this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
342 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2639 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teft@lemmy.world 98 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I bet he's going to be a coward and either cancel or not show.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 52 points 2 months ago (3 children)

My understanding is that debates are exempt from the equal air time laws, so if Trump no-shows, it just turns into a bunch of 90 minutes of free Harris air time.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I really want it to continue in debate format, but just pan to an empty podium and 2 minutes of dead air after every Trump question

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How about panning to an empty chair with a giant Project 2025 book propped up in it?

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Oh God, no you let somebody open the 2025 book and read from it. And you allow the other person to ask any question they want.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or Alex Baldwin doing his Trump impression, but saying stuff Trump has actually said.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Put a large picture of Trump's mug shot on the podium and have Mark Hamill off camera read relevant quotes from Trump speeches and rallies in the Joker's voice.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

even that would be better than the shit that falls out of his face sphincter

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For various definitions of "better"

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

any time, any scenario where I hear a dead mic instead of trump's bloviating fuckface spewing lie after obvious lie, is better.

there's a galaxy of definitions, and they're all better.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Maybe it's just naivety, but I still hope for a world where people hear him speak, he gets appropriately ridiculed for the bullshit he says, and people stop trying to follow him. If there's any shred of a chance that that's still possible, I think it'd be better that he shows.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

An event that would only be watched by voters who already support Harris.

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago

It also would create soundbites and video clips that would hit every major platform, though. Every one of which will note that Trump was too cowardly to debate, and possibly include chicken clucking sounds 🐔

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Just have Harris debate a bag of Cheetos on a chair

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

either showing up or not showing up, will hurt more than help his campaign

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago

He apparently did

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago