this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
191 points (96.1% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2692 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Europe's phoney war with China is at an end. After years of building up an improved arsenal for a trade war, Europe is now showing it is willing to get tough on Beijing. 

On Tuesday, EU investigators swooped on the Dutch and Polish offices of Nuctech, a maker of security scanners, in a case that hinges on one of Europe's longest running grievances with China — lavish state subsidies that help Chinese firms undercut European rivals

Nuctech was once run by Hu Haifeng, son of President Xi Jinping's predecessor, Hu Jintao, and China's reaction was predictably seething. The raid "highlights the further deterioration of the EU's business environment and sends an extremely negative signal to all foreign companies," China's mission to the EU fumed

The timing of such an inflammatory raid seems significant, ahead of a trip to Europe by Xi next month — his first in five years, taking him to France, Serbia and Hungary — marking a definitive shift in the way that Europe is prepared to tackle its trade problems with China.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 36 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Who the fuck is it that is making these stupid taglines? Pulls it's gun? Just post a normal title, if you have to spruce this shit up with nonsense, it means your writing sucks or the subject is not worth reporting in the first place

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Well you know how the Europeans are famous for their strong gun culture.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I hear EU discussions are on about the Chinese shops like Temu as well as discussions about Tik Tok

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Temu is a nightmare designed to destroy foreign competition

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (3 children)

This is mind-bending politics to me. My brain can't handle the intricacies. I barely understand what this is about.

[–] nexusband@lemmy.world 43 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Basically, China pumps incredible amounts of money in to companies, so they can undercut prices from EU companies crazy - forcing the EU companies to give up. EU wants to level the playing field.

Edit: With taxes for Chinese companies that want to sell something in the EU, like China already does as well on the Chinese market.

There also another thing at play here: China has laws, so that foreign companies need at least 50% Chinese "shares" (it's not just shares), basically neutering these companies and also giving away the technology to Chinese third parties. Wich further erodes the playing field, because now Chinese companies not only can produce stuff dirt cheap, they can also do it with "high-tech" stuff, without having to pay and/or do the development.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So does the US, though? Tesla has received an absurd amount of government support. So has Intel. This is targeted at China specifically, it's not some economic leveling scheme.

[–] nexusband@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's still a huge difference, because most of the subsidies in "western" countries are Tax Subsidies (there are exceptions). Chinese companies get direct money. There's also the fact, that management is often in the CCP, sometimes even directly involved in the law making and various other things. Almost all subsidies are also in government loans, meaning they have to be payed back - the difference to bank loans though is that the government loans do not have interest. Again something that isn't happening in China...as the CCP mostly owns those companies as well, they do not have to pay back the money.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ml -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Compare the subsidies received by Tesla and BYD. Cite your sources to back up your claims.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yes, because the CCP are renowned for sharing information and transparency.

[–] mamotromico@lemmy.ml -2 points 6 months ago

If the World Bank and the IMF find the data released by China credible, why can’t you?

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ml -3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Fine, then just tell me about what subsidies Tesla has received. I'll wait.

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It is estimated that China's subsidies for its domestic industries are extraordinarily high, ranging from 3-9 times compared to that of other OECD countries. BYD in particular is estimated to have received 2.1 billion EUR in 2022 in direct subsidies alone. This figure is understood to be understated due to additional indirect assistance such as cheaper access to batteries etc.

For comparison, Tesla is estimated to have received around 2.8 billion USD in combined state, local and federal subsidies, with an additional 460 million USD in the form of bailouts and loan assistance, in total to date.

China's Massive Subsidies for Green Technologies | Kiel Institute - https://www.ifw-kiel.de/publications/news/chinas-massive-subsidies-for-green-technologies/

Subsidy Tracker - https://subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/tesla-inc

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Elon Musk’s growing empire is fueled by $4.9 billion in government subsidies

Story from 2015. If you include the tax rebate incentives (which are included in BYD's reporting, but which function differently in China because China lacks direct income tax for most people due to accounting costs... It's an open secret that the Chinese government doesn't care about personal tax income much), Tesla's numbers skyrocket:

Tesla to get US$41 billion in government subsidies over made-in-US EVs and batteries

Tesla has received more than $3.2 billion worth of direct and indirect California subsidies and market mechanisms since 2009, according to an estimate from Newsom's office.

If you want to argue that the $7500 EV purchase incentive is not a direct subsidy because it has no specific cash value (since it's dependent on the person's tax burden)... Be my guest, but that's a laughable position.

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Found the tankie

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Ah okay, wow, nice and concise. Well done, thank you! 🙏

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 0 points 6 months ago

Before the Industrial Revolution, Europe had an issue trading with China as Europe had issues finding anything to trade. Europe's natural resources weren't valuable enough and China was able to produce many manufactured goods.

The colonization of the Americas was done in part to either get new natural resources not located in China or precious metals like silver and gold. The trade deficit got so bad that the UK and other European countries started selling opium as a way to balance trade.

China's reindustrialization is bringing itself back to that old status quo and the EU is trying to fight this.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Fact that it's Hu Jintao's kid makes me think this is theatrics for both sides

Hu Jintao's from a different faction of the CCP than Xi Jinping, this is effectively Europe hitting one of his potential rivals.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


On Tuesday, EU investigators swooped on the Dutch and Polish offices of Nuctech, a maker of security scanners, in a case that hinges on one of Europe's longest running grievances with China — lavish state subsidies that help Chinese firms undercut European rivals.

For years, Brussels has repeatedly taken an emollient tone with Beijing, seeking ultimately futile dialogue on state subsidies and overcapacity in sectors such as steel, aluminum and green tech, rather than choosing direct confrontation and a tit-for-tat trade war.

Europe's early attempts to rival Belt and Road were seen as damp squibs, but an internal Commission document obtained by POLITICO says the bloc must now focus more seriously on building footholds in key strategic mining and energy interests in Africa and Central Asia.

Two people familiar with the impending decision said Brussels was close to designating Shein as a "very large online platform" in the coming days, exposing it to extra scrutiny under the bloc’s content moderation law.

In a classic sign of China's asymmetric approach, shortly after von der Leyen launched her high-profile investigation into made-in-China electric vehicles, Beijing hit Europe’s liquor exports, in a move that seemed particularly tailored to France's cognac sector.

But despite those threats of retaliation, von der Leyen has little room to keep her powder dry, particularly as she fights to win a second term as Commission president — a move that would require support from France, the main advocate of protecting European industry from China.


The original article contains 1,260 words, the summary contains 244 words. Saved 81%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!