188
submitted 3 months ago by ptz@dubvee.org to c/news@lemmy.world

Slashdot summary:

Matthew David Keirans, 58, was convicted of one count of false statement to a National Credit Union Administration insured institution -- punishable by up to 30 years in federal prison -- and one count of aggravated identity theft -- punishable by up to two years in federal prison. Keirans worked as a systems architect in the hospital's IT department from June 28, 2013 to July 20, 2023, when he was terminated for misconduct related to the identity theft investigation. Keirans worked at the hospital under the name William Donald Woods, an alias he had been using since about 1988, when he worked with the real William Woods at a hot dog cart in Albuquerque, N.M. [...] By 2013, Keirans had moved to eastern Wisconsin. He started his IT job with UI Hospitals and worked remotely. He earned more than $700,000 in his 10 years working for the hospital. In 2023, his salary was $140,501, according to the hospital.

In 2019, the real William Woods was homeless, living in Los Angeles. He went to a branch of the national bank and explained that he recently discovered someone was using his credit and had accumulated a lot of debt. Woods didn't want to pay the debt and asked to know the account numbers for any accounts he had open at the bank so he could close them. Woods gave the bank employee his real Social Security card and an authentic California Identification card, which matched the information the bank had on file. Because there was a large amount of money in the accounts, the bank employee asked Woods a series of security questions that he was unable to answer. The bank employee called Keirans, whose the phone number was connected to the accounts. He answered the security questions correctly and said no one in California should have access to the accounts. The employee called the Los Angeles Police Department, and officers spoke with Woods and Keirans. Keirans faxed the Los Angeles officers a copy of Woods' Social Security card and birth certificate, as well as a Wisconsin driver's license Keirans had acquired under Woods' name. The driver's license had the name William David Woods -- David is Keirans' real middle name -- rather than William Donald Woods. When questioned, Keiran told an LAPD officer he sometimes used David as a middle name, but his real name was William Donald Woods. The real Woods was arrested and charged with identity theft and false impersonation, under a misspelling of Keirans' name: Matthew Kierans.

Because Woods continued to insist, throughout the judicial process, that he was William Woods and not Matthew Kierans, a judge ruled in February 2020 that he was not mentally competent to stand trial and he was sent to a mental hospital in California, where he received psychotropic medication and other mental health treatment. In March 2021, Woods pleaded no contest to the identity theft charges -- meaning he accepted the conviction but did not admit guilt. He was sentenced to two years imprisonment with credit for the two years he already served in the county jail and the hospital and was released. He was also ordered to pay $400 in fines and to stop using the name William Woods. He did not stop. Woods continued to attempt to regain his identity by filing customer disputes with financial organizations in an attempt to clear his credit report. He also reached out to multiple law enforcement agencies, including the Hartland Police Department in Wisconsin, where Keirans lived. Woods eventually discovered where Keirans was working, and in January 2023 he reached out to the University of Iowa Hospitals' security department, who referred his complaint to the University of Iowa Police Department.

University of Iowa Police Detective Ian Mallory opened an investigation into the case. Mallory found the biological father listed on Woods' birth certificate -- which both Woods and Keirans had sent him an official copy of -- and tested the father's DNA against Woods' DNA. The test proved Woods was the man's son. On July 17, 2023, Mallory interviewed Keirans. He asked Keirans what his father's name was, and Keirans accidentally gave the name of his own adoptive father. Mallory then confronted Keirans with the DNA evidence, and Keirans responded by saying, "my life is over" and "everything is gone." He then confessed to the prolonged identity theft, according to court documents.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 50 points 3 months ago

The original guy should be able to collect social security on the bad guy’s earnings.

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 44 points 3 months ago

It’s kind of weird that you can get 30 years for lying to a credit union once, but only 2 for stealing someone’s identity for 30 years.

If the victim is a federally insured financial institution you get a huge jail sentence.
But if the victim is a person with no safety net, it’s a comparative slap on the wrist.
Skewed priorities.

[-] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 months ago

I hope the real Keirans has enough to be worth suing. No way he didn't know some poor guy was sitting in jail for years because of him. What was it all about?

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It sounds like the real guy's story was quite sad. He was apparently mentally ill when he was thrown in jail, and (not stated in the article) possibly freaked out instead of being able to deal with the LE and administrative bureaucracies about the name misuse. So they decided there was nothing to his story and locked him up. Obviously this was triggered by the ID theft, but it also seems like a system failure in that the discrepancy wasn't solved and the fake guy caught, at that time. The real guy instead went through a court case and served 2 years after pleading no contest for the "ID theft" of using his actual real name.

The fake guy on the other hand did the identity theft in his early 20s, bouncing some checks to steal a car under the other guy's name (the other guy got in trouble over that, but it's unclear how much). He got a fast food job under the fake name, and eventually worked his way up to a high paying hospital IT job where he worked and paid his taxes for 10 years til the ID theft fell apart. It's not stated whether he got up to other bad stuff using the fake name.

The fake guy now faces 2 years in prison for aggravated ID theft and 30 years for "false statement to a National Credit Union Administration insured institution". That is a pretty surprising difference betwen the two. I wonder what his actual sentences will be. He is 58 now.

It's worth reading the article in this instance as covers a fair amount of detail. It's hard to tell whether it's a story of a mostly-reformed ex-scumbag trying to escape from his past, or if he continued to be up to other stuff as well.

Added: I got confused, the real guy's arrest was in 2019, not decades earlier. So the fake guy lied to the police with false documents relatively recently resulting in the real guy getting locked up, not so good.

[-] tyler@programming.dev 22 points 3 months ago

I don’t think he was mentally ill! The judge thought he was because he wouldn’t stop claiming he was who he actually was. They literally put a dude in jail for claiming he was himself! Like what else is he supposed to do? Go steal someone else’s identity?

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

He was homeless, so they obviously assumed he was mentally ill

[-] FuryMaker@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

The real Woods get compensated for jail and mental institution?

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

He should get access to all the money and property made under his name.

For a start.

[-] protist@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Damn, what a rollercoaster. This story is ripe for a screenplay

[-] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Yeah, that's what I was thinking. This would make a fantastic movie.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 14 points 3 months ago

It never said why. Why did he use the alias?

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 13 points 3 months ago

He’d already stolen a car under his first name from his parents. My guess is mostly that he had a clean record, with potential discomfort with his family name (the article points out he’s adopted, which feels… either gross or like there’s missing context, but stealing a car from your parents isn’t a symptom of a great relationship).

[-] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 months ago

a judge ruled in February 2020 that he was not mentally competent to stand trial and he was sent to a mental hospital in California, where he received psychotropic medication and other mental health treatment.

Profoundly fucked up. God knows what this guy went through at the clinic for telling the truth

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 12 points 2 months ago

The whole story read like a thriller novel where the protagonist was being gaslighted from page one. Just absolutely horrifying to know someone went through that.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I read about a particular book that is responsible for so many cases of identity theft similar to this guy's story. Even knowing all the tricks and stuff used in the book, it's very hard to catch someone once they use it to disappear/become someone else.

[-] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago
[-] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Identity Theft for Dummies

[-] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Is on Amazon? I'll give you my card number if you'll order it for me 😍

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If the thing that talked about it actually named the book, I would have said the name of the book. It's literally banned by the FBI, so it's not like you'd find a copy in America.

[-] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Who said that I was in America? A book that is banned by the FBI? Are you high right now or just being funny? Banning any book in the US is against the first amendment..

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We're literally in the midst of a book banning epidemic over here that started surging in 2021. Half the country doesn't give a shit about the rules or freedom.

[-] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Name some books I can't find playa

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[-] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Ma'am this is in reference to public school libraries...you don't know the title to the book that is banned that you referred to...so apparently you don't know if it's banned or not huh? Take a moment to look at your hand..Do you have a pipe in it? That's what I thought.. just sit it down for a while.. 😔

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So you didn't actually read the list in the second link, which is all bans issued by various parts of the federal government.

[-] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah I saw it..are you referring to the one book in 2010 regarding classified military information from a veteran or the Mafia one in 92 because it contains incorrect information about federal taxes because the rest of those books are from the 70s and way earlier.. And they are all available.. You want to keep digging for some better evidence for your claim cutie pie? Because I haven't been to a school library in a hot minute and as far as buying a physical book... better ask somebody cuz

this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
188 points (98.0% liked)

News

21707 readers
3689 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS