this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
994 points (91.3% liked)

General Discussion

12096 readers
6 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

All excellent ideas.

Now how do we afford to bribe all of the politicians to make this happen?

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 months ago

There should be something in there about universal free education

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago (3 children)

idk about merge the senate into the house. I like the idea that there is one chamber where each state has the same number of votes and one that goes by population. but hard agree on removing the house rep cap, as-is every branch of the fed is weighted toward smaller, more rural states (senate, house with rep cap, potus via electoral college, scotus because senate and potus pick scotus)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tree@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago

"Abolish corporate personhood" doesn't go far enough. Abolish corporations. Companies over a certain size should be forced to convert to either a worker-owned co-op or a non-profit organization. Human society needs to evolve past being centered around maximizing shareholder profits.

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Abolish capitol punishments
Codify body autonomy

[–] Hoomod@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Term limits on SCOTUS should be 18 years, with one Justice retiring every other year.

Unless the court expands, then the term limits could be shorter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 8 points 8 months ago

Probably get rid of the supreme Court altogether and have cases that it currently hears be heard by a random selection of federal judges.

Probably also need to get some people smarter and more specialized than me to figure out how to capture the wealth of the wealthy. Like the whole "take out a loan against your assets, use that as money, pay no taxes" thing needs to go.

While we're having fantasies, can we expand the 14th amendment "no insurrection " bit to be more clear?

And if we're feeling spiteful, add a "no one who has held office as a member of the Republican party shall be eligible for any role in government, nor any role that engages with the government such as contractor, advisor, lobbyist." Just gut the whole party.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Not sure what is called, but ban and back tax/punish people/companies who use those foreign PO boxes and claim that that company owns the IP everything that they use, so they actually made no profit, all to avoid paying taxes. And then because "made no money" they get cash from the governments.

[–] RazorsLedge@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Why do you post an image of text?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 8 points 8 months ago

You forgot land value tax. Otherwise it's looking good.

[–] chetradley@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

One more.

Now that corporations aren't people, only people can own residential land.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Whats a luxury item for purposes of VAT? You’ll be hung up forever on that.

For example cars:

  • some consider all cars a luxury we need to step away from
  • some see the reality that cars are required for most of us
  • where do you draw the line between a “necessary” car and a “luxury” car?
  • for the love of god, no special treatment for light trucks
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Wealth tax. You forgot that one. Otherwise every billionaire will suddenly make $49,999 in salary.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thezeesystem@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Don't forget to abolish slavery.. wait forgot they call it prison now.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Fully funded public news media with a legal firewall between government interests and that media. Controlled by journalists and representative members of the public. We desperately need to get working interests back into news media, nearly every flavor of our media is currently owned by corporate interests.

[–] craigers@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I would add patent law reform, and remove the ability to hold private and public office (ie you can't be a board member of Monsanto and be on the EPA), oh and no campaign donations allowed; everybody gets an equal stipend to campaign, we have the internet you don't need to go shaking babies and kissing hands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/STAR_voting

Star voting to avoid some of the potential negative outcomes of RCV

Do not merge the house and Senate. They perform different, but equally important functions, once you remove the house cap and force them to start legislating again.

Remove the illegal revision done by a single person to statute 1983 of the federal code, in 1874. This removes Qualified Immunity, and resets the law back to, "naw fam, no one, not even a Sitting President, Congressman, or SCOTUS Justice is above the law, and no one has any sort of immunity." If you need immunity to do the job, the job shouldn't be done.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/15/us/politics/qualified-immunity-supreme-court.html

It also follows that congresspeople can now be prosecuted for insider trading, and SCOTUS justices can be prosecuted for accepting bribes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Wouldn't the ban on tax preparation companies hurt mostly the middle class? The rich can just get full time accountants to handle all their finances, and these accountants will also optimize their taxes as part of the general service they provide.

[–] ma11en@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Most countries don't require the nonsense you go through at all.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 8 points 8 months ago (6 children)

The nonsense is there specifically to benefit the tax prep companies. Getting rid of one without the other isn't... Anything anyone is advocating for. You get rid of both, simultaneously, because you have to, and because it's right. How you make it work? Tax the rich, mostly

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] miridius@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ban political donations, all political parties get the same, small campaign budget and allotment of advertising space/airtime funded by the government instead

[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The BIG unintended consequence here is that this makes starting a new party just to leech off the government a big target. Who cares if you never get anyone elected, so long as you can have government paid salaries and airtime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No tax reform? It’s a great start to make taxes easier for most individuals but we shouldn’t be allowing wealthier people to pay less percentage of taxes. There’s a bewildering array of complexity that doesn’t matter to most individuals but only serves to lower the tax rate if people who can afford to take advantage of it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›