Signtist

Yes, that's what they want. They think that you can just will your way to mental health and acuity, so thinking "I'm struggling because I'm weak and stupid" will spur you to become strong and smart, while thinking I'm struggling because I have ____ will give you an excuse to keep struggling. They're wrong, but that's what people often think, at least in my experience. They don't see it as a disease you need to treat in order to improve, they see it as a character flaw you need to overcome in order to improve. One guy told me he views "the whole 'neurodivergence' thing" as being like a kid who doesn't want to eat their vegetables saying they've been diagnosed with "can't eat vegetables disease."

I'm not sure, but I'd be surprised if he didn't use his power as president to dodge it somehow. Or he just ignored it - who's going to actually come after him over it anyway?

Yeah, in spite of Trump literally being a felon while also being president, people still can't shake the idea that he's somehow forced to follow the law. He's actively ignoring a bunch of judicial orders, but people keep celebrating whenever another is added to the pile. We're simply unable to understand that when Trump - or any rich person for that matter - gets a sentence that "makes them" do something, they can just... not. And nothing bad will happen to them.

Carry the new guy? If you're lying on your resume to say you have skills that you don't really have, then you're not doing it right. You're supposed to figure out what your skills actually are, then embellish your resume to make those skills shine on paper. I've never had anything but glowing reviews from my employers because I made sure to apply for jobs that suited my skills, and formatted my resume to help me get hired. I'm good at training newbies, but my first employer didn't trust me with that responsibility, so I embellished a bit on my resume to make sure my second employer trusted me enough to let me make use of that skill, and pay me accordingly.

The way I see it is that they're looking to exploit me for as much as they can get, so I have no obligation to treat them with any more respect than that. I don't lie, but I have no problem taking a single instance where I worked next to a couple newbies for an hour and gave them pointers and turning it into "trained and oversaw new hires to ensure proper workflow protocol" on my resume.

They've been raised on the idea that taxes are bad, and never put more thought into it than that. They view things like the fire department as good, so they can't really be funded by those bad taxes, right? ...Right?

But if we point out that it's happening, we'll be called alarmists! No, it's better to just keep saying things are going to happen, so people feel like they still have time to do nothing about it.

My mom would always rag on my sister because she was born vaginally, but had to give birth to her own child by c-section due to breach position. I understand first-hand that mothers are not intrinsically good for their children, but the circumstances of the birth process that are out of their hands isn't really one of the things to judge them on.

Thanks for the tips! I'll have to check that out.

Ah, you're talking about the news story. Sorry, since you replied to my comment, I thought you were talking about the story I shared, which is of a different person. The woman from the news story wasn't diagnosed with a familial cancer condition like a BRCA mutation. Also, it's important to note that while a double mastectomy would definitely be recommended in the case of a BRCA1 mutation, ultimately the patient obviously gets the final decision on what they go with. It's important to offer it, of course, but it's not something to be forced on a person, regardless of the benefits. People have more going on in their life than what a doctor sees in their office, and can sometimes have something of even greater importance going on at the moment. Treatment is always a discussion to have with the patient, not a decision made on their behalf.

I grew up with mac, but I was always so frustrated that I couldn't play the games and run the programs my friends could on their computers. I finally bought my own PC in high school, and was so happy to have the control I always wanted. I haven't switched to Linux yet, but at this point it's inevitable; I'm just dragging my feet on figuring it out.

That's... not true, at least not in 2017 when this happened. Yes, a double mastectomy is an available option, and is the one most commonly taken due to the high risk, but another option, at least in the US at the time, is to have yearly mammograms. Often women want to keep their breasts until they have children and get through breastfeeding, then have a double mastectomy as well as an oophorectomy due to the high ovarian cancer risk that also comes with a BRCA1 mutation. I haven't kept up with recommendations since leaving the field in 2019, but at least back then, there were more than one option, and I'd be surprised if it's been constricted to a forced double mastectomy since then.