this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
195 points (95.8% liked)

News

22890 readers
3745 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The method, known as EM Eye, can even capture images through walls, raising huge concerns about the potential for misuse.

The research, led by Kevin Fu, a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Northeastern University, targets a vulnerability in the data transmission cables within most modern cameras. These cables unintentionally act as radio antennas, leaking electromagnetic information that can be picked up and decoded to reveal real-time video.

As reported by Tech Xplore, the vulnerability exists because manufacturers focus on protecting the intentional digital interfaces of cameras, such as the upload channel to the cloud, but overlook the potential for information leakage through accidental channels. "They never intended for this wire to become a radio transmitter, but it is," Fu explains. "If you have your lens open, even if you think you have the camera off, we're collecting."

Cross post from https://lemmy.world/post/12081766

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 57 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The next paragraph is also worth highlighting (emphasis added).

The EM Eye method has been tested on 12 different types of cameras, including those found in smartphones, dash cams, and home security systems. The distance required to eavesdrop varies, but in some cases, it can be done from as far as 16 feet away.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, and how big are the recording antennae?

Guy sitting 2 tables over:

[–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

I posted this in another thread originally:

Actual Paper, images on page 10 On the top of Page 10 are example shots, ground truth is original image, sota means the captured feed, EM Eye is the feed with their post-processing (aka “Enhance”). The lengths on top are how long the cable you are snooping on is (ie a cell phone’s cable is only gonna be a few cm, a laptop is probably at the 15cm mark), and how far away you are (Those last pics at 300cm(3m) would be under 10ft). It is definitely impressive but this is up there with stealing passwords from keyboard clicks, you usually have somewhat of an advanced threat in mind to think someone might use this against you.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 7 months ago (3 children)

manufacturers focus on protecting the intentional digital interfaces of cameras, such as the upload channel to the cloud

I think even that is giving them too much credit. Like most "internet of things" devices, cameras that upload to the cloud are generally awful at security and privacy.

[–] WFStarbuck@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The S in IoT is for Security.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca -4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

This isn't cloud/online vulnerability. It's physical due to a wire in cameras (smartphone, home security, dashcam, etc) that send out radio signals.

It's all in the article.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Parent commenter said that IOT devices are vulnerable in areas that manufacturers do focus on, in addition to areas they don't. They didn't deny or misunderstand the subject of the article.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 20 points 7 months ago (10 children)

Thank god people watching me is my fetish

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] SaintWacko@midwest.social 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wow, we've actually reached the point of Van Eck Phreaking. Time to switch to Memexes!

[–] alphafalcon@feddit.de 1 points 7 months ago

Is that a reference to Angleton?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Well... I guess if this is our brave new world, I hope the people spying on me find my life as boring as I do.

[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

Cool, I've been looking for some relatable TV!

[–] gondezee@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Which fast and furious plot line was this again?

[–] Norgur@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

I need the frequency for that. And a transmitter that can play Rock Astley.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Are there people who don’t put tape over their cameras??

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I actually use the cameras on pretty much all my devices, so disabling them would be a problem.

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago

You don't need to disable them, just get or make removable covers. When you want to film, slip off the camera cover.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

No, unless you're actually somebody important, it's incredibly unlikely something like this is going to be used against you. So those covers are just more annoying than anything.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It takes no effort to do so and a lot of laptops even come with camera cover switches built in.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It does take a little effort at a minimum, however, when compared to the relative real world risk it's purely wasted. Unless of course, you're a politician or maybe important executive for a major company.

Keep your shit updated, ad blocking and no installing shady shit will lockout the lowest common denominator "hackers" (AKA script kiddies). All those scary articles about super advanced techniques? Yea, hackers with real skills can implement them and do some wicked shit, but they DGAF about Joe Schmo's jack off session, they're doing shit like targeting companies, politicians, celebrities etc things that can get them $$$$

It's pointless, it's security theater that you've imposed on yourself and yet I'm sure you've complained about the pointless and annoying TSA as security theater...

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

Oh so you're pulling the "I have nothing to hide because I'm just a normal boring person" argument. Guess you need a physical person stalking you for you to understand.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

You're having the same mistake as the people who say "it doesn't matter because I got nothing to hide."

The point of privacy is that you have control over what you want to share with others vs what you prefer to keep to yourself, be it for legal, religious or personal reasons.

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago

It's pretty disgusting how many people in this tread are actively promoting weak digital security practices with laziness as the justification and how little you actually understand about data theft.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Nice try, NSA!

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The article includes dashcams and home security cameras, I definitely cover those with tape.

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Almost no one even understands how to take digital security seriously, and get angry when you try to help them.

I mean just look at your up/dowvote ratio.

Full disclosure: Am an IT professional with 3 decades of experience. Every camera device I have has a cover, either that came with the device, or one that I made.

Remember that huge fiasco with the schools that were spying on kids bedrooms at night?

Yeah, that tells you all you need to know about how trustworthy any camera is.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Putting tape over the microphone doesn't work very well.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

well, if you want to see my ugly ass on the shitter or digging my nose without consent that much, joke's on you, i guess

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

is it tho. if your phones cams are not coincidentally covered by tables or the fabric of your pocket, where are they pointing, genius?

for most regular people, like me, covering them is pointless. the security measures in place are not perfect, but sufficient. someone who goes over the top to circumvent them will find he just gets to see a regular person doing regular things.

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There is a significant possibility that within the next 10 years any western nation can go full authoritarian.

You will laugh naively and say that it won't happen. And it is because of sentiments like this that we have a twice impeached fascist who idolizes shitler on the ballot for president later this year.

So can you imagine your country, with an authoritarian government in power with the ability to spy on literally every citizen?

Can you imagine that authoritarian government 'disappearing' dissidents based on their social media participation?

If you can answer yes to this, then you understand why it is CRITICAL to control every aspect of your identity exposure?

My phones front and back cams are covered with a clip until I want to use them. And that's not even the beginning of what I do to limit my online profile.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

you're talking about the problems of a possible future, but taking non-preventative measures against it right now that are useless (for me and other regular people) right now.

if the dark future you're describing becomes reality, i will gladly put a sticker on my phones cam, so the spy in the hallway can't see your chin when you sit near my coffee table