this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
299 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2588 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

From top to bottom, the national GOP organization could soon be rid of anyone seen as insufficiently MAGA.

First came the internal grumbling about Ronna McDaniel, the chairwoman of the Republican National Committee.

Then came McDaniel’s decision to step down from her post at the end of February as she lost the support of Donald Trump.

After that came Trump’s move to put forward a slate of loyalists to take over the party’s top spots—including an election-denying state party chair, a Trump campaign senior adviser, and the former president’s own daughter-in-law.

Next could come the purge.

“I think within 30 days you’ll see a purge of staffers from the RNC, because it’s a hotbed for anti-Trumpism,” Steve Bannon, Trump’s former chief strategist and host of the War Room podcast told The Daily Beast. “That’s the open secret.”

Skeptical holdouts within the RNC have gotten the message: Their days are numbered.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 150 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Americans take note: they're starting the purge with their allies. What do you think Trump and his minions will do if they retake power over the entire country?

[–] hglman@lemmy.world 70 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Trump has had 4 years to put together a revenge plan. Everyone loves to call him stupid, but he and his team can plan things for stupid purposes. He will purge the federal government he cannot directly profit from. That will have profound downstream effects and harm.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 40 points 9 months ago (1 children)

thing is, it's not so much that they're stupid as they're inept.

Trump et al are cunning, like an animal. they have an instinct to strike out and get what they want. what they are not, however, is clever. many people mistake cunning and clever for being the same thing, but they're not. cleverness requires the ability to plan ahead and to be able to competently execute said plan effectively, and, often, Trump and his allies cannot do this, or, at least, often fail to do so effectively.

because they're incompetent, inept, and, often, because they're idiots.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Since it takes skill to build something, but even an idiot can burn it down through incompetence, they are a threat whether the people wanting to tear down the system are competent or not.

Hell, they might be more dangerous because they are idiots who appeal to idiots.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 months ago

I love that invariably conversations about Trump all end up acknowledging he is awful, then disagreeing in exactly what kind of awful he is.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

More to the point, a whole bunch of evil people a lot smarter than Trump have had 4 years to put together a plan. That one's not just for revenge, though; that's for turning the US into a full-blown dictatorship.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 47 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Brink?

Where's John McCain, John Bohner, Paul Ryan, Kevin McCarthy?

The purge happened a decade ago in the House. That's what the fucking problem is. Do you seriously think the Party of George W. Bush / John McCain would be helping Russia right now?

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well John McCain is... Not around for obvious reasons. But you can also add John Kasich, Liz Cheney, and Mike Pence to the list.

[–] spamfajitas@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You could probably replace John McCain with Mitt Romney? He has somewhat recently voiced dissatisfaction IIRC.

Actually, hell, Darth Cheney himself is still somehow alive. He can't be happy with the way his dream of American exceptionalism has turned out with respect to the current state of the Republican party.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It is a purge, just without all the messy killing. But there's a reason why Stalin finished the job the way he did, and why Putin operates the way he has. There is an entire generation of political experts who are getting thrown out of the party they have supported their entire lives. Where will they go?

Also note that candidates that Trump personally endorses tend not to do that well. Some do win, of course, but not as many. Mitch has been bemoaning "candidate quality" as the reason why he doesn't have a majority in the Senate.

One of my favorite conspiracy theories of the moment is that if Trump wins, he would prefer to take office with a fully Democratic Congress, because it makes for better TV. And when he does absolutely nothing, he can blame the Democrats for it. Trump only needs 34 Senators on his side to vote against impeachment, and he can do whatever the fuck he wants without consequences.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Purges don't need to be associated with violence, per se. That's just how Stalin and Hitler liked them. You can also simply throw them out of their positions though, so they can no longer stand against you.

Still a purge. Corporations sometimes do purges.

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

Sometimes

Looks at the 300,000 people laid off in tech this year alone...

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago

This is the dress rehearsal. Remember that your broken brained relatives, if they are reachable, are probably only reachable by YOU. It might be uncomfortable, but if Aunt Pat or Uncle Frank live in a swing state, you should think about trying to talk to them about how they'll irreparably break the future for you and your kids if they don't wake the fuck up.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 17 points 9 months ago

And just like that, #Russia destroyed their greatest historical enemy, the #GOP.

[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

To all those in the GOP that cinicly thought they could ride the Wave of Fascism and come out unscathed:

You failed. Inevitably.

Enjoy being dragged to the Gallows you eagerly helped raising.

You will only be missed, because MAGA is slightly worse then you.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

Turns out the party of lying about virtually everything in order to funnel money to the rich couldn't figure out how to separate itself from the lies of populism when the liar in chief came along. They had no mechanism to say wait, not those lies, only these lies.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Most of y'all never heard the word "purge" before those movies huh?

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 12 points 9 months ago

“Surely if I help with this purge, I’ll get to stay cozy and secure in my position after, because there won’t be any more in the future”

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 8 points 9 months ago

I'm pretty sure this is how Sadam Hussein rose to power, too.

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 6 points 9 months ago
[–] nexusband@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Okay - dumb European, that doesn't really understand the finer details of the defacto two party system in the U.S.: Why don't those former members of the RNC "just" from a new party?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Answer from Canadian: They can but the Republican name is what lots of people will just vote for. That's why the Trumpers want it too instead of making their own party.

*They also know if they split the right wing vote between two parties, the Democrats will win.

[–] dwalin@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For a time, yes. But with 3+ you start having to form aliances, negotiate, compromise, and you know... Do politics.

In theory at least

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I doubt the party that just split will cooperate together.

But really with FPTP they will lose big.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago

LET THE BODIES HIT THE

FLOOOOOOR