this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
28 points (93.8% liked)

movies

1593 readers
343 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I never realised the film was this bad. This review is brutal and more importantly, enjoyable.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Sony should just return the rights to Spider-Man live action and focus on the animated movies.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It wouldn't matter. Disney would fuck them up. All of them.

Let Sony have one stinker.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Disney has been hit and miss. Sony has been all misses. GotG3 was good, and many of the shows, Loki, Echo, What If, Moon Knight, they have been good. I enjoyed She-Hulk, but I understand why many people didn't.

The point is, Morbius could be morbin around in the background of the upcoming Blade movie. Symbiotes could have been connected to the Necrosword. Kingpin, Daredevil, and Punisher are all coming back to the MCU and it would be excellent if they had Kraven, Rhino, Vulture, Shocker, Prowler, Doctor Octopus, Chameleon, et. al. to interact with.

[–] Khrux@ttrpg.network 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah 6 years ago I may have thought that letting Disney get all fragments of marvel IPs under their belt was for the best but I'm pretty sure Disney would just pump out similar bland garbage now.

I'm a big believer that bland is worse than bad, although it's worth saying the Sony movies have been bland, they've been less bland and more bad than the MCU.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago

I've been saying this for years. We can't trust Disney with ips we actually like. Especially stuff that would work better being with higher number ratings. Like pg16 or higher.

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The last three live action Spider-Man movies were fantastic, though. It's everything else that they should return for sure.

[–] Strasza@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You mean the 3 live action Spider-man movies made by marvel?

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Are you being sarcastic? Marvel didn't make the Tom Holland Spider-Man films, they just negotiated them to be part of the MCU. Sony still made them, having final creative control over the films:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider-Man:_Homecoming

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It was definitely a collaboration, each of these movies had MCU characters fairly prominent if not headlining.

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Read the production section of the wiki. It talks about the agreements and how that came about.

[–] Blaze@reddthat.com 1 points 7 months ago

TIL, interesting

[–] NIB@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Is this the female Morbius? Its spiritual successor? Damn, sony did it again. Now we just need to meme about it and make Sony re-release it, so that it can flop twice, just like its predecessor. Too bad noone even cares enough to meme about it.

[–] Blaze@reddthat.com 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Morbius was released twice?

[–] NIB@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Yes

https://www.ign.com/articles/morbius-theatrical-re-release-box-office-memes-unsuccessful

Forbes reports that the movie made $300,000 across the 1,037 theaters it was screened in, translating to just $289 per theater.

It was hilarious. It was one of the greatest corporate out of touch moves ever.

[–] Blaze@reddthat.com 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Every critic I see seems to agree this movie is bad. It's almost worrying how complete the consensus is.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. Nowadays I'm sceptical of professional critic reviews, because sometimes I'll really enjoy a movie that some critics hate. But I'm surprised there is such a consensus, that probably means something.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I dunno. These guys seemed pretty psyched.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It might help if they used the Spider-Man characters people have actually heard of

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not a marvel Fanboy. Or a Spider-Man super fan by any means. But even I've heard of Madame Webb. Not whoever this movie is about but the actual madam Webb. Morbius. On the other hand, yeah that one I wasn't necessarily aware of. But Madame Webb I think more people are aware of than you might guess.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

The only reason I know Madame Webb is that she randomly started telling Spider-Man what to do in the later episodes of his 90's show, where she felt completely out of place and poorly explained.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I actually prefer the opposite. I don't want them to butcher Doc Ock, or do a Norman Osborn standalone. And the marvel movies show you can absolutely uplift a obscure character and suddenly make them popular.

Sony just are sucking at execution, over and over.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Honestly I liked Morbius, I thought it was refreshing that we just had a cool dark super hero movie without years of MCU baggage, stupid injokes, or meta humor.