this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024

97 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13538 readers

827 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

itsPina@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

sweet_pecan@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

97

why did the sino-soviet split have to happen? (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 1 month ago by borschtisgarbo@lemmygrad.ml to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What?

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Khrushchev (Cornman) was a cringe revisionist, but he did some good stuff. China was right on being critical of Cornman, but their actions after that were cringe.

[–] ComradeMonotreme@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah pretty much Krushchev and the USSR were usually on the correct side (Cuba, Vietnam etc).

The PRC were often correct in their criticism of the USSR's revisionism but lead to bad stuff like supporting Pol Pot and the Muhjahaden.