I've read Parenti but the two are more complementing each other rather than disproving so i never understood the whole Parenti-Chomsky "feud" apart from being sectarian shitstirring.

[–] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's less a feud and more a graduation away from Chomsky's faults and limitations toward Parenti who is unabashed in his defense of peoples' defense and liberation with an explicit practice of historical materialism

[–] DivineChaos100@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Nah, it's definitely a sectarian feud. You calling those "faults and limitations" tells me that you're on one side of that feud.

[–] macabrett@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's not a feud, it's just two writers/lecturers and one is a socialist while the other is not.

[–] DivineChaos100@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Another one on one side of the feud.

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago

What about power dynamics?

[–] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago

Noam is wrong about a lot of things, important things, if that sets me on a "sect" apart from him, so be it

sans-shrug

[–] FearsomeJoeandmac@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You arent a true parenti fan

[–] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 19 points 3 months ago

Oh, you're a Parenti fan? Name three bad VHS rips of his lectures. party-parenti

[–] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 13 points 3 months ago

I am too

powercry-1