this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
456 points (86.1% liked)

News

23627 readers
2728 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The most famous forms of Holocaust denial and revisionism tend to focus on Jews, casting doubt, for example, on how many were exterminated in the camps. But denying the impact the Nazis had on the other groups they targeted, including queer and trans people, disabled people and Romani people, is still Holocaust denial. Maybe someone should tell J.K. Rowling.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 118 points 9 months ago (3 children)

She knows she is doing it and doesnt care.

Like every conservative, they just want queer people dead, unless its their own children.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 73 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (23 children)

She's not a conservative, she's a liberal (in the political science sense of the word, not the USian synonym for leftist).

It's not 100% clear where Rowling's transphobia comes from. She certainly fits into the group of transphobic cis women who have been abused by cis men and concluded that all men are evil, including the ones that want to be women.

But there's also a dynamic which I think you can see with Graham Linehan and Dave Chappelle as well. Born into comfortable middle-class families, well-educated, never really thought about their bog-standard liberalism. Became extremely successful, became accustomed to near universal adoration, made a thoughtless transphobic comment/skit, received criticism and reacted with absolute fury at the idea they could possibly be prejudiced about anything. Because they're liberals, you see.

All three just keep digging that hole deeper rather than face up to the idea that maybe they got something wrong. Linehan's career is over (as is his marriage), Dave Chappelle is hanging on by a thread and flirting with the right, and Rowling doesn't give a shit because she's a billionaire and does not have to give a shit about anything at all.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 9 months ago

She's a blairist, and blairists are only slightly less morally bankrupt thatcherites.

For all their sins, a true European style liberal wouldn't want the state to tell you which restroom you use or what medical treatment they have access to - of course they also believe that trans people that were born into poor families don't deserve access to any medical treatment at all but that's another story.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children)

She's not a conservative, she's a liberal...

You are mixing definitions.

In fiscal policy, "conservatism" is opposite "liberalism".

In social policy, "conservatism" is opposite "progressivism".

No one here is accusing this homophobic bridge troll of having conservative fiscal policy.

She is socially conservative. And as such, she is a bigot. There can be no defense of her from anyone who is not a bigot.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Her world views are absolutely conservative by today’s standard. Especially her views on gender roles. I mean have you read Harry Potter when you were younger? All important characters that actually shape the plot are male. She went out of her way to give Harry different father figures, believing that‘s what a boy needs when he grows up. But it‘s enough when his mother just loved him. Her female characters are far less layered than the male ones and more often than not reduced to mere tropes. The most prominent one being the pedantically strict auntie, a template which wich gets pasted a lot. There’s also the crazy auntie character and the tomboy. But that‘s pretty much it, really. Hermione herself ranges between overly strict and tomboy throughout the books and the only way she managed to escape this pattern is by… magic plastic surgery to shrink her front teeth. Rowling has clearly defined genders to be a black or white kind of thing for herself and she clearly outlined which gender has to fill what role.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 89 points 9 months ago (6 children)

The amount of people defending her statements in this thread is absolutely disgusting. I wonder why she feels so emboldened as to say such horrific things in public?

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Because people can't tell the difference between the Israeli government and a random jewish person in North America that has nothing to do with anything

[–] Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

It’s honestly upsetting to see.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 81 points 9 months ago (7 children)

I thought it was pretty well known that the Nazi party destroyed the first thing we would consider a Trans hospital?

She should have done a tiny bit of googling.

Third result on Google was the right wiki page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institut_f%C3%BCr_Sexualwissenschaft

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 79 points 9 months ago (41 children)

Ok, fellas: the intention of the author is inaccessible, the intention of the work can be interpreted, her public persona is that of a transphobe who always finds new lows to fall to in her brigade. You can still read HP and recognize that she is a shitty person.

[–] Canadian_anarchist@lemmy.ca 50 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Pro tip: used book sales do not generate royalties. I bought the full set of HP from a local used bookstore with no guilt.

[–] Aleric@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Acquiring a copy on the open ocean also provides no royalties.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 19 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Sure but used book stores are great, you can find some weird shit sometimes. Serisously I once found an old ass copy of dianetics in the sci-fi section, old lady running the place found it great that I got her little joke.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I will wait until she dies so she can't profit from it. I know it's a drop in the bucket but it's my drop.

She had a choice. Her Twatter account could have just been happy stuff about Harry Potter. She repeatedly choose to create this situation. So fuck her she isn't getting a cent from me.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago (2 children)

My kids are trans/have trans friends and they square this circle by believing that "J.K. Rowling" is Danny Devito's pen name

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 71 points 9 months ago (59 children)

It's almost like conservatives are vile, grotesque garbage-based life forms who thrive on the misery and death of others.

Conservatism is a plague long overdue for a cure.

load more comments (59 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 47 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (49 children)

Once I found out that Harry Potter glorified the British class system by having it take place at an elite private school where people less privileged than them are looked down upon and even called names I was already turned off... but once I got to the obviously antisemitic goblins, I was done.

I wish it wasn't so damn popular.

Edit: I realize this article isn't about antisemitism. This is just another example of Rowling's bigotry.

[–] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago (8 children)

I don't care about HP, but it's just a standard fairy tale. I read the books to my kids. Stories about knights, kings, princesses, super heroes...pretty much any story in which a normal person can fantasize about being someone who has much more power than they do, have been the stock-in-trade for story-tellers forever. Harry Potter lives a terrible life with his abusive relatives until he gets whisked off to a fancy private school where, it turns out, he is pretty special. Does it glorify the British class system? Sure, in some ways. But, it also undermines it insofar as Harry's friends are mostly from the lower classes, and the villains are mostly "old money" and those who are obsessed with genetic purity. Also, the entrenched authorities like the Ministry of Magic are shown in a rather poor light, with their dementors, cruel bureaucrats, and insanity-inducing prisons. Hermione is meant to symbolize someone who got to Hogwart's based on ability, not birth or connections. So, the story is at least partially about the transformation of the old structures of power from being based on money and birth to being based on ability. It shows British power structures in transition, I would say. What do you think?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (48 replies)
[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

It's sad that she's likely repressing a LOT of gender dysphoria, but just doubles down on the bigotry and hate. Fuck JK Umbridge.

All direct quotes:

I believe I could have been persuaded to turn myself into the son my father had openly said he’d have preferred.

As I didn’t have a realistic possibility of becoming a man back in the 1980s, it had to be books and music that got me through.

I remember how mentally sexless I felt in youth.

Fortunately for me, I found my own sense of otherness, and my ambivalence about being a woman...

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] mellowheat@suppo.fi 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

JK Rowling is one of the many people who never should've gone to Twitter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 31 points 9 months ago (3 children)

It is an interesting question, is she denying this because she hates jews or because she hates trans

[–] poo@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] moitoi@feddit.de 24 points 9 months ago (19 children)

She is transphobic, ableist, handiphobic, etc.

The saddest is that we will always find a fan boy taking her defense. Seriously, stop! She is garbage.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

The type of Holocaust denial they're suggesting she's doing wouldn't make her antisemitic, because she's not denying its impact on the Jewish people. It just makes her more transphobic, which we already knew.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A piece of shit said a shitty thing. No need to dwell on it.

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I think it's important she's called out. Her works are deep in the hearts of 3 generations and her shitty takes need to be addressed so those fans don't make the same choices.

Just like Bill Cosby, its important for everyone to know how much a skeezebag he is because he shaped the lives of so many people

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

Lotta dipshits in the comments here, block button is working extra today.

[–] markon@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fuck J.K. Rowling. Femcel. Lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›