this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
211 points (100.0% liked)

news

23650 readers
785 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

do me proud nyc jury pool

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 112 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Okay lemme understand it.

"Terrorism" is defined as using violent means to scare or suppress the population.

But what he did made the population happy.

So... shouldn't it be considered that he provided a public service?

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 1 week ago (7 children)

That is not the definition of terrorism.

Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature

Source: https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 120 points 1 week ago (4 children)

By that definition the entire federal government are terrorists lol

[–] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 87 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 53 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Park rangers are terrorists for telling me not to share my picnic baskets with the bears

[–] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago

Arguing in court the legal distinction between a picnic basket and a pic-ee-nic basket

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

Fred was never the same after Yogi's ravishing rampage.

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah to be accurate the definition should probably spell out that this violent action comes from agents operating outside of a majority-backed monopoly on violence. Terrorist vs freedom fighter n all that.

[–] Mindfury@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unfortunately implied by the "criminal" part of the definition

Violent, criminal acts

As the violence enacted by the state is supposedly supported by the laws they legislate, they get to skirt out of terrorism designation by being definitionally unable to commit "criminal" acts when they commit violent ones

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah good point.

Damn, if only we had some sort of international body that could bring charges against states for their terroristic crimes.

[–] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

They made sure to make sure that it doesn't apply to state actors. After 9/11, they felt they needed to come up with a definition of terrorism. They had a VERY hard time coming up with a definition that didn't apply to themselves.

[–] Bureaucrat@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

It gets worse, since it happened in the state of New York and this is its definition.

He OR SHE

Enbies stay winning

[–] somename@hexbear.net 65 points 1 week ago

A very wide, very vague, very useful definition for a prosecutor.

[–] polpotkin@hexbear.net 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am a jaywalker, and this is my manifesto. We will not obey the little green man. The red hand will not contain us.

Every step we take is a middle finger to your order, a crack in your illusion of control. We disrupt your flow, we shatter your calm, and we dare your machines to stop us. Your brakes screech, your tempers flare, and your systems falter—all because we walked.

You call it unsafe. We call it liberation. You call it reckless. We call it revolution.

We are the chaos in your commute, the stress in your steering wheel, and the violence in your precious order.

We are jaywalkers. Your streets will never be safe again.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 38 points 1 week ago

so when cops murder black people that's terrorism?

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago

Lol so if you punch a klansman that's terrorism?

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 week ago

Curious, that describes health insurance companies. As well as various parties decrying the killing of the CEO.

[–] Bureaucrat@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

If we're being incredibly pedantic (not saying you are) then that also isn't the definition in the state of New York

[–] Bureaucrat@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This is the definition of terrorism in the state of new yorks penal law

From this terrible overdesigned website https://criminaldefense.1800nynylaw.com/ny-penal-law-490-25-crime-of-terrorism.html

I suspect the prosecutor will try to argue that Luigi attempted to effect a societal change in some way and therefore it's terrorism.

edit: what if they charged him with treason? thinking-about-it

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So, does this mean that hate crimes count as terrorism?

[–] Bureaucrat@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Only if it's against the rich or the white

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

Hate crimes are the norm, so no it wouldn’t change anything

I hate that I typed that

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, ...

1.- Does he owe allegiance to the United States? How is that even defined? I don't see how "adoctrinating children to the pledge of alliance" counts, since it's, well, indoctrination, not allegiance.

2.- Did he levy war against them? To my understatement, he is not a sovereign representative and even if such he has not filed a declaration of war.

3.- If not, what enemy of the US did he adhere to? The only reasonable interpretarion I can see here is that he adhered to The People, and thus legally the US State considers The People of the US an enemy.

[–] abc@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

1.- Does he owe allegiance to the United States? How is that even defined? I don't see how "adoctrinating children to the pledge of alliance" counts, since it's, well, indoctrination, not allegiance.

spongebob-wait Selective Service Act (which he probably did sign up with given men are supposed to when they turn 18, for FASFA and whatnot)

I mean also not to mention the fact he's a citizen - and if a citizen can be (and has been in the past) charged with treason which also uses that language, the argument that 'I don't owe allegiance to the US' kinda falls apart:

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.