tal

joined 2 years ago
[–] tal 24 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Russia

As of 2024, the total fertility rate across Russia is estimated to be 1.41 children born per woman,[18] which is below the replacement rate of 2.1 and among the lowest in the world.[19] Subsequently, it has one of the oldest populations in the world, with a median age of 41.9 years.

I mean, I agree that they've got to do something, but I don't think that that this is likely going to do it. I don't think that the limiting factor here is sex appeal.

I'm also dubious about the information-control thing they've been doing:

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-battling-birth-rate-dip-is-working-child-free-ideology-ban-says-putin-2024-09-24/

Russia, battling birth rate dip, is working on 'child-free' ideology ban, says Putin ally

Sept 24 (Reuters) - The Russian parliament is working on a law that would ban what the authorities cast as the harmful promotion of a child-free way of life with heavy fines for "childlessness propaganda", a close ally of President Vladimir Putin said on Tuesday.

I think that the larger issue is people not wanting to raise children.

[–] tal 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

More-specifically, a regressive tax, one which hits the poor harder.

[–] tal 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I am pretty sure that that's up to Trump's discretion to grant and am skeptical that Trump would grant it.

https://www.newsweek.com/john-bolton-disappointed-after-trump-removes-his-secret-service-detail-2018535

Bolton, national-security hawk who played a key role in shaping U.S. foreign policy during the first Trump administration, has continued to require Secret Service protection due to threats from Iran, even after leaving the White House in 2019.

After Bolton was fired by Trump, the president terminated his security detail. However, former President Joe Biden reinstated the protection upon taking office in 2021.

The purported plot against Bolton in 2021, one of the most thoroughly documented alleged assassination attempts, is part of what U.S. prosecutors and former government officials describe as ongoing efforts by Iran's Revolutionary Guard. These efforts aim to target Trump-era officials responsible for a 2020 U.S. airstrike that killed Qassem Soleimani, the head of the Iranian Guard's elite Quds Force.

"The Justice Department filed criminal charges in 2022 against an Iranian Revolutionary Guard official for attempting to hire a hitman to target me. That threat still exists, as shown by the recent arrest of someone trying to orchestrate President Trump's assassination. The American people can decide for themselves which president made the right call," Bolton said in his statement to CNN.

On Tuesday, CNN reported that former National Security Adviser John Bolton expressed frustration and disappointment over former President Donald Trump's decision to revoke his Secret Service protection just hours after he returned to the White House.

"I am disappointed but not surprised that President Trump has made this decision," Bolton said in a Tuesday statement to Newsweek. "Despite my criticisms of President Biden's national security policies, he made the decision to extend Secret Service protection to me in 2021."

Bolton has a hostile nation-state actively trying to assassinate him for his work for Trump. Trump pulled his protection because he doesn't like him.

Judge Boasberg has ruled against Trump in one major case and I imagine will most-likely do so in at least a second.

[–] tal 4 points 1 day ago

Finstad said he held a Feb. 26 telephone town hall joined by 3,000 people in his district.

clicks on link

https://www.facebook.com/RepFinstad/posts/pfbid0bBgaYsihdnArsU3kw2fr6mhT1zXCQJjZNnaYMmhAgffAoEVKs8z5khzANPDaWJxcl?rdid=WrvrHq7dpyeCxxAZ

Finstad: Great to talk to and answer questions from the amazing folks in #MN01! Thank you to the 3,000 constituents from across southern Minnesota who tuned in to our Constituent Update Call last night!

Sarah Kujawa: How do we get notified of these? I am your constituent and didn’t get an invite

Anastasia Hopkins Folpe: Sarah Kujawa exactly

Jacque Drew: Sarah Kujawa I just called all 3 offices and asked the same question. No one had an answer but would pass my request along.

MarilynPalmer Frisch: Sarah Kujawa probably another mistruth we have to deal with!

Tori Ann Gross: Sarah Kujawa exactly. I'm on the email list, have called and asked your staffers specifically when you'll be holding a town hall with constituents. How are you notifying people of your events??

Jenni Hollar: Sarah Kujawa it was a lame attempt to appear that he's listening to constituents.

Karen Klefstad Monson: Sarah Kujawa and you note there is no response from him here.

Sharon Vandenorth: Interesting. I spoke about this very lack of communication w your Rochester office yesterday morning and he never mentioned an "update call". Invitation only? That's one way to control the content isn't it. Shameful lack of honesty.

Shannon Helget: I called your office and voiced my concerns yesterday. I wasn't informed of any phone call or town hall meeting where I could hear directly from Congressman Brad Finstad. How do you plan to notify all constituents in your district of these opportunities? You represent ALL of us.

Hmm.

[–] tal 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It was the only search result relevant to my query.

Paste it into archive.org's Wayback Machine. Good odds that they've stored a copy. I'd do it for you and just link to the page, but you don't list the URL...

https://web.archive.org/

[–] tal 3 points 2 days ago

The 15 inch version comes with a 100 Wh battery, which is a rare find.

[–] tal 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

It looks like Trump already did that.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/22/politics/who-is-judge-james-boasberg/index.html

In a series of social media posts, Trump smeared Boasberg as a “Radical Left Lunatic Judge” and called for his impeachment

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Boasberg

James Emanuel "Jeb" Boasberg (born 1963)[2] is an American lawyer and jurist who is the chief judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Appointed by President George W. Bush, he served as a judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia from 2002 to 2011, before Barack Obama nominated him to the US district court for the District of Columbia. Chief Justice John G. Roberts appointed him to the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in 2014, and he served as the presiding judge of the FISC from 2020 to 2021. In 2020, he was appointed to the United States Alien Terrorist Removal Court and designated chief judge.

If he's "radical left", no doubt this is all part of some sort of grand conspiracy between President Bush, President Obama, and conservative Chief Justice John G. Roberts to infiltrate communists into high positions in the government.

[–] tal 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They admitted to using a fucking app over established communications to avoid being on the record

January 20, 2025, Inauguration Day. Trump releases a statement on his top priorities for his presidency:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/01/president-trumps-america-first-priorities/

President Trump’s America First Priorities

DRAIN THE SWAMP

President Trump is taking swift action to end the weaponization of government against political rivals and ordering all document retention as required by law.

March 11, 2025. Jeffrey Goldberg receives chat group invitation for Cabinet-level officials for planning attack on Yemen.

I see that top Trump priorities on swamp-draining lasted


assuming, perhaps generously, that this was the first such incident with Signal


almost seven weeks.

Well, okay. I don't know about the weaponization of government against political rivals. I seem to recall what looked like rather a lot of that, actually. But at least the document retention.

[–] tal 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There's an already-extant ground-based vessel navigation system, Loran-C, though I'm sure that it's possible to improve on it and I have no idea how much of the receiver hardware is still out there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loran-C

The introduction of civilian satellite navigation in the 1990s led to a rapid drop-off in Loran-C use. Discussions about the future of Loran-C began in the 1990s; several turn-off dates were announced and then cancelled. In 2010, the US and Canadian systems were shut down, along with Loran-C/CHAYKA stations that were shared with Russia.[2][3] Several other chains remained active; some were upgraded for continued use. At the end of 2015, navigation chains in most of Europe were turned off.[4] In December 2015 in the United States, there was also renewed discussion of funding an eLoran system,[5] and NIST offered to fund development of a microchip-sized eLoran receiver for distribution of timing signals.[6]

The National Timing Resilience and Security Act of 2017, proposed resurrecting Loran as a backup for the United States in case of a GPS outage caused by space weather or attack.[7][8]

[–] tal 4 points 2 days ago

Upon actually investigating the article, it appears to mention it as well. :-)

[–] tal 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm sure not, but even without looking at any technical details, it will have at least a couple benefits:

  • First, it's short range. GPS satellites are in geosynchronous orbit, which is a pretty high orbit. Wikipedia says about 22,000 miles away. For GPS, the jammer is going to be far closer than the legitimate signal.

  • Second, I'm guessing


though we'll see


that this is going to be a civilian system, and I suppose that they could even try to mandate that militaries not use it. GPS was, from the beginning, a military system, and there are weapons being used in Ukraine that use it for guidance. Unless you're solely out to be a dick


which isn't impossible


probably not a lot of benefit to stomping on civilian-only frequencies.

[–] tal 19 points 2 days ago (7 children)

which is vulnerable to jamming

This has, in fact, been a serious problem in the Baltic region, as Russia's military has been jamming GPS there for some time, and it dicks up navigation for ships and aircraft there.

 

Looks like the Stylish trait


a long-standing ability that allowed one to get a small, constant amount of morale by wearing fancy or very fancy clothing


is gone.

Just noticed this after doing a build out of git.

I kind of regret this. I'm not saying that it's the most-realistic trait, but it made it interesting to collect fancy items.

Related PR on GitHub:

https://github.com/CleverRaven/Cataclysm-DDA/pull/79745

 

For those not familiar, there are numerous messages containing images being repeatedly spammed to many Threadiverse users talking about a Polish girl named "Nicole". This has been ongoing for some time now.

Lemmy permits external inline image references to be embedded in messages. This means that if a unique image URL or set of image URLs are sent to each user, it's possible to log the IP addresses that fetch these images; by analyzing the log, one can determine the IP address that a user has.

In some earlier discussion, someone had claimed that local lemmy instances cache these on their local pict-rs instance and rewrite messages to reference the local image.

It does appear that there is a closed issue on the lemmy issue tracker referencing such a deanonymization attack:

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/1036

I had not looked into these earlier, but it looks like such rewriting and caching intending to avoid this attack is not occurring, at least on my home instance. I hadn't looked until the most-recent message, but the image embedded here is indeed remote:

https://lemmy.doesnotexist.club/pictrs/image/323899d9-79dd-4670-8cf9-f6d008c37e79.png

I haven't stored and looked through a list of these, but as I recall, the user sending them is bouncing around different instances. They certainly are not using the same hostname for their lemmy instance as the pict-rs instance; this message was sent from nicole92 on lemmy.latinlok.com, though the image is hosted on lemmy.doesnotexist.club. I don't know whether they are moving around where the pict-rs instance is located from message to message. If not, it might be possible to block the pict-rs instance in your browser. That will only be a temporary fix, since I see no reason that they couldn't also be moving the hostname on the pict-rs instance.

Another mitigation would be to route one's client software or browser through a VPN.

I don't know if there are admins working on addressing the issue; I'd assume so, but I wanted to at least mention that there might be privacy implications to other users.

In any event, regardless of whether the "Nicole" spammer is aiming to deanonymize users, as things stand, it does appear that someone could do so.

My own take is that the best fix here on the lemmy-and-other-Threadiverse-software-side would be to disable inline images in messages. Someone who wants to reference an image can always link to an external image in a messages, and permit a user to click through. But if remote inline image references can be used, there's no great way to prevent a user's IP address from being exposed.

If anyone has other suggestions to mitigate this (maybe a Greasemonkey snippet to require a click to load inline images as a patch for the lemmy Web UI?), I'm all ears.

 

CHANG: Now, the budget bill does not specifically mention Medicaid, but that's because the budget just gives instructions to lawmakers on the committee that oversees Medicaid to find $880 billion in cuts over the next decade. The legislation doesn't explain exactly where lawmakers should make those cuts, so I started by asking Park very simply, can Congress find $880 billion in federal savings without cutting spending for Medicaid?

PARK: It cannot, unless you're cutting Medicare, and both Speaker Johnson, other House Republican leaders and President Trump have said that they do not want to cut Medicare. So if you take Medicare off the table, Medicaid constitutes 93% of all mandatory spending that remains under the jurisdiction of the Energy and Commerce Committee.


CHANG: Speaker Johnson has talked about how there is about $50 billion worth of fraud in Medicaid each year. Is that an accurate estimate? I'm just curious.

PARK: It is not. What he's trying to do is equate a measure that's used in the federal government to assess improper payments. But he's trying to equate these improper payments as fraud, and the vast majority of improper payments are not because the payments shouldn't have been made, but there were some errors in terms of the documentation related to that payment or errors in terms of some of the procedural steps that were taken in making those payments. But there's no finding that that was actually fraud or even payments that should not have been made.


PARK:...So states are essentially left holding the bag. They're going to have to make the painful choices in terms of cutting eligibility, cutting benefits, cutting payments to providers like hospitals and nursing homes that serve Medicaid beneficiaries. And in fact, that's one of the reasons it's politically attractive to some federal policymakers, is because they're not explicitly cutting Medicaid benefits. They're making states, legislatures, governors have to make the politically difficult choices, the politically painful choices that they'll have no choice but to make in light of these massive cost shifts that they could face.

 

I've typed up a summary/semi-transcript below while I listened through for people who don't like listening to podcasts.

 

The dead cat strategy, also known as deadcatting, is the political strategy of deliberately making a shocking announcement to divert media attention away from problems or failures in other areas.[1][2] The present name for the strategy has been associated with British former prime minister Boris Johnson's political strategist Lynton Crosby.

 

Europe's four biggest porn platforms, Pornhub, XNXX, StripChat, and XVideos, all recorded major drops in traffic in the latest transparency reports that EU law requires them which, if true, would exempt them from some of the most arduous requirements of the Digital Services Act (DSA).

view more: next ›