this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
259 points (95.1% liked)

Political Memes

5452 readers
3041 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 31 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

It's a popularity contest among 150 academics. A group that has swung hard against Republicans recently.

But really regardless the current president shouldn't be on these. And not that it has come up before but current candidates probably shouldn't be on there either.

I think in 30 years we will see Biden's first term as much more politically successful than Trump's, and probably Trump's as more influential as a break from Reagan/Bush conservatism. Historians will weigh these two things against each other and I bet we see Biden well above Trump but we don't have enough information, it's too soon.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

I'm no scholar and Trump should be somewhere in the bottom-10th percentile for sure, but that Andrew Jackson isn't dead last discredits the entire thing, honestly.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Andrew Jackson was an evil bastard, but he was also very effective.

He successfully paid off the national debt, was highly-successful navigating foreign affairs (including avoiding a war with France), brought Arkansas and Michigan into the union, and was partially responsible for Texas joining through covert arming of Texan revolutionaries. His last act as President was to formally recognize the Republic of Texas, which was the first step towards its annexation.

The Indian Removal Act earned him a special place in Hell and tainted his legacy forever. But he had some successes. Trump's only real achievement was being President after the Republicans had refused to appoint any federal judges, so even his single political success came down to Mitch McConnell being effective in the Obama years and RBG dying at the right time.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Him paying off the national debt caused the longest and deepest (by percentage not dollar value, great depression wins there) depression in US history.

We were founded as a country of traders, and by paying off the national debt, we removed the dollars that other countries had to buy stuff from us. This crippled our economy for well over a decade. I wouldn't call that effective, unless you think he was actually trying to sabotage the country, which I wouldn't put past him.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's the thing. He was evil, but effective. What did Trump even accomplish aside from stacking the Court, which really had nothing to do with him?

If a politician does something harmful that I hate, that's not necessarily the save thing as being a bad or ineffective President. Plenty of bad people are effective leaders, and plenty of good ones are not.

Jimmy Carter was probably the best person to ever be President, and his stances on environmental issues were decades ahead of their time. I love Jimmy Carter.

But he wasn't a good President because he couldn't get anything done. Andrew Jackson did.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

That's why I say Trump should forever be stuck at the 45th percentile of presidents. He was mediocre at best, and a useful tool at worst.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah those are fair points but I just personally kind of think the whole genocide thing immediately sends him to the bottom, independent of his efficiency elsewhere. Scholars seem to be over-thinking it if not whitewashing here.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

If Trump were to have had a chance at a genocide, he'd have jumped at the opportunity. I firmly believe that he'd have directly started carpet-bombing Gaza if he were in office a few months back.

What about Buchanan?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

He was pretty mediocre as a president really. Put him in the 45th percentile, and keep him there.

Also Wilson is arguably worse than Jackson, but not by much

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago

to be truly fair it should be only ranking any president who has died more than 26 years before the poll date. That allows for all their classified documents to be declassified and their legacy to be truly dissected.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Old smart guy or demented criminal - it's a tough choice, eh?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

Old demented criminal.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Lower approval rating than every president going back to Eisenhower at this point in their presidency.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/biden-approval-rating/

But hey 154 “current and recent members of the Presidents & Executive Politics Section of the American Political Science Association” ranked him 14th!

http://www.brandonrottinghaus.com/uploads/1/0/8/7/108798321/presidential_greatness_white_paper_2024.pdf

Maybe go look at what the data you’re actually memeing is next time?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

You can be great at what you do without being popular, especially when how popular you are is based on the opinion of an extremely divided population that's influenced by media that try to make people angry at anything and everything to generate more clicks so they sell more ads.

That's why we listen to the opinions of experts, not random Joes. Just go to a townhall meeting to listen to the average person and their take on what cities should do.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

In a democracy the opinion of the people matters.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When making a list based on the accomplishments and not popularity, the opinion of the majority isn't what matters.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

When people in a democracy decide they want a dictatorship their opinions won't matter a bit.