that not the nine o'clock news was better than anything stateside

[-] buried_treasure@feddit.uk 10 points 4 months ago

Maybe a controversial one but I much prefer the US version of Shameless to the British one.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Same, but it went on too long. I stopped at season 7 and recently tried to finish it, but I just don’t care any more. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[-] byroon@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

I don't think you can say either the US or UK office is better than the other, they're too different

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago

You also can't say it was more successful because it lasted longer, the yanks will milk every comedy dry until it's ejaculating pure dust

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 5 points 4 months ago

That's my feeling, they're very different beasts. The British one is like a bespoke gem and the American one is that retooled for the US comedy writing system.

[-] frazorth@feddit.uk 5 points 4 months ago

What feels like a controversial opinion, but it really shouldn't be, I don't think the US Office is as good as the UK Office.

The UK Office felt like a documentary, and really felt like places I had worked and knew people like that.

Once the US Office got out of copying the UK one, it just become a sitcom that had people talking to the audience. I mean it was good, but it was still basically an American sitcom.

It's like WWDITS. The film was awesome, and the first season that still involved the Kiwis was good, but it quickly subsided into standard American dross. Winning a Golden Globe for basically not being WWDITS and just being Matt Berry was the icing.

[-] towerful@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago

WWDITS = What We Do In The Shadows.
The film was awesome

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 10 points 4 months ago

Robot wars (called battlebots in the US)

[-] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Robot Wars is actually an American show and Battlebots is an off-shoot.

[-] PCurd@feddit.uk 3 points 4 months ago

Robot Wars was created in America but the first televised show was in the UK.

[-] peter@feddit.uk 1 points 4 months ago

I don't think battle bots is better, it's definitely more successful though

[-] Davel23@kbin.social 7 points 4 months ago

In the '70s there were several US adaptations of UK shows which were quite successful. All In The Family was based on Til Death Us Do Part, Sanford and Son was based on Steptoe and Son, and Three's Company was based on Man About The House. In these cases both versions were very successful in their own ways.

[-] RedEyes@kbin.social 7 points 4 months ago

I am enjoying the US version of Ghosts. Sufficiently different while manifestly the same. And fills the void since the UK version finished.

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Whose Line Is It Anyway. Wayne Brady absolutely kills it.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 4 points 4 months ago

Whose Line Is It Anyway?

[-] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Life on Mars. Although I really enjoyed the British original as well.

But no one can come close to the Great British Baking Show.

[-] PatMustard@feddit.uk 10 points 4 months ago

Great British Baking Show

That's Bake-Off over here, sonnyjim!

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

IIRC, the brand Betty Crocker owns "bake off" as a trademark over in the USA, so we couldn't call it that.

Great show, unless you do like a soggy bottom.

[-] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 4 points 4 months ago

There's a Captain Disillusion video which shows you the effort they go to when making the US edition. Items include filming intro scenes twice (and you can see sketches aren't as funny the second time around) and even using digital effects to change the name on the winners trophy.

[-] argh_another_username@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

But no one can come close to the Great British Baking Show.

I prefer the Canadian. In terms of “feel good” show, the Canadian goes further.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The American version didn't have DCI Gene Hunt, which automatically makes it inferior

[-] ctobrien84@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I think this is due to the actual societal character of the British compared to us Americans. We just can't seem to genuinely pull it off because it's somewhat counterintuitive to the way we're raised socially. Try as we might, we may come close, but we seem to always miss the mark, even if the differences are hard to put a finger on. That's just my opinion.

[-] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I think some of the difference has to do with the show’s format. You don’t see anyone arguing or backstabbing. On the contrary, even though they are competing against each other they often help each other out. In the USA we have shows like Jersey Shore, car repo, bounty hunter, everything we watch is some form of confrontation pitting someone against someone else and then filming and broadcasting the fireworks. Can you tell that I’m tired of American TV?

[-] ballskicker@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

LegoMasters started in the UK, right? I'll take that or the Aussie one over the crap they tried making in the US. I'd rather watch the incredible things people can do with Lego instead of pretend to enjoy the showrunners' poor attempts at a weekly emotional tug job

[-] Repelle@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Australian Lego masters is easily the best English language version. I haven’t seen any of the versions in other languages, though.

[-] peter@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago

Netflix's House Of Cards was based on a British series which is based on a novel

[-] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Top Gear, obv. No, sorry, reallly, it was woeful.

[-] TheaoneAndOnly27@kbin.social 1 points 4 months ago

IT crowd. Joel Mchale makes everything better /s ;)

this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
28 points (86.8% liked)

Ask UK

1099 readers
1 users here now

Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the UK.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS