this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
143 points (98.0% liked)

Futurology

1814 readers
55 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 65 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They should be fine, that's twice minimum wage, and they say that's enough to get by.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 29 points 8 months ago

Well, yes, but they didn't think the leopard would eat their face

[–] iamdisillusioned@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago (2 children)

All these comments blaming poor boomers for having to work part-time minimum wage jobs shows that capitalistism's propaganda continues to work by getting us to believe there is a generational war when we're really in a class war. Most of us here will be in the same boat, unable to stop working in our elderly years and unable to get a job with a real wage.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The comments I'm seeing are people making fun of broke retirees for voting against their own interests not for being old.

[–] iamdisillusioned@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Do you think these underemployed elderly only exist in red states?!?

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There is a generational war. The boomers waged it against all future generations. Boomers compose the vast majority of upper class.

The generational war against boomers IS the class war.

Get a fucking clue.

[–] DrMorose@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Yes, but also no.

They don't call it the 1%, or 2%, or whatever percentage you want to use for nothing. There is still a large portion of boomers, my parents included that drank the kool-aid and by kool-aid I mean the pick yourself up by the bootstraps and work hard and you will be successful bs. They along with the rest of the leftover portion of their generation are pretty much unable to retire, just like the article points to. That is the class warfare. It doesn't matter what generation they are from it really does boil down to the haves and have nots.

The true point of Capitalism is like a big game of monopoly at the end only 1 person is going to win. There really is no other way for it to go down.

[–] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 30 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Pick yourself up by your bootstraps and buckle down. Quit wasting precious time on sleep, get a side hustle and cut out the latte. You’d be surprised what you can accomplish with a little hard work and determination!

At least that’s my prepared speech to my Dad. I’ll take my Ma on vacation while he figures it out.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 26 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Don't they own a house? Didn't they vote for this?

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 24 points 8 months ago

They voted for the future. Unfortunately, they thought they would be millionaires/billionaires in the future.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not everyone was lucky enough to buy a house…

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Didn't pull hard enough on those bootstraps

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Too much cocaine toast back in the 80s otherwise they'd be millionaires

[–] ares35@kbin.social 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

a significant number of them under 65 are, too.

[–] Conyak@lemmy.tf 12 points 8 months ago

And yet they will vote for the party that wants to cut social security and Medicare. It’s hard to feel sorry for them.

[–] dxdydz@slrpnk.net 9 points 8 months ago

How many of these own paid off homes? That makes a big difference.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 8 points 8 months ago

Keep in mind to folks that medicare pays like 80% medical costs and you need to pretty much get a supplement that costs about what your work one would cost. So they will have to live on whats left. Where I live if you want to live in your own place and be at the level where nothing is to bad you need about 3k a month or 36k a year but you need more of that due to taxes so more like 50k a year. This is not an amount you can live luxurious on.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I'll give them the same advice that they gave me: Make coffee at home. Eat less avocado toast. Learn to live without.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago

America and Canada are 3rd world countries. Terrible education systems, poor access to health care, crumbling roads, no usable public transit, lead pipes, rampant political corruption, reduced women's rights, reduced worker's rights, brutal cost of living, aging populations with no money to pay for long-term care. You tell me how free everyone is.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

Retirement, these days, is a scam to get people to waste their most fruitful years slaving away for corporations who care little for them in the vain hope that they'll finally get to live their lives when they're old and broken.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago

No elderly person deserves to live in poverty.

That said, there has never been a better time in human history to be old and retired. You've got the largest share of wealth that that demographic has ever had in history.