32
submitted 1 year ago by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

feel free to list other window managers you've used.

I have been happy with bspwm, but considering trying something else. I love its simplicity and immense customizability. I like that it is shell scriptable, but it is not a deal breaker feature for me.

I like how the binary split model makes any custom partition possible.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JetpackJackson@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

i3 and sway

[-] ME3D@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago
[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Sorry to be the boring i3 user but it's a rock solid TWM. Plus I am using the autotiling mod and now it's even better :D

[-] kunday@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

XMonad. Been using it for almost a decade, and very powerful. I3 I hear is also good.

[-] vividspecter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I prefer the way XMonad handles multimonitor workspaces, but left for Sway due to wayland support.

[-] kunday@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

need to give it a try. I'm stuck in the past times lol

[-] whoopingsneeze@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago

I haven't used XMonad in a long time, but it was my go-to for a few years. It was solid. The main issue is that you configure it in Haskell, and I don't know Haskell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lckdscl@whiskers.bim.boats 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i3 until the day I die

Edit: Why? Because I love how easy it is to get working, it's a nice balance between features and simplicity for me, and IPC features are great for some QoL plugins. Its configuration file format is simple enough, I like lua with wezterm and neovim but I don't really see the point with a WM, I just need to see my windows when I want, the way I want, and to switch to others.

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Can you list some QoL mods for i3? I have been using autotiling for the last few months and it's great.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

i3 gang rise up!

I've only tried i3 and it just works, so I stuck with it. After learning the hotkeys it never seems to get in the way (at least for my usage). Riced it a bit. Then some polybar sparkled in there. A wallpaper. What more can a guy want?

[-] ScottE@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

i3 is what I've been using the past few years. I've tried others, but I always end back up with i3 as I've found nothing else to be as simple and efficient for my workflow, with 12 workspaces across 2 monitors.

[-] NateSwift@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I’ve been using i3. Nothing super advanced but the config is easy and being able to reload in place is nice

[-] Fubarberry@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I usually use tiling add-ons for Gnome or KDE. So pop-shell or bismuth.

[-] communist@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Sway, but single window capture and the animations make hyprland very tempting...

[-] ForynGilnith@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

My heart still belongs to enlightenment/e17 but I've been using i3 for the past few years, and then hyprland for the last 4 months or so. It's working out well.

[-] i_am_hiding@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Man e16 was the shit. If it played nice with hot-plugging monitors, I'd still use it today. It had some awesome themes, too.

What's e17 like? I've truthfully never used it, though I daily Terminology as a terminal emulator.

[-] ForynGilnith@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ahhh, e17 - I've got memories of building it from either cvs or svn at the time as soon as it was announced by rasterman on Slashdot.

e17 was my daily driver for a long time. It looked very pretty, before compositing was even a thing on the desktop, all without sacrificing performance. The biggest downside was that it wrote its configs as binary blobs which frequently broke as new development releases came out.

[-] xchgeaxeax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I tried i3 back in 2019 and I've been using it ever since on my desktop.

[-] fabhian_arkantos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Today I use Plasma, but if I need a tiling wm I use awesome. It's so great and customizable. If you're fine with Lua, is easy to config.

[-] HerrBratani@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

PaperVM. Works under gnome and has everything i need

[-] visnudeva@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago
[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Need to figure out making it work with nvidia 😭

[-] visnudeva@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I don't have any problem with hyprland on Nvidia, I didn't have to tweak anything, it worked out of the box, I just installed it on Archcraft.

[-] snamellit@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago

Works fine here. I migrated from Sway to Hyprland and it just worked. For Sway I had to work around some frustrating niggles but nothing so far for Hyprland. I use a MSI laptop with a 2070Maxq hybrid graphics setup. The performance of Wolfenstein New Order shows the nvidia is working ;-)

[-] hschen@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Starting with i3 as my first, i tried a bunch of different ones. Xmonad and Qtile were the ones i liked the most but Qtile was buggy and Xmonad while working was super confusing to configure with haskell.

Also tried AwesomeWM, it felt a bit buggy to me in terms of window handling and DWM was just too complicated to patch and even with patches it was too basic

Ended up going back to i3, and then moved over to Sway.

[-] enix@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

i3 is the one I keep coming back to

[-] linkert@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Sway with autotiling and a few nifty scripts (launch or focus and such) and Waybar. The combination of having scratchpads, sensible autotiling along with titlebars and the wonderful world of wayland is supreme.

[-] roseh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Recently I have been using river. It's extremely easy to configure via a shell script, and it's very fast and stable. It's another dwm clone

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] _s0me_guy_@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

DWM due to it's suckless nature

[-] Prologue7642@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Currently, I am using DWL and it is pretty nice. After moving to Wayland, I tried to use Sway for a while, but it does not really fit into my workflow well. But to be honest, even DWL is missing some things I want, and I am not really a fan of that it is written and configured in C. I am planning on trying to write my own tiling window manager in Rust when I have some time.

[-] Borgzilla@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Not sure if this counts as a tiling window manager, but I spend most of my time in emacs in full screen mode. I can create, delete, resize, and swap my windows.

[-] a_statistician@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure my solution counts either - I just use quicktile with default KDE, because it has the tiling bits that I need and the config file was simple enough that I didn't have to spend a whole day setting it up. I need working memory for other things besides keyboard shortcuts.

[-] nullthegrey@mastodon.social 1 points 1 year ago

@cyclohexane for me it was and always will be bspwm. Once I had it configured it was the coziest of cozies.

[-] donio@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

EXWM. I am a longtime Emacs user so merging the concepts of Emacs buffers and X windows is a huge benefit. Only one set of keybindings to worry about, all of my Emacs window management stuff works for X windows too. One less external dependency to worry about too. In a new environment (like when starting a new job etc) as long as I have my Emacs config I am good to go.

[-] notroot@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

I'll have to give it a try again. I played with it a while back, but I was happy with GNOME at the time. What underlying version of emacs are you using? native comp?

[-] donio@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

EXWM is not particularly picky about Emacs versions or performance. I used to run with nativecomp but ended up turning it off since I value stability over performance. (nativecomp was pretty stable but I had some occasional issues)

The biggest caveat is that you must be very comfortable with whatever Emacs buffer/window management setup you use since you will be relying on that even more.

[-] isotope@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I'm an EXWM user too, but I'd like to migrate to Wayland some time soon. This looks promising, but if nothing comes out of it I'll probably move to dwl-guile

[-] notroot@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Pop!_OS 20.04 LTS... I love how it combines tiling and stacking. Sure I could use workspaces instead of stacks, but with stacks... I can use both!

I've also used EXWM and am going to give it another whirl after I upgrade to emacs 28 with native comp

[-] ollien@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago

Does this support independent workspaces on each monitor? That's what kept me from using i3 on Plasma :(

[-] Scraft161@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago

I've been using dwm for a while now, I have a custom arch PKGBUILD to patch it the way I need and I'm generally satisfied with it.

the big downside is that you do need basic knowledge of C to actually configure it and quite a willingness to play around when applying patches, if you go the dwm route make sure that you're applying your patches via some script so you can easily take patches out or reorder them without having to rebuild everything from scratch, there's also a version that you can enable/disable patches and rebuild; but I haven't tried that yet.

[-] 1ipod@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] Junkdata@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I started with for a bit awm, however i am giving qtile a try since im learning how to code python so good practice.

[-] PMunch@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I use i3, but to say that I like it is a bit overstated. It's fine, does what I expect the very basic of a tiling window manager to do. I used Nimdow for a while and it's pretty good, the default bar is way better than i3 (supports ANSI colour coding, mouse presses, etc.), but I could never quite get to grips with the tiling algorithm.

I'm working on my own WM though, it's not tiling per-se, I choose to call in non-overlapping and I'm trying to solve my gripes with i3. Basically windows should not be forcefully expanded if they don't want to. Try open galculator under i3 and watch the horror. And when expanded the size should be split based on their initial sizes. So if I have Firefox open and want to do something in a quick terminal window the terminal won't get 1/2 of the screen. Firefox wanted more space than the terminal initially, so the terminal gets to take up a smaller share of the space.

[-] PapaTorque@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I really like dwm. It doesn't seem too popular so maybe the other ones are better but it was the first one I tried so the others feel weird to me. I like the idea behind suckless in general though.

[-] Nuuskis@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

I used suckless ecosystem for 5+ years, but I wanted to use Wayland so now I'm transitioning into Sway and holymoly how fast and easy it is. So simple to configure and written in C.

[-] cristo@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

I've been pleasantly surprised by sway coming from dwm. It feels as responsive and most things I patched into dwm are built in.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
32 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

45443 readers
958 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS