How many times does God need to tell us that gender reveal parties have to stop before we listen?
this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
156 points (95.3% liked)
News
22855 readers
4246 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
i don't believe they are a real thing
Gender or parties?
Or gods?
They dont know what happened? That pilot used a crop dusting plane to do a strafing run, realized he was headed nose first into some palm trees and yanked up on the yoke. He sheered the wing straight off his plane and died for the mistake.
Sure that’s what caused the crash, but why did the wing snap? It didn’t look like the plane was in overspeed, and the airframe should be able to sustain any input maneuvers under normal flight conditions.
the airframe should be able to sustain any input maneuvers under normal flight conditions.
Let me frame it this way for you, my car's pretty reliable, but at high speeds I know that making a hard turn will end in catastrophe.
making a hard turn will end in catastrophe
Sure, if you end up smashing into a tree. But it’s not like the wheels are going to snap off or the body buckle. If you’re on an empty airfield tarmac, it would be perfectly safe. On some cars there will be a risk of rollover, but designing cars that tip over when extreme input is applied is itself fairly controversial.
Sure, if you end up smashing into a tree. But it’s not like the wheels are going to snap off or the body buckle. If you’re on an empty airfield tarmac, it would be perfectly safe. On some cars there will be a risk of rollover, but designing cars that tip over when extreme input is applied is itself fairly controversial.
Oh God, please tell me you don't have a driver's license if you think any of this bad logic is a reasonable rebuttle.
Ok, let's forget the trees or any scenery for a moment. Let's say they don't exist, and that the plane is in an open, and empty area.
Planes are very finicky things. If the angles aren't right, it won't be able to fly. If you look at an airplane wing from the side, they are normally shaped a bit like long tear drops. After gaining it's initial momentum, the plane is kind of lifted by gliding through the air pressure. Plane wings are shaped that way to make the air move faster over the top of the wing. When the air moves faster, the pressure of that air decreases. So the pressure on the top of the wing is less than the pressure on the bottom of the wing. The difference in pressure creates a force on the wing that lifts the wing of the plane up into the air.
Airplanes are full of many things that are pretty complex. If we changed airplanes to be able to "roll over" for safety, we would lose that special system that allows the lift to happen.
Since planes are so finicky, planes with different purposes will usually be built differently. Since they still have to be able to fly, adding one thing may sometimes means removing another thing. Those particular planes were never meant to make those maneuvers, and they weren't built to handle them. It would be like upgrading a car's engine block to be turbo-powered, then keeping the same coolant system and expecting it to run fine. You have to respect the equipment and follow guidelines, as they are usually there for a good reason.
The idea was that everyone would know not to do that (via their pilot licence), and that it would be ok to have specialty planes. The plane was never meant to move that way, and the wings weren't fortified for those angles.
This is a crop duster, not a stunt plane. It's not designed for that maneuver, so if you try, wings snap off. Iow, not normal flight conditions. Unlike civil engineers, you can't slap a factor of safety of 10 on an airplane. It won't fly.
I think you’re underestimating his speed and overestimating the strength of airframes. Most planes can easily get to speeds where inputs can exceed structural limits under normal flight conditions. There is even a V speed for it, Va or maneuvering speed. A quick google suggests that Vne, or “never exceed” for the PA 25 is -35 knots and Va is 104 knots. Now I have never flown one and I haven’t completely verified them but they sound about right. At 104 knots he can over G the airframe. Assuming a standard safety factor of 1.5 and a g limit of 3.8 (basic assumptions but I can’t find actual data for the PA25) and at max weight you can expect severe structural damage with full control inputs at 127 knots. If he wasn’t carrying that much and was lighter that number comes down as well. Finally, there’s the fact that it was a crop duster in Mexico so who knows what the maintenance history and actual condition of that wing spar was. Either way, even if it was in top form hitting 130 knots on a show boating low pass isn’t that crazy.
The pilot has probably been beating on the airframe like this for years.
Gender reveal parties were a mistake. The woman who started them had miscarried every time before, so was celebrating every little milestone of her pregnancy, but people took the idea and started using it as excuse to show off and try to one up other folks.
I don't mind people doing whatever they want but a lot of them are just not to my liking, but neither are Tupperware parties...I just don't care about either.
A lot of these end up as headlines though, I feel that those involved would likely be headline regardless. In this case it is just unfortunate.
Tupperware also carries the stench of MLM with it. Too bad since its generally pretty solid stuff. Waiting to find out the gender until birth was an interesting social experiment for my wife and I. It bothered some people more than we expected and others less.
That’s like a prompt to a twilight zone episode. 😬
Equivalent exchange. You’ve got to take a life to make a life.
Imagine learning in your teens that your gender is a pink-smoking plane crash claiming a pilot.
I remember the good days when things were simple, when you were either an Apache Attack helicopter or you weren't.
Damn I have an Uncle that thinks that joke is still hilarious. Absolute lead-poisoned dumbass.
*genital reveal party
Yeah, gender is a separate thing now.
Nice click bait picture The Hill
Was just about to point out they could have taken any of the 1000 frames from the video of the actual incident but instead chose a stock photo.
They also had an option to use a stock photo of the actual aircraft type on the ground.
Why is the image for this article a passenger jet plane? The actual airplane that folded like paper mache was a tiny single engine propeller plane
I assume that the jet pictured in the original post has nothing to do with the plane that crashed?
You would be correct. It was a single prop.
It's a girl!
It was a boy.
You've gotta be fuckin kidding me.
It much to report on here… until you can explain why the wing snapped.
Seems like the wing snapped because he pulled up too hard with a plane that wasn’t designed for it.
my guess is it wasn't maintained properly as well. that wing definitely failed because he pulled up harder than he should have, but it may have been due to material fatigue as a contributing factor.
either way... the pilot is probably the guy that maintains it.
Is there a place to see how many lives gender reveal parties have claimed?
oh great, gender reveal plane crashes
Jesus, is that made out of paper mache?
Jesus: sí.
That plane looked like it was made out of cardboard and duct-tape.
If you look at the ground, an air cannon blasts smoke and confetti right below where the wing snaps upward.
My guess is there was already upward force on the wing when doing the low pass, and the air cannon burst collided with the airstream.
The timing is too perfect for it to be unrelated. Fuck your babies gender.
Idk that air cannons at a different angle. My money is on poor aircraft maintenance coupled with pilot error of pulling up too quickly with too much speed.
C'mon. The wings fell off the airplane. Pilot obviously spent years beating the shit out of the airframe and the wingbox finally failed.
Legit looked like that plane was something the wright brothers made