this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
833 points (95.8% liked)

Political Memes

5507 readers
2586 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] abracaDavid 34 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It's a low bar. If we're now judging candidates in comparison to Trump then we're in trouble.

Trump isn't the standard. He's an anomaly, and we should aim way higher.

[–] InternetUser2012 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Lol, name the last Republican President that wasn't a moron.

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

https://ictnews.org/archive/theodore-roosevelt-the-only-good-indians-are-the-dead-indians

Morality wise, the last good Republican was Grant.

For intelligence it's Nixon imo. Tricky Dick didn't get where he was by being a moron, evil isn't stupid.

Eisenhower very definitely wasn't stupid either.

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bush Sr. Then Nixon before that.

[–] InternetUser2012 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Nixon was an idiot, so was Sr.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

Nixon wasn't an idiot, he was corrupt.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Nixon was most definitely not an idiot. A piece of shit, absolutely, but an intelligent one. America is extremely lucky that Trump isn't Nixon

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

I don't agree. A scale has to be useful for separating what you're measuring. Any scale that puts Kamala as "low" is like trying to measure the size of a banana and an orange in kilometers, they'll both measure "low". There is no decent measure by which Trump is anything but scum. Kamala (or just about anyone who isn't a Trump voter) ranks so far above Trump that they can't be anything under "excellent" on a scale designed to meaningfully compare these candidates.

Obviously the scale we should be using for our politicians SHOULD be better, and that's because we should have produced better candidates. With the candidates we have, we don't get to use a better scale because in doing so we'll be playing right into Republican narrative of "they're both the same" or Kamala is "low" quality so vote for Trump.

[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well, Trump did make a ton of people madly follow him.
It may be leading the world to ruin, but it is still leading.

I'd put the impact rating as "high".
The direction being undesirable.