this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
117 points (88.7% liked)

World News

32498 readers
881 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A former Central Valley High school teacher’s “predatory actions” stripped a student of his dreams and significantly harmed him and his family after the teacher had sex with the 17-year-old, the student’s mother told a judge Thursday.

McKenna Kindred, 25, will receive no jail time – recommended by the prosecution and defense – after she pleaded guilty Thursday to amended charges of second-degree sexual misconduct with a minor and communication with a minor for immoral purposes, both gross misdemeanors.

Spokane County Superior Court Judge Dean Chuang sentenced Kindred to two years of probation and $700 in fines and fees. She must register as a sex offender for 10 years.

Students came forward in December 2022 to describe the inappropriate relationship between Kindred and her teacher’s assistant.

The teen’s classmates told school officials he was inappropriately messaging Kindred via Instagram and that he was defensive when they questioned him about the relationship, according to court documents. Kindred also reported to administration she was being harassed by someone on social media, accusing her of a sexual relationship with a student that she denied.

The teen’s mother later told law enforcement her son had a sexual relationship with Kindred, that he’d been to her house alone with her and that the two had been sharing explicit photos over Instagram, court records say. Detectives did not find photographs “that appeared overtly sexual in nature,” documents say. There were messages referencing masturbation.

The teenager was interviewed at his home and admitted he’d begun messaging Kindred in June 2022. He told police he visited Kindred’s house and that they had sex. He also admitted to sharing explicit pictures and videos with Kindred, according to court records.

Central Valley School District said last year Kindred had resigned.

The student’s mother told Chuang that Kindred’s actions were an “abuse of power” and that she started to “groom” him when he was 16.

She said her son was unable to finish high school on campus, which affected him socially, emotionally and academically. He also lost some of his youth and missed out on major milestones.

The woman said her son played soccer since he was 18 months old, but Kindred’s criminal actions forced his plans to change.

“A light he used to carry has been dimmed,” she said.

The mother said she agreed to the attorneys’ sentencing recommendations, so the case did not drag out any longer.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Numberone@startrek.website 58 points 8 months ago (11 children)

The word rape doesn't show up in that entire article. Must be some kind of mistake. I wonder why that would happen?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 43 points 8 months ago

Because that is not the name of the crime in Washington. It says sexual misconduct, which is the name of the crime.

https://app.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=504-26-221

Washington has a surprisingly modern discussion of consent in that law, but conspicuously missing is anything about abuse of a position of power, which is typically used in these exact cases (teacher-student, prison guard-inmate, police-detainee, etc.). Honestly if that's not part of the law in WA I'm not sure how they figure it's illegal under this law.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 28 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I was going to say it's likely because the age of consent is 16 in Washington. It is but there are exceptions for being over 5 year difference in age (she's outside of the age range) and for a teacher and student.

https://codes.findlaw.com/wa/title-9a-washington-criminal-code/wa-rev-code-9a-44-093/

So this should definitely result in a class C felony.

[–] afterthoughts@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So it's rape in some places but not others?

Weird how rape works.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

And there are a creepy amount of sites dedicated to figuring out the law in each area. You would think simply avoiding having sex with people under 18 would be a pretty easy task but I feel there may be a scary amount of people that are actively seeking that out.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I wonder why that would happen?

Because this is an article about a specific case that didn't involve a charge of rape I imagine?

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

An adult having sex with a minor is rape.

[–] afterthoughts@lemmy.ca -1 points 8 months ago

Statutory rape is not the same as having sex with someone against their will.

We should be saying "willing" or "unwilling" to get this point across without seeming like we're trying to manipulate others.

[–] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

that didn’t involve a charge of rape

Y'know, I was going to ask if you really believed that minors can consent to sexual activity(because they can't; plooking a minor is LITERALLY SUPPOSED TO BE FEDERAL STATUTORY RAPE); but your home fed is programming.dev and I should really know better than to ask a techbro that question by now. Like, it is an even 50/50 that if I walk back through your history, I'm gonna find some shady bullshit about what you think about the age of consent with how techbros are these days.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 8 points 8 months ago

The age of consent in Washington is 16.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 44 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But a man teacher would get 20 years. Double standard bull shit.

[–] afterthoughts@lemmy.ca -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, females tend to regret having sex in their teenage years way more often than males.

[–] B0rax@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago

What does this have to do with anything?

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is noone else gonna point out the absurdity that if the guy had been 1 year older, legally speaking there would've been nothing wrong?

The problem here is the grooming (which I think it's worth noting that adults can be victims of as well), the abuse of power dynamics, and particularly in this case the exploitation of another's inexperience for personal gratification.

But the article instead focuses on how the kid was "affected" by the teacher's "criminal actions", but then essentially just describes the kinds of consequences caused by the social stigma of student-teacher relationships. But this also happens in university, where it also carries negative social consequences, but not legal ones.

My point is simply that the legal system is a flimsy caricature of morality/ethics, and in articles like these it really shows.

[–] JeffreyOrange@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How is this world news? Seems pretty local.

[–] Murvel@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It's a recurring theme in the US school system. And it seems to be primarily female teachers going after boy students, which makes it noteworthy.

[–] JeffreyOrange@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

With that logic a shitton of local news would be world news. This is at best US News but not world news.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Teacher rapes student, avoids jail time.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If they were sharing pictures wouldn't that maker her eligible for CSAM resulting in further charges?

[–] ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago

While the boy admitted to sharing photos, it also said they didn’t find any so there may have been a lack of evidence for that.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I know I wasn’t the only one wondering.

[–] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Mmmh. White woman privilege is realer than a mf. Let "McKenna Kindred" be a 250lb. Black man from Chi-town; Kindred would've got turned into red and gray paint splatters against their bedroom wall by a fuckin SWAT team at unholy-o'clock in the morning. But y'know, because she's the complexion of Emmett Till's killer, it's all sweet as poundcake.

Bullshit assed country, stg. Death to the settler empire.

[–] Murvel@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

Whoa, calm down there chief, you'll blow a fuse or something

[–] FeelThePower@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Crazy that someone can literally plead guilty and barely face any consequences.

[–] afterthoughts@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Remus

Man admitted to killing his wife during prohibition after she divorced him while he was in jail and sold all of his belongings.

He was acquitted.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] sYnoxjj@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wait. So did the 17 year old not want it or what is happening here?

Why are the comments here calling for rape or 20 years?

  • Just to make absolutely clear: im not endorsing, neither talking down sex with minors
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

In most US jurisdictions, an adult having unforced (for lack of a better word) sex with a minor is classified as "statutory rape" due to minors being legally incapable of consenting.

[–] afterthoughts@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

Yes, which is why it's more fruitful to say willing or unwilling. You people have misused the word so much it has lost meaning. Congratulations.

It's dumb how someone can be 'raped' in one jurisdiction, but not raped in another.

People want to conflate rape with having sex with 17 year olds because it elicits shock value in those who don't know any better.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The entire legal system is set up to protect the average creep, and maintains legitimacy by throwing the most overt abusers under the bus.

[–] afterthoughts@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago

No it's not.