[-] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 1 month ago

They're really pushing the narrative that "Russia wants to conquer all of Ukraine" so that when that doesn't happen they can claim victory.

[-] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 month ago

the military triumph of reaching the EU’s borders

Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania are all EU countries that border Russia.

[-] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 1 month ago

"May have".

The US provides Ukraine with targeting info and intelligence. I thought this was public knowledge. Ukraine doesn't have satellites that fly over Russia.

[-] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 month ago

Well duh, Russians are just drones mind-controlled by Putin.

[-] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 month ago

Apparently, in their logic, bankrupting their country, losing a bunch of their young people and crippling the country demographically, economically, developmentally for maybe forever is OK as long as they get to kill a few russians.

[-] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 month ago

The cope on reddit is that Russia is a full on war economy lmao. I know reddit is bad for my health, but I'm addicted to being angry at liberals.

[-] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 2 months ago

He also believes that people serving a sentence should be used in forced labor

This already happens.

[-] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I wish we could turn back time, to the good old days...

"Russia is heading for an outright defeat in Ukraine." -- Francis Fukuyama, March 10, 2022

https://www.americanpurpose.com/blog/fukuyama/preparing-for-defeat/

The war in Ukraine is likely headed for a "devastating Russian defeat," according to an expert on economic policy in the eastern European region.

https://www.newsweek.com/putin-headed-devastating-defeat-ukraine-war-expert-1710410

38

People tell me that because I don't vote I don't have a right to complain. I think the opposite: those who vote play the game (legitimise the system) and shouldn't be salty that their preferred candidate didn't win; they should say ggwp and vote harder next time.

Just throwing that out there so people don't feel pressured into becoming voters. "If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal" said someone once.

If I could vote in a place where invalid votes were counted as invalid and if most votes came in as invalid it would invalidate the election I'd be crossing out the ballot in every election. Unfortunately in most places invalid votes don't count (they're simply a statistic) or they get counted as part of the winning party/candidate's vote (fuck that).

That said, I like how the DPRK chooses candidates. (Ideally) they're chosen through discussion and then a Yes/No vote is done to confirm there is an overwhelming consensus. Hence the Western propaganda against DPRK saying they have one candidate on the ballot and the candidate gets over 90% of the vote.

Remember, choice to keep the Soviet Union won the most votes and they dissolved it anyway.

No one asked me if I want to live in a capitalist system, until they do, I have no reason to go out and vote.

[-] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 3 months ago

Ukraine doesn't have the know-how or logistics to maintain F-16s, hence the long waiting period. Any airfields in Ukraine with F-16s are likely to get struck and destroyed quickly by Russia.

It is a repeat of the Leopard, Challenger, Abrams tanks. The West postponed sending them as long as possible because they knew they'd get destroyed and wouldn't live up to the hype. But boy did the hype feel good.

I'm guessing they're negotiating for Poland to fix/maintain F-16s to then transport them back to Ukraine because no way will they actually take-off and land in Poland. They do the same with Leopard tanks and Caesar SPGs, they get shipped to the EU for repairs. I imagine Poland is being difficult about it because of the protests and the unpopularity of supporting Ukraine military among the Polish population, hence the delay.

All of these deals and arrangements happen behind closed doors.

[-] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 3 months ago

Milei is the new "libertarian" (read: neoliberal) darling.

[-] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 3 months ago

Taurus missiles, of course. G*rman engineering.

79

Before their arrival, the Western warplanes had been held up by some as a potential war-winner that could turn the tide of the conflict in Kyiv’s favour.

“Often, we just don’t get the weapons systems at the time we need them – they come when they’re no longer relevant,” a Ukrainian high-ranking officer told the Politico news website.

“Every weapon has its own right time. F-16s were needed in 2023; they won’t be right for 2024.”

L M A O

27
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by multitotal@lemmygrad.ml to c/worldnews@lemmygrad.ml

Good analysis (as always) from b on Moon of Alabama.

[-] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 3 months ago

NATO article 5 doesn't cover aggression. If France sends troops and they get attacked/killed other NATO countries are under no obligation to step in. This is Macron attempting to look tough since Russia targeted and killed with a missile strike those French mercenaries who were at a hotel/residence in Kharkov (iirc).

This also doesn't give France casus belli to attack Russia since it's France volountarily sending troops to an active war zone.

This will be a huge fiasco and it will weaken France. What it will do is pave the way for Le Pen to become the president of France.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

multitotal

joined 5 months ago