this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
229 points (98.3% liked)

THE POLICE PROBLEM

2470 readers
2 users here now

    The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.

    99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.

    When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.

    When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."

    When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.

    Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.

    The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.

    All this is a path to a police state.

    In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.

    Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.

    That's the solution.

♦ ♦ ♦

Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.

Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.

Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.

♦ ♦ ♦

ALLIES

!abolition@slrpnk.net

!acab@lemmygrad.ml

r/ACAB

r/BadCopNoDonut/

Randy Balko

The Civil Rights Lawyer

The Honest Courtesan

Identity Project

MirandaWarning.org

♦ ♦ ♦

INFO

A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions

Adultification

Cops aren't supposed to be smart

Don't talk to the police.

Killings by law enforcement in Canada

Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom

Killings by law enforcement in the United States

Know your rights: Filming the police

Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)

Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.

Police lie under oath, a lot

Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak

Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street

Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States

So you wanna be a cop?

When the police knock on your door

♦ ♦ ♦

ORGANIZATIONS

Black Lives Matter

Campaign Zero

Innocence Project

The Marshall Project

Movement Law Lab

NAACP

National Police Accountability Project

Say Their Names

Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

    A judgment was entered Friday in favor of Jonathan Guessford, 54, who said in the lawsuit that police unlawfully prevented him from engaging in peaceful protest by standing on the roadside and holding up a small cardboard sign reading “Radar Ahead!”
    After Guessford raised a middle finger at troopers while driving away from an initial encounter, he was stopped and cited for “improper use of a hand signal.” The charge was later dropped.
    The episode on March 11, 2022, was captured on cell phone videos taken by Guessford and included in his complaint, as well as on dashboard cameras in the vehicles of Corporal Stephen Douglas, Trooper Nicholas Gallo and Master Corporal Raiford Box.
    Police dashcam audio captures the troopers laughing and giggling at the notion of citing Guessford for using an improper hand turn signal because of the obscene gesture. “He wasn’t making a turn,” Douglas says.
    The cell phone video shows troopers approaching Guessford, who was standing in a grassy area next to the shoulder of Route 13 north of Dover. Douglas told Guessford that he was “disrupting traffic,” while Gallo, based on a witness report, said Guessford was “jumping into traffic.”
    “You are a liar,” Guessford told Gallo. “I’m on the side of the road, legally parked, with a sign which is protected by the First Amendment,” he told troopers.
    Dascham video shows Douglas twice lunging at Guessford to prevent him from raising his sign. Gallo then ripped it from his hands and tore it up.
    “Could you stop playing in traffic now?” Gallo sarcastically asked Guessford.
    As Guessford drove away, he made an obscene hand gesture at the troopers. Dashcam video shows Douglas racing after him at speeds of more than 100 miles per hour (160 kilometers per hour) in a 55 mph zone, followed closely by Gallo and Box.
    “Is there a reason why you were doing that?” Douglas asked Guessford after he pulled him over.
    Box told Guessford he was engaging in “disorderly conduct” and opened the front passenger door of Guessford’s vehicle.
    “Take it to court. That’s what I want you to do,” Box replied after Guessford told troopers he was going to take legal action. Box also threatened to charge Guessford with resisting arrest.
    “We’re going to take you in. We’re going to tow the car, and we’ll call social services for the kid,” Box said, referring to Guessford’s young son, who was with Guessford and witnessed his profanity-laden tirade against the officers. “It’s not a threat, it’s a promise,” Box added.
    Box’s dashcam audio also captures his subsequent phone call with a supervisor, Lt. Christopher Popp, in which Box acknowledges that citing Guessford for his hand gesture is “pushing it.”
    “You can’t do that,” Popp tells Box. “That will be dropped.”
    “Yeah, it’s gonna get dropped,” Box replies. “I told (Douglas) it’s definitely going to get thrown out. … I said, ‘Ah, that’s not really going to fly, buddy.’”
    Douglas is heard saying that even if the charge would be dropped, it at least “inconvenienced” Guessford.

    Notice, there's no penalty at all for the laughing cops and their gently scolding supervisor, Lt. Christopher Popp.

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] matthewc@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Threatening to have his kid taken away and the other officers letting him arrest Guessford even though they know Guessford did nothing wrong. In fact the cops destroyed Guessford’s property.

Horrible.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah sounds like compensation is the least of what should be happening, those officers should be severely reprimanded.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

This type of deliberate violation of civil rights ought to result in being instantly fired and permanently blacklisted from ever being a police officer again, in any jurisdiction anywhere.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If by severely reprimanded you mean spend a couple years in prison for deprivation of rights under color of law, I'd agree.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seriously fuck cops. Look at all the bullshit they tried pulling here and would have gotten away if not for cell phone videos.

[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago

"improper use of a hang signal"

🤣🤣🤣🖕 absolutely the proper use of a hand signal, get fucked piggy!

[–] kitonthenet@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hope these guys one day do 100mph into the side of a dump truck 🙏

[–] PrunesMakeYouPoop@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, that would hurt the dump truck and possibly hurt the dump truck driver. In this instance, it would be better if they crashed into something that would not hurt someone innocent or their property.

[–] kitonthenet@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe, but probably not imo, a cruiser vs a dump truck the truck wins every day

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

truck would be company property too, not the driver's problem if it needs to get fixed

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Like their own police station then?