this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
110 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

233 readers
292 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I want a robot but I dont think I would fuck it

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Genuine curiosity and something I've asked many people who have said they want a robot. What for?

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe I could give it sentience

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why would you want that and how would you expect that to happen? How would you know you've accomplished this?

[–] xj9@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For me, it would be like having a kid. I'd raise them and we'd hang out until they develop an affinity for independence and hopefully they wouldn't hate me.

Tech wise they'd need a building sized supercomputer to update their neural net in real time as their context fills up with independent power so basically a proto starship. Nobody really knows how to create embodied sentience, but a sex bot and a dedicated TPU cluster would probably be a good starting point.

Maybe when they're grown we can make ghost guns together and discuss political philosophy idk

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You can just have a kid now. What difference does it make if it's a robot?

[–] xj9@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago

well yeah, but I could try to sentient a robot and have kids. owl-wink

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Consumes fewer resources

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To usher in the end of mankind of course

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

I'd crowdfund a James bond villain style plan.

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because robots are fucking awesome

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I feel like for that something more like a roomba that is specialized for a task and more importantly not shaped like a human is the best option there. I feel like having your labor robots be human fascimilies is kinda weird. Like Rosie the Robot from the Jetsons is basically a slave. She can make quips! I'd feel weird having a humanoid robot like that taking orders from me.

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, I assumed roombas were robots. I didn't mean humanoid robot exclusively. Honestly, I'd rather have a grey goo nanobot fleet that could shape change.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

Fair enough. I'm a sci fi brained nerd and humanoid robots in Sci fi always bugs me unless it's something like Data where the purple was to see if you could make a human robot. Otherwise just have a child.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are tasks only humanoids can do, like get boxes off of high shelves, open them and move things around. Idk there’s a million varied aspects of domestic labor and only something tall with at least two limbs with good manipulation and dexterity could achieve

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

That's because we designed houses for human use. Redesigning kitchens with built in robot parts that has a differen design than a standard kitchen meant for human use is way more likely and practical than bipedal robots designed like humans.

[–] blame@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

once roombas figure out how to properly get the crumbs under the kitchen counter it's over for us all.