368
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
  • Letitia James won a $454 million judgment against Trump, his penalty for a decade of fraud.
  • She and Trump are now fighting over her claims that he withheld evidence from her fraud probe.
  • NY law lets James seek additional fines if evidence that she subpoenaed was lost or destroyed.

New York Attorney General Letitia James is not content to rest on her $454 million civil fraud trial victory, even as Trump's debt to the state keeps snowballing, growing by a punishing $5 million in interest since February.

No, James still has some unfinished Trump business on her calendar.

She is asking hard questions about the $175 million bond that would safeguard at least some of what Trump owes New York while he appeals losing the trial. A hearing on the bond's financial soundness is set for Monday, April 22.

And James is also intent on holding Trump's feet to the fire, along with the feet of his lawyers, over something her office has complained about for four years: the withholding of evidence.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 91 points 2 months ago

Good. Keep at it until you find all the buried bodies.

[-] zigmus64@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago
[-] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

They should start with that golf course...

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

Then we will keep at it until we find them all.

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 63 points 2 months ago

I'm a big fan of Ms. James. She's great.

[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Letitia James for President!

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

None of this means anything till we start seeing actual consequences

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 38 points 2 months ago

hahahah hes got his own butterymales problem hilarious.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Don't misgender him!

It's a "Butt Tizzy Males" problem.

[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I want to see a photo of Letitia James standing in the doorway of Trump Tower spinning the keys around her finger. And smiling that Cheshire cat smile.

[-] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

Great but don’t delay any penalties until it’s too late.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

“Civil fraud victory”?? Did NY state actually get the 454 million?

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

454m was the verdict handed down by the judge. Trump still has the right to appeal, but he either needs to pay the verdict up front right away, or put up a bond to cover it while the appeals process goes forward.

The appeals court lowered the amount of the bond he would need to put up. The current issue is that the document that the bond company sent to the Court is not up to the proper standard, so the court gave Trump more time to remedy that. If he can't, it's possible the bond will get rejected.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

We do we reward incompetence.

Like if the bond isnt up to snuff, why can't Letitia's lawyers write it for them? Oh you fucked it up, here, we don't reward incompetence, well let your persecution do it. Fuck you and your stupid games.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

To be fair, it absolutely works the other way around. In countless towns and cities the upwardly clambering assistant DAs are screwing over people who have no money, piling on twenty, thirty charges for the same act to score points they plan to cash in for a bigger job.

Every day. Right now, in fact. Prison reform is critical, but the Justice system itself could use some patching up from countless decades of conservative fuckery.

[-] HollandJim@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Don’t forget, he’s also on the hook for $110K per day in interest, starting from the judgement day, and I don’t think she’ll let him dodge a nickle of it.

You go, girl!

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

Not yet, but once appeals are through he pays or they start seizing and selling his assets.

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 12 points 2 months ago

Once appeals are through or if the bond is found to be improper - in the latter case, he can still appeal, but she can seize his assets to collect the judgement in the interim.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

Cool but he'd probably pass the consequences off to his staff and lawyers.

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
368 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18073 readers
2963 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS