this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
457 points (93.0% liked)

Memes

45732 readers
572 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 57 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (49 children)

The use of the word "tankie" these days is so over-used it has become synonymous with "left of the DNC." I've even seen Anarchists described as "tankies," it's getting ridiculous. Still, the word "tankie" is most often used by liberals against Marxists, though they won't admit to having an anti-Marxist bias, mostly because they think they agree with Marx generally but are unfamiliar with Marxist analysis.

Really, more people need to read theory before having an opinion on it to avoid speaking past each other. I wrote an introductory reading list for Marxism-Leninism if anyone wants to get a better understanding of Marxism.

[–] FrostyTrichs@walledgarden.xyz 18 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Back when I used reddit it seemed like everyone threw around Fascist in a similar way. Lemmy seems to prefer Tankie. For a lot of people the thinking doesn't go any farther than "I disagree with you, therefore you are ________ist" or whatever.

It is what it is.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It varies from instance to instance. The main users of the word "tankie" are blahaj.zone, lemmy.world, and sh.itjust.works from what I've seen, most other instances generally aren't as bad about it IMO.

[–] NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think I posted something critical of conscripting people to make them fight over who they pay taxes to at the end and got called a tankie and Russian bot.

It is entirely consistent with anarchism to be critical of states using coercive violence to force people to fight for their preservation.

Some of the libs on this protocol are intensely derranged, I think for many it's their first time seeing that people out there disagree with some of their sacred assumptions and it breaks their brains.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 12 points 5 days ago

The devs are tankies and there are some notorious tankie instances, like Hexbear and Lemmygrad, so they're a lot more visible here than on reddit.

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 10 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Probably because there are a lot of tankies here. 🙃

but I- oh wait I do have an opinion on Soviet use of tanks to crush the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 and the 1968 Prague Spring uprising. My bad, continue.

[–] somename@hexbear.net 18 points 5 days ago

I do love tanks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's both overused in the way you describe and yet obscure enough that only terminally-online political people have even heard of it.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yep, it's a deeply unserious term. It's only used unironically, in my experience, by people who haven't read theory yet devote a huge chunk of time to debating online, which is largely a waste of time to begin with. That's why I focus on just trying to correct misconceptions and provide my reading list when appropriate, debating is just an outlet for frustration for most people. It's truly rare that debate convinces anyone.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

thank you for that and the "what is socialism" post; but i'm encountering that theory is somehow still a HEAVY read for someone like who me has been inside the leftist sphere of influence for his entire life; there's needs to be some sort of sound-bite-able way of sharing these messages and i wish that ml's had the capitalists' deep pockets that guarantees a deep bench of talent that could figure something like this out.

it reminds of my own own experience of going from technical support to software engineering by simply reading. your ignorance makes it daunting as first and you have to put in A LOT of effort to understand it when you don't even know the basics and you'll get there eventually if you stick with it; but most won't stick with it and if you're REALLY knowledgeable at it, it becomes difficult to understand why it's difficult for other people.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We need to make more parentiwave tbh, we've been slacking on that

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

i've never heard of parentiwave, but it sounds perfect if it's anything like vaporwave

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Vaporwave but with Parenti speeches 😎

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago (13 children)

It's certainly difficult, but when in doubt I love sharing this person's articles as more bite-sized bits of theory and soundbites from Michael Parenti speeches, haha.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] KrasMazov@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You could start with communist content on YouTube. That tends to be more easily digestible and eases you into reading theory later on.

I can recommend channels like Second Thought, Yugopnik, Hakim, revolutionaryth0t and Ian Neves/História Pública (you'll need to use subtitles for this one if you don't speak portuguese).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (46 replies)