this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
234 points (93.7% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2174 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TLDR: Totalling roughly $144 billion for about 4 million borrows.

Article is from March 29th, 2024

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 86 points 7 months ago (3 children)

9% of total loans, and a lot are people who should have already been discharged through existing programs.

The thing is, someone thought it was a good idea to put the people making money off student loans in charge of forgiveness programs, so all types of shady shit was happening.

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 40 points 7 months ago (3 children)

If he was able to get the original loan forgiveness he wanted, my wife and I would have replaced a car with a newer one, or maybe bought a second car. As it stands now, I guess we will be driving ours for a while. I guess the student loan providers wanted our money more than the stock market.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

We were in a similar position, intending to reinvest in our home, get a utility trailer, while saving up more for land one day.

Conservatives fucked that up. But I appreciate Biden for trying.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

It's never about making it better. It's always about shoving as much money in their pockets as possible.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Ah, yes, the people with the true say in this country, lobbyists with buckets of money.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

LOL that keeps being my thought of... Wait why is it a good thing we took this long to help people that were scammed and forgive the people that were well past it being owed to them.

It is sad that we are at praising bare minimum of by the books. We are too used to people being fucked over.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

That's like when they say "Biden forgave more student loan debt than anyone"....

Well, it wasn't really an issue until 20 maybe 30 years ago, and few people are paying them off

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

Good!

Now do that much again!

Get people spending their limited paychecks on goods the economy is producing, instead of paying interest to some misers. In the 1%-er's bank, it will just sit and effectively be taken out of circulation and the economy.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

Trump cut taxes for billionaires and corporations. Republicans are upset that Biden is canceling student loans. The right is unreal.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (4 children)

The problem is those aren't real numbers.

For example:

You can get your debt cancelled if:

  1. You've made payments for more than 10 years. AND:

  2. You borrowed less than $12,000.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/02/21/fact-sheet-president-biden-cancels-student-debt-for-more-than-150000-student-loan-borrowers-ahead-of-schedule

So, first, who the hell takes out less than $12,000 in student loans?

Second, of those who took out less than $12,000, who is still paying a significant amount after 10 years?

Oh, you only took out $8,000? Good for you... Oh, but it was 6 years ago? Sorry, come back in 4 years.

So they can say "Oh, we cancelled xx$ in student debt." But the reality is, they are doing it in a way that nobody can actually USE.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Theyre canceling interest...

Like you said, if they borrowed that little and paid back so long. There's no way they haven't paid the original loan back.

I feel like being honest about that, wouldn't make Biden look as good, but will make more people support it.

Limit the amount of interest, say 50% of loan amount, after that the balance never increases and principle just goes down.

If you borrowed 12k and have paid over 18k, you're done.

The interest is what's killing people, not the principals.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

When my kid was getting ready to go to college, we went to all the FAFSA seminars and filled out all the forms and what not.

He got accepted by his top three schools, UC Davis, Lewis and Clark, and the University of Oregon Honors College.

Each one of them came back and told us the same thing...

"Well, with student assistance, scholarships, and so on, we think you should take out parental plus loans of $56,000 a year."

And my reaction was:

a) That's oddly specific.

Followed by:

b) Wow, what are the chances that one out of state school and two in-state schools all commonly decided on the same oddly specific number?

Why it's almost like it's about "How much can we milk them for?" instead of "Here's how much college costs."

So we said "fuck that noise" and enrolled him as a normal student at the University of Oregon.

Tuition was $10,000 a year, he had a scholarship that paid $5,000, I ran the other $5,000 through my Amazon card for points, gave him a 2nd card for expenses and rent, and 4 years later he had a degree and 0 debt.

He's now a data scientist in the AI field and paid me back in cash. LOL.

But I could see OTHER parents going "Well, three schools all told us $56,000 a year, I guess that's just what school costs now..."

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago

Or see that and think "they'll have better opportunities going to a better university" when for the most part people don't really care where you got the degree, just that you did, it's vaguely relevant, and accredited

If you can do that for a fifth the cost and no outstanding debt, seems foolish to pay what the big unis are commanding

Also, congrats to your kid, that's a great field to be in right now

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

0% interest. Pay back what you borrowed. People shouldn't be getting rich off of poor people's education.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 5 points 7 months ago

They are using a way that should have already been done since those were the rules we agreed to but haven't followed for the last couple decades.

These are basically fake loans that should be a sign of a terrifying bubble about to burst except somebody made it impossible to ever get your schooling loans removed no matter how much you got scammed or should have it paid down by now.

It's almost like fixing a whoopsie of loophole that let even more people get fucked over against the agreed on societal backstops in the search for more money except it's still not even fixed.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

That's a gross misrepresentation.

My wife's 6 figure loan was forgiven because she had been paying over 20 years, but had fell victim to those predatory student loan refinancing companies that claimed to have put her into the correct program for 20 year forgiveness, but hadn't. She only found out a few years ago, and the 20 year countdown started then, after 15+ years of payment.

John Oliver did a great episode on it. Worth a look.

The Biden administration honored the spirit of the deal, and forgave her loan in January. If it weren't for that, she'd have another ~15 years of payments.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Also, they're not even doing this yet, they've only just now proposed the rule and still need to put it through like 6 to 12 months of public comments and defending it against any changes. So it's overdue, undersized, and could all fall apart before it goes into practice, but they're going to try to campaign on it anyway because they know in the amount of time it takes for a reporter to explain all of that Trump will have said/done like five more outrageous and stupid things that will drown out any criticism.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


As the November election gets closer, Biden’s team is eager to tout what he’s done to address student loan debt – with the administration recently sending congratulatory emails to 153,000 debt-relief recipients – even if his actions fall short of some Democrats’ expectations.

The amount Biden has canceled is equal to 9% of the $1.6 trillion of federal student loan debt currently held by borrowers.

The Supreme Court ruled that the executive branch does not have the authority to implement Biden’s broad forgiveness program, which would have canceled up to $20,000 for borrowers who make less than $125,000 a year.

The one-time cancellation program would have benefited millions of people, but it drew some criticism because it would not have helped future borrowers or addressed the larger issue of the rising cost of college.

In a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in January, 46% of US adults said Biden has the “best approach” to lowering student debt burdens, compared with 22% who said Donald Trump does.

Still, the Biden administration is working on implementing another path toward a broad student loan forgiveness program, this time relying on a different legal authority in hopes that this attempt holds up in court.


The original article contains 689 words, the summary contains 196 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

In a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in January, 46% of US adults said Biden has the “best approach” to lowering student debt burdens, compared with 22% who said Donald Trump does.

So...22% of respondents think this is a better student loan forgiveness plan:

During his presidency, Trump proposed a 2021 budget that would end subsidized loans, reduce the number of loan repayment plans and end the public service loan forgiveness program.

https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2023/10/30/which-gop-presidential-candidates-have-plans-to-reduce-college-debt/

Ok...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I sure hope they eventually cover nearly everyone.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I wouldn't judge a trauma surgeon for not removing the guard rail from the patient if they managed to stop the bleeding. With two kids about to start college I'd like to see him make some moves to reduce the price we're going to have to figure out how to pay, but this is a solid win.

On this issue Biden's fought hard and I appreciate it.

Shame about the genocide.