Chewy7324

Ausnahme ist der Anbau von mehr als drei Pflanzen, der weiterhin Landwirten vorbehalten bleiben soll.

Werden Sorten aus dem Gemeinsamen Sortenkatalog von Personen angebaut, die nicht ein Unternehmen der Landwirtschaft sind, so stellt dies nicht den Anbau von Nutzhanf [...] dar und fällt damit unter den Begriff des Anbaus von Cannabis im Sinne [...] [des] KCanG.

D.h. beim privaten Anbau zählt CBD-Weed weiterhin zu den max. drei erlaubten Pflanzen, inklusive Schutzmaßnahmen vor Kindern etc.

Außerdem bleiben Nutzhanfextrakte mit mehr als 0,3% THC verboten, d.h. es gibt (zum Glück) kein Schlupfloch für Delta-8-THC o.ä.

Ich glaube, der Besitz von THC-armen Blütrn ist damit erlaubt, und sollte nicht zu den 50g dazuzählen - außer, es wird gerade privat angebaut. Was passiert, wenn die Polizei bei einem in der Tür steht, während man noch getrocknetes, THC-armes, Pflanzenmaterial herumliegen hat, kann ich nicht sagen.

Der YouTube-Verlauf wird automatisch deaktiviert, wenn du beim Cooki-Banner "Alle ablehnen" auswählst.

Ansonsten wird nach dem ersten Ansehen von Videos, die Startseite mit Vorschlägen gefüllt.

Edit: Das ist ein gutes Beispiel für die Nützlichkeit der DSGVO, wenn das Befolgen denn tatsächlich (gerichtlich) eingefordert wird.

Agreed. It seems like Nvidia is under pressure by their commercial customers for better, directly integrated open source drivers.

There is alot of demand for this kind of simplified virtualization infrastructure in the host side.

It'd be great of this meant SR-IOV for all GPUs, but this seems like it only allows for sharing of a GPU to multiple guests. And even then, with most of the driver being on the GPU this might not help regular consumer GPUs at all (features being disabled in firmware). But I really don't know anything about what this actually means.

Stimmt. Dieses "Sicherheitspaket" hat mir mehr die Augen geöffnet, als die vielen anderen (Fehl-)Entscheidungen dieser Regierung. Bei den Meisten konnte ich einen anderen Sündenbock finden.

An meiner Wahlentscheidung wird sich trotzdem nichts ändern, weil ich bezweifle, dass eine andere Partei, im Gesamten, näher an meinen Wüschen wäre.

I disagree with the notion that it's better for the cheaters to have an easier time (and less chance of being detected), but you're right, BattleEye doesn't solve the cheating problem for GTA.

Rockstar should fix their netcode and run game server on dedicated server, instead of their customers PC's. I'd think decting aimbot isn't the biggest issue, while cheaters are able to break entire lobbies...

IMO no game should require client side anti cheat except for shooters, where looking through walls and aimbot is actually difficult to detect server side. At least for those is it possible to find valid arguments (except for being lazy).

I didn't know it was chosen not even 10 years ago, as it felt like it could've been around for longer.

tl;dr
Read the first sentence after each citation ;D

So Wayland, a protocol, is needing the addition of other protocols?

Yes. What we know as Wayland is the Wayland core protocol and a few other protocols that are absolutely necessary for desktop use (stable).

Then there is staging, which is not necessarily implemented by all compositors, e.g. fractional scaling.

Unstable also exists, which is even easier to get a protocol into (idk the exact requirements, likely the amount of support and explicit dislike by contributors).
These are often only used by a subset of compositors with e.g. XDG decoration allowing compositors to announce to clients (windows) that they support server side decorations (top bar with close/minimize/maximize buttons). This isn't implemented by Gnome, but most other desktops support it.

Different desktops also have their own protocols, which are published so that apps targeting those desktops can implement them. Some are also supported by other desktops, if they think they are suitable for them.
E.g. wlr layer shell makes status bars possible, which are used by basic compositors like Sway or Wayfire. KDE also supports it, even though it was originally created by wlroots.

Does this make it a Wayland Distro?

In a way you could say that a compositor is a Wayland distro, as it implements a subset of Wayland protocols.

In the end this is good, because it allows for rapid development and discontinuation of protocols. E.g. if a better protocol comes around, both protocols can be supported at the discretion of every compositor.

The goal was to solve the problem of X11, where Xorg still has to support drawing UI by itself, even though no program or toolkit uses it anymore (the 80s were very different). The Wayland core is so minimal there shouldn't be any issue with using it for a very long time.

Also, Wayland was developed by people with the goal to use it in automotive and other industry applications, where basic desktop functionalities, like multiple windows or session lock, aren't useful.

Cheat makers are likely behind this, asthey have monetary incentives to do so. If its Linux users I'd feel bad because stopping others from playing just because they can't, is extremely bad behaviour.

I like the Moz://a branding, altough most people wouldn't get it, so it makes sense to switch to correct spelling.

Whether the T-Rex is the coreect choice, is another question. I do like that it feels more creative than the basic, reduced logos of today.

Edit: I do like the new Logo. It looks good and it does match its "activist spirit". Mozilla the corporation is different from the foundation, and I do believe, that Mozilla is closer to its roots than all other browser vendors - including the reskins of Chromium.

Blender and DaVinci Resolve work better on Nvidia. AMD might work, but it will be a hassle and you'll likely need the proprietary AMD drivers anyway.

With Nvidia supporting Wayland and the open-source NVK continuing to get better, you could even switch to open source drivers for gaming at some point, if you prefer.

Edit: I've had enough issues with AMD GPU's clocking down while gaming, leading to micro stuttering. So don't buy AMD just because everyone tells you they work flawlessly.

For CPU and mainboard, everything works well — just don't buy a random unknown SSD from Amazon, then you're asking for data loss and random issues.

He said somewhere that he did ask a top contributor if they care, and they didn't. He also said that he rewrote a bunch of code to be able to change the license.

I can't verify this, but it doesn't seem like he infringend on someones copyright. Small changes (e.g. a few lines) don't even (necessarily) qualify for copyright (just like the few sentences I wrote here likely don't).